ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Harrys baby ? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=356318)

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 08:22 AM

Harrys baby ?
 
Does anyone like myself think Harrys baby has already been born ?

Nicky91 02-05-2019 08:29 AM

wouldn't surprise me if they keep it in secret first few days

arista 02-05-2019 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536136)
Does anyone like myself think Harrys baby has already been born ?


No


ITV have it on twitter


Of course they are waiting for a Instagram
alert - thats how the press find out
with this Mother who is being tricxky

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10536145)
No


ITV have it on twitter


Of course they are waiting for a Instagram
alert - thats how the press find out
with this Mother who is being tricxky

I doubt very much Harry would be going abroad for 3 days next week if the birth was imminent ,I think the control freak meghan has got her way and is keeping it secret from the public ,Poor Harry what a mess he's landed himself with

arista 02-05-2019 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536147)
I doubt very much Harry would be going abroad for 3 days next week if the birth was imminent ,I think the control freak meghan has got her way and is keeping it secret from the public ,Poor Harry what a mess he's landed himself with


Yes he may not go abroad until the baby is born

arista 02-05-2019 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 10536143)
wouldn't surprise me if they keep it in secret first few days



That would be shocking

Kazanne 02-05-2019 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536136)
Does anyone like myself think Harrys baby has already been born ?

Yes,I do Chuff,that thought crossed my mind too.he is off to the Netherlands next week so it leaves little time,but they are keeping it quiet

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10536150)
That would be shocking

My guess was the baby is already over a week old

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10536151)
Yes,I do Chuff,he is off to the Netherlands next week so it leaves little time,but they are keeping it quiet

Yes and there is not a chance he would be going if baby due as it is

Liam- 02-05-2019 08:38 AM

I doubt it, but I hope so, they deserve to have their first kid in peace without all the BS fanfare imo

arista 02-05-2019 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536152)
My guess was the baby is already over a week old


That would be terrible for the Press
to kept out.

arista 02-05-2019 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10536151)
Yes,I do Chuff,that thought crossed my mind too.he is off to the Netherlands next week so it leaves little time,but they are keeping it quiet


But that can be cancelled
they would pre warn them etc.

Vanessa 02-05-2019 08:46 AM

I think it's possible. Harry wouldn't go abroad if the baby's birth was imminent :think:

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 08:48 AM

I doubt very much that the Queen is happy with the controlling Meghan

Morgan. 02-05-2019 08:57 AM

I don't know why it's our business when she did or didn't have the baby it really doesnt matter

Niamh. 02-05-2019 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536147)
I doubt very much Harry would be going abroad for 3 days next week if the birth was imminent ,I think the control freak meghan has got her way and is keeping it secret from the public ,Poor Harry what a mess he's landed himself with

That poor woman, god knows what she's actually done to deserve such hate. What's wrong with wanting a bit of privacy after giving birth? Bloody hell :laugh:

Kazanne 02-05-2019 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blurryface (Post 10536171)
I don't know why it's our business when she did or didn't have the baby it really doesnt matter

It's a forum where we discuss lots of things that are none of our business , that's kind of the purpose of the board.

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536173)
That poor woman, god knows what she's actually done to deserve such hate. What's wrong with wanting a bit of privacy after giving birth? Bloody hell :laugh:

The baby is a Royal baby, no one wants the cameras allowed in their house, but to be like Wills and Kate and just share the news that the baby has been born

Niamh. 02-05-2019 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536179)
The baby is a Royal baby, no one wants the cameras allowed in their house, but to be like Wills and Kate and just share the news that the baby has been born

and I'm sure they will, why begrudge them a week of peace though?

bitontheslide 02-05-2019 09:02 AM

i don't believe it could be kept silent, someone would have leaked the news. Holland is literally a couple of hours away, it's not Australia

Morgan. 02-05-2019 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 10536176)
It's a forum where we discuss lots of things that are none of our business , that's kind of the purpose of the board.

