Harrys baby ?
Does anyone like myself think Harrys baby has already been born ?
|
wouldn't surprise me if they keep it in secret first few days
|
Quote:
No ITV have it on twitter Of course they are waiting for a Instagram alert - thats how the press find out with this Mother who is being tricxky |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes he may not go abroad until the baby is born |
Quote:
That would be shocking |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I doubt it, but I hope so, they deserve to have their first kid in peace without all the BS fanfare imo
|
Quote:
That would be terrible for the Press to kept out. |
Quote:
But that can be cancelled they would pre warn them etc. |
I think it's possible. Harry wouldn't go abroad if the baby's birth was imminent :think:
|
I doubt very much that the Queen is happy with the controlling Meghan
|
I don't know why it's our business when she did or didn't have the baby it really doesnt matter
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i don't believe it could be kept silent, someone would have leaked the news. Holland is literally a couple of hours away, it's not Australia
|
Quote:
Are you really saying that when you gave birth you'd want crowds of people outside the hospital awaiting your exit, press surrounding you on the way to the car taking photos etc. Really, their baby is nobody's business but Harry and Meghans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If this kid was going to get anywhere near to being on the throne, I’d sort of get wanting a big fuss made, but it’s not, so while it might be a royal baby, it’s not an important one, let them do what they want I think, I quite like that they’re bucking traditions, I’d imagine that when they’re ready they’ll be releasing a bunch of pictures from a photo shoot anyway, so no harm done
|
probably, would not trust her as far as i could throw her and I think William has told this to harry and they ave had frequent rows
|
The trip may have just been announced but it will have been in the diary for a good while.
Harry would hardly walk away from his commitments to Invictus, unless the birth is actually expected on either of the two days he is away. Baby could already be here, if so then congratulations to the happy couple. As to keeping it private and within the family, good on them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Harry is a big boy, why do you think he shouldn't take responsibilities for his own choices? |
Quote:
If she had had the baby, good for her. I doubt it though as it would have came out by now. IF they managed to keep it secret, its obviously for good reason, and its both their choice also so not sure why its only her getting the blame. |
Parents should be allowed to bond with their kid in private before showing them off to anyone else, it’s their baby, not ours, this weird possessiveness we have over the royals is bizarre
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The baby was said to be due in April, well, it's May now. And I'm perfectly happy for them to keep it all to themselves, so long as I'm not expected to listen next time she's wanting attention for some cause. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It may well be tradition for Royals to be photographed within minutes of getting their stitches but..that doesn't mean someone can't buck the trend, or even totally change tradition..I imagine now that one couple have done it, more will in future now they know its an option. I don't really get what difference it makes between them announcing it the hour it happens, or saying a few days later 'we had X at 4.56am on 2 May, happy and healthy' or something. Fairly sure they will have told family, if its happened. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I told you... my friend Alice... she's always right. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.