How do you think a USA season would go like if edited like Survivor?
 

So in survivor editors all ready know the winner so edit the show so when the winner is revealed we the viewers should be happy that the person who wins is the winner as we have be shown how they played a good game, while the losing finalists are often under-edited or made to look like a goat no one respects.

While Big Brother does not have this as it is edited weakly and sometimes the front runner going into the finals (Tyler/Paul/Vanessa) or someone people claim played the better game (Dani R/Dan (14)) often lose and people are upset and all rigged.

Take the last season, knowing the outcome, how do you think it would be edited? Would Kaycee get more edit early on showing she had a good social game? Would Tyler get a bad edit so we wouldn't feel too bad when he loses? Would the hive be under-dogs even though they was idiots?

Season 19 is another season that would be hard to edit, how would you edit Josh as a winner?

Kaycee would've gotten more narrating DR's on situations throughout the season :laugh: And tbf she was in on a lot of conversations/plans so they probably would've focused more on her in those. More of like a Derrick edit.

As for Paul's losses, I think it would've still been edited more as a Paul loss than a Nicole/Josh win.

True here, I think it would have focused more on why Paul lost like they did with Russell in 19/20

Season 3 would have been interesting, I think they would have downplayed Dani and emphasised more on Lisa as a social threat

bit in the way like the germans do with Promi Big Brother

sort of survivor like physical immunity challenges, on weekdays live shows


and also the ''rich'' and ''poor'' divide, like one part in a house, and one part more in a shed, outside with construction theme was last year