Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeB
She hasn't done anything wrong and people like to criticise her over anything she does. She can't show human emotion, she can't be friends with others, she can't miss her family and all that without being slated. It's really childish and quite nasty to give someone who hasn't done anything wrong this amount of hate. James actually did things wrong and the hate for him wasn't this extreme and Ian gets let off for acting like a child, he was the most miserable person in there and it affected the whole camp. Jacqueline struggled with cyclone which is understandable because it's not the easiest of trials but who cares? they wouldn't say a thing if others struggled. Cherie called her an awful woman yesterday  for staying with Dan.. for all we know he hasn't cheated and she is in a happy relationship. I don't know why people are pretending they know all about their marriage when they really don't. There's no proof he has cheated just rumours and the media make money from it. People will say Jacqueline won because of sympathy but that would come across as bitter. Jacqueline has always been quite popular because of Eastenders, she doesn't need the media to win. She would win from her jungle experience and her marriage isn't part of that journey because she never once spoke about any rumours or anything like that. Jacqueline was really out of her depth but i'm glad she faced her fears and grew confident in herself. What will these people do when iac is over and they can't talk about Jacqueline all the time? |
Exactly.
James and Ian were notorious for creating ACTUAL tension within the camp whereas Jaqueline was harmless and got along with everybody. And if you’re gonna base your decisions on her being lazy and not being a team player, why do you choose to ignore the time she’s actually won meals for camp so your faves James and Ian could eat?