I really hope she stays.
I know she may be boring. But I genuinely think she has more to offer, and I think it would be such a punch in the gut if she were to go, and Danny was to stay.
She's such a nice person, too. I have a feeling she may be one of the four to go. But I have no idea why. She hasn't been nasty or done anything to warrant being evicted. I'll be so pissed if Danny, who is vacuous and nasty was one of the two to stay, whilst Chloe was to go. Please, get rid of Danny "I don't fancy Sarah" Wisker. Or as I call him, Danny the Fanny. |
Quote:
|
Meh, I'm not too bothered about her either way really, but I would much prefer Danny to go. He is just as boring, if not more so, and he comes across as really sleazy for some reason to me to D:
|
Danny needs to go.
I want Kieran to stay mainly, but I don't mind Chloe staying as she would be beating nasty bores imo. |
Danny needs to go.
I want Kieran to stay mainly, but I don't mind Chloe staying as she would be beating nasty bores imo. |
Quote:
|
Was sure she was going to stay but the odds don't agree thankfully
Kieran and Sarah to stay would be ideal |
Chloe to stay so she can continue to be dull?
|
You don't need to hope, she will be staying...it's vote to evict, the public don't have the sense to evict people who aren't doing anything over people who are
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No thanks hope she goes she is DULL and probably the dullest in the there .
|
Quote:
A) the pool of nominees is not large enough, it should be the entire house B) it's the wrong voting system and should be vote to save And that's because if those two things were in place, we would be sure to lose four dullards. The problem with the twist is that the public will vote out the four best and most essential housemates out of those that are up, because that's what happens under vote to evict. If the public could be trusted to evict the right housemates and the whole house was up, I wouldn't have an issue with the twist...but they can't. So I do. The reason I'm saying it should be scrapped is because this is a desperate interjection by the head of programming at C5 to chase after ratings and it's one that will be to the detriment of what was quite an enjoyable series. Had it been carried out as I outlined above, maybe it might not have been so bad...but as it is, it's awful and is a repeat of the worst twist in BBUK history. Add to that Aaron's ejection and how it appears they may have dropped the theme and it's quite obvious that this has been one of the messiest, most rushed and shoddiest television production days anywhere ever. I don't see how people can defend that. |
I love how people complain about the nasty housemates being nasty, yet slate the nice ones, like Chloe.
Nasty = Entertaining Nice = Dullard If that's how it works, how come BB15 is held in low regard, considering every single person that year was disgusting. Honestly, what is your ideal housemate then? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think her and Kieran are in similar boats. They have important standings in the house but have so far avoided the main core of conflict so haven't featured in the highlights heavily. That MIGHT be what saves them tomorrow. They're both the most decent people in there. She's not a favourite of mine at all but I wouldn't begrudge her if she stayed.
|
Quote:
Literally, give me one thing. Apart from her usual discussions about fancying Danny, bitching sessions with Harriet, and the odd argument with Cristian. She's done nothing that can be considered funny or even remotely entertaining. She was virtually non-existent when she was up for eviction last week. |
Quote:
The second bit is an over simplification. I actually enjoyed BB15 and have made many a post defending it on here. And 'disgusting' is a bit of an over the top description for contestants on a reality show but I'm used to it. This year the best housemates so far have been Jade, Aaron, Sarah, Harriet and to a lesser extent the twins, Eileen and Nick. All have contributed or created storylines. I actually like most of this cast, I don't even dislike Chloe or Danny...but in comparison to the rest of the nominees, they do bring less to the show, and thus should go. But they won't. |
Quote:
I don't think there should be a prize fund so people go in for the adventure not the money. Sadly the innocence of BB1 is history, and the desperation for fame is top priority |
Quote:
I also admire her for not turning on Jade, I am entertained by her friendship with both Jade and Harriet. I also really like how she doesn't beat around the bush, she says what she thinks and I found her standing up for Kiran who Eileen was trying to drag him interesting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's about it, really. Same thing can be said about Chloe. Her being twatted over the head, during the Pillow fight. :joker: I found her secret mission hilarious. When she hurled a glass of water on Aaron in the dark, and tried to retain her laughter as he screamed like a banshee. The way she confronted Nick, about his nomination of her. But wasn't nasty about it, and knew when to let it go, instead of being one of those bitter idiots who think they are above being nominated. Her in the rapping task with Cristian and Kieran, with her crap singing. Her friendship with Harriet is another one. |
#SaveChloe #EvictDanny
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.