Women rage at the new nike airmax women's trainer.
|
cast iron winner i would say, no idea why women are so pressed
|
They gonna be ironing each other out over those things?
|
never even thought they looked like an iron until I read the article, my first thought was that they were really ugly though
|
I don't understand why they make different trainers for men and women, they're just feet.
|
Quote:
|
Ahhhh… an iron. I thought maybe the clear bit on the sole looked like a stripper heel. Anyhoo, Jess is right, we don't need special shoes. And neither do we need special pink razors with chunky handles for our big fumble fingers.
Oh, and Niamh's right too... they're ugly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have been informed of the strange razor discrepancies though. I can't think of any valid reason for it :think: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
mens underwear is designed to last for decades where womens underwear is designed to last for days :laugh:
|
Quote:
Bikes. Why do men have to ride one with a bar that makes it harder to get on, while women's bikes let you just step through? I mean, come on... we don't still ride horses side saddle, you know. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Though I suppose the theory might be that leg hair isn't as thick as facial hair and that's why the razors are different? I dunno. It still seems like "the sharper the better" would always be the case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The mans chin is also a lot tougher skin wise than the soft skin on the leg, so a sharper razor is more likely to cut you
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.