I'm not just on about the forum, this is a nationwide thing, so you don't need to get clever with it. She gets hate for wanting to keep her baby secret, but that's just what most others would want to do.

Are you really saying that when you gave birth you'd want crowds of people outside the hospital awaiting your exit, press surrounding you on the way to the car taking photos etc. Really, their baby is nobody's business but Harry and Meghans.

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536181)
and I'm sure they will, why begrudge them a week of peace though?

They would still get peace, its not like the cameras will be allowed in Frogmore ....... Shes alienating Harry from the public who have always loved him ,God it was the worst days work he did when he put a ring on her finger and poor lad will rue the day very soon, if he's not already

chuff me dizzy 02-05-2019 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blurryface (Post 10536185)
I'm not just on about the forum, this is a nationwide thing, so you don't need to get clever with it. She gets hate for wanting to keep her baby secret, but that's just what most others would want to do.

Are you really saying that when you gave birth you'd want crowds of people outside the hospital awaiting your exit, press surrounding you on the way to the car taking photos etc. Really, their baby is nobody's business but Harry and Meghans.

You forget this baby is a Royal baby

Liam- 02-05-2019 09:06 AM

If this kid was going to get anywhere near to being on the throne, I’d sort of get wanting a big fuss made, but it’s not, so while it might be a royal baby, it’s not an important one, let them do what they want I think, I quite like that they’re bucking traditions, I’d imagine that when they’re ready they’ll be releasing a bunch of pictures from a photo shoot anyway, so no harm done

LeatherTrumpet 02-05-2019 09:10 AM

probably, would not trust her as far as i could throw her and I think William has told this to harry and they ave had frequent rows

smudgie 02-05-2019 09:12 AM

The trip may have just been announced but it will have been in the diary for a good while.
Harry would hardly walk away from his commitments to Invictus, unless the birth is actually expected on either of the two days he is away.
Baby could already be here, if so then congratulations to the happy couple.
As to keeping it private and within the family, good on them.

Niamh. 02-05-2019 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10536198)
probably, would not trust her as far as i could throw her and I think William has told this to harry and they ave had frequent rows

In the same sentence with what we've been reading about that one lately mmhhmm

Niamh. 02-05-2019 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 10536188)
They would still get peace, its not like the cameras will be allowed in Frogmore ....... Shes alienating Harry from the public who have always loved him ,God it was the worst days work he did when he put a ring on her finger and poor lad will rue the day very soon, if he's not already

I'm really not liking this blame the woman for manipulating the man into marrying here, and wanting to keep the birth of their first child private......

Harry is a big boy, why do you think he shouldn't take responsibilities for his own choices?

Vicky. 02-05-2019 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536173)
That poor woman, god knows what she's actually done to deserve such hate. What's wrong with wanting a bit of privacy after giving birth? Bloody hell :laugh:

Yeah, the anger directed at her, over everything (including things like her shutting the car door wrong..I swear I have seen pages of insults on that!) seems so disproportionate to anything I have seen before.

If she had had the baby, good for her. I doubt it though as it would have came out by now. IF they managed to keep it secret, its obviously for good reason, and its both their choice also so not sure why its only her getting the blame.

Liam- 02-05-2019 09:17 AM

Parents should be allowed to bond with their kid in private before showing them off to anyone else, it’s their baby, not ours, this weird possessiveness we have over the royals is bizarre

Niamh. 02-05-2019 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 10536208)
Yeah, the anger directed at her, over everything (including things like her shutting the car door wrong..I swear I have seen pages of insults on that!) seems so disproportionate to anything I have seen before.

