.

Could it not be considered nudity? You have to bare in mind the majority of people seeing your avatar are 13 year olds and so I personally don't feel it is appropriate to have.

However, I'm not sure what the mods/admins view on this is.

If you have to question it, you probably shouldn't use it.

yeah, i personally have no problem with it, but theres a lot of youngsters on here

I personally wouldn't post any sexually suggestive shots of myself on a forum which anyone can read, but it's up to you...

If you're under 18 it's illegal anyway, so mods will remove it as soon as they can if they're unsure on age. It falls under pornography of a minor (despite the fact you put it up).

But really, on a BB forum I don't see why you feel the need for a semi naked sexually suggestive avatar? Your body is your temple and you're allowing any paedophile or pervert who wants to - stumble across your picture, and well...Not nice.

maybe cover up a little

but saying that i did see someone post a naked pic of rebecca's boobs up on the forum today and that wasent censord

Yeah, that shouldn't have been allowed either - but some things do slip through the net as mods can't be on 24/7. Members are meant to 'report posts' if they see anything dodgy to bring it to mods attention.

myself i thinks its a nice pic, you have a good body but... We have to have rules coz many people will be sending in sexual pics and there some under 18s that use this site. Best to ask admin than them taking you off the site, maybe do another pic. X

Keeping the pic on the site is illegal anyway, cos you could very easily be under 18 and then it's (in theory) child pornography.

good point there.

Yeah, it's not really appropriate for this site... for the reasons that have been mentioned in the replies. Though you did say in a previous post you were 18.

(Mods and admin can use the search function btw, in case people are wondering how I searched, it will return soon).

Um.... am I the only one who is uncomfortable with her sig? Not only because of the content but also because is so large.

I just figured she was advertising her services for a fee.

I think both are within the rules of the site. If you're really uncomfortable though - let a mod know.

I remember another signature aaages ago that was removed despite it not breaking rules, just cos it was inciting arguments and people were uncomfortable with it. (It was an anti-war sig btw, not a half naked woman Slightly different, but still).

Haven't received any official complaints about the signature yet, however I have now resized it to comply with Forum Guidelines, i.e. no wider than 550 pixels.

Well I do not want to make a fuss I was just wondering. But when it loads up and in my sitting room or at college im going to look like a right prev. I know her profile says she is 18 but she does look younger.

I thought she was about 15 to be honest. I'd turn sigs off if I were you.

Well if no one else is going to say it.

Tis a bit skank - dont you think?

Yup I thought that age but she has 1989 in her profile. Not that it is hard to change it.

Lmao! I did say it. In a u2u to bright eyes.

I've already made comment to James on her age when her avatar was what this thread is about. Apparently she's previously mentioned she is 18 and James is agreeing with that.

I still think she looks ~15 though, and I think the half naked pictures are hardly necessary on a site children use - but still, she's following rules I suppose so it's not her fault.

Are you on about the one thats currently up? I dont see anything wrong.

I think she looks 18.
And skanky? Respecting other members I dont thinkso