Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
in a democracy you are entitled express yourself however you see fit, and that applies particularly in the house of commons. If his speech is inciting hatred, then make him accountable for it. Use the laws that exist. Attempting to censor the use of certain common words is not the way to go about it, and it certainly isn't democracy
|
He will be held accountable that's been decided however should it ever come to that .. That the prime minister has to be investigated for his divisive conduct?
It's almost through the looking Glass bizarre that its in any way acceptable to shout down frightened predominantly female MPs.
His changing the name of the bill was tactical it was also childish. What if that happened regularly and tory bills on universal credit, bedroom tax and disability benefits were referred to as something else...The starve bill? The live in a box bill? The why won't you just die bill?
Whichever way you look at it Johnson is not fit to be prime minister, he's in no way shape or form democratic. He's proved that time and again in his attitude to parliament and now also the supreme Court.