If she had had the baby, good for her. I doubt it though as it would have came out by now. IF they managed to keep it secret, its obviously for good reason, and its both their choice also so not sure why its only her getting the blame.

and if she actually hasn't had the baby I wonder if people vilifying her will acknowledge that? :think:

Livia 02-05-2019 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536173)
That poor woman, god knows what she's actually done to deserve such hate. What's wrong with wanting a bit of privacy after giving birth? Bloody hell :laugh:

I guess it's that, you know what you're getting when you marry a royal, and she married him... it was her choice. What makes me frown is the fact that she's trying to change stuff. Thanks God she's just a minor royal. She's living a very privileged life now and that comes at a cost.

The baby was said to be due in April, well, it's May now. And I'm perfectly happy for them to keep it all to themselves, so long as I'm not expected to listen next time she's wanting attention for some cause.

parmnion 02-05-2019 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blurryface (Post 10536185)
I'm not just on about the forum, this is a nationwide thing, so you don't need to get clever with it. She gets hate for wanting to keep her baby secret, but that's just what most others would want to do.

Are you really saying that when you gave birth you'd want crowds of people outside the hospital awaiting your exit, press surrounding you on the way to the car taking photos etc. Really, their baby is nobody's business but Harry and Meghans.

She should announce the birth immediately so the press **** off from outside the hospital so normal folk can get on with thier lives...and no..most mothers and parents can't wait to tell everyone about thier happy news.

Livia 02-05-2019 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10536214)
She should announce the birth immediately so the press **** off from outside the hospital so normal folk can get on with thier lives...and no..most mothers and parents can't wait to tell everyone about thier happy news.

Oh no, she's not going to hospital... at least not the one all the other royals have been to. And she won't be posing outside with the baby either.

Vicky. 02-05-2019 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536211)
and if she actually hasn't had the baby I wonder if people vilifying her will acknowledge that? :think:

Nah, she will have put the rumours of her having had the baby out there herself for attention in that case.

parmnion 02-05-2019 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10536216)
Oh no, she's not going to hospital... at least not the one all the other royals have been to. And she won't be posing outside with the baby either.

Is she even pushing?

Niamh. 02-05-2019 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10536213)
I guess it's that, you know what you're getting when you marry a royal, and she married him... it was her choice. What makes me frown is the fact that she's trying to change stuff. Thanks God she's just a minor royal. She's living a very privileged life now and that comes at a cost.

The baby was said to be due in April, well, it's May now. And I'm perfectly happy for them to keep it all to themselves, so long as I'm not expected to listen next time she's wanting attention for some cause.

But things do change, even the Royals, the whole thing would be extremely stagnant and archaic otherwise. Wasn't it William and Kate having a child that changed the tradition of boys first for the throne rather than first child of either sex for example, or did I imagine that?

Vicky. 02-05-2019 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10536214)
She should announce the birth immediately so the press **** off from outside the hospital so normal folk can get on with thier lives...and no..most mothers and parents can't wait to tell everyone about thier happy news.

Most parents aren't stalked by paparazzi. Of course its part and parcel of marrying Harry, that part I agree with, but that doesn't mean they have to open up every minute of their private lives to the public.

It may well be tradition for Royals to be photographed within minutes of getting their stitches but..that doesn't mean someone can't buck the trend, or even totally change tradition..I imagine now that one couple have done it, more will in future now they know its an option.

I don't really get what difference it makes between them announcing it the hour it happens, or saying a few days later 'we had X at 4.56am on 2 May, happy and healthy' or something. Fairly sure they will have told family, if its happened.

Livia 02-05-2019 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10536224)
Is she even pushing?

She'll probably have someone to do that for her...

Livia 02-05-2019 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 10536225)
But things do change, even the Royals, the whole thing would be extremely stagnant and archaic otherwise. Wasn't it William and Kate having a child that changed the tradition of boys first for the throne rather than first child of either sex for example, or did I imagine that?

Yes... but they shouldn't change because an American actress has decided to shake things up a bit. And what's more, I think people feel very protective of Harry; I'm sure many people feel quite protective of him and he seems besotted. Which is lovely... but....

I told you... my friend Alice... she's always right.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.