View Single Post
Old 12-02-2014, 02:40 PM #1
michael21 michael21 is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In my big house
Posts: 13,901


michael21 michael21 is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In my big house
Posts: 13,901


Default Channel 5 announces it is developing own Benefits street

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/b...ounces-3136602

Channel 5 announces it is developing own Benefits Street called Living on the Social

Quote:
The channel is currently looking for families and individuals to speak about their lives on welfare, though filming has already begun on the new series

Could White Dee be changing channels?
Channel 5 has confirmed that it is developing a new series based on those living on benefits.

Produced by the channel's in-house production company, the Benefits Street-style series is being developed under the title of Living on the Social and will follow the channel's documentary On Benefits and Proud.

The channel - which aired the Big Benefits Row live debate last week - is currently looking for families and individuals to speak about their lives on welfare, though filming has already begun.

Guy Davies, Channel 5's factual commissioning editor told industry magazine Broadcast: "After the success with On Benefits and Proud last year, we immediately started work on a new broader series with a working title Living on the Social.

"We've started filming people's stories, and working closely with them in various locations all over the UK."

Benefits Street became a surprise ratings hit for Channel 4 when it debuted in January and has been renewed for a second series, although the cameras will not return to the now notorious James Turner Street in Birmingham.

The Channel 4 docu-series will end on Monday with a 30-minute programme called Benefits Street: The Last Word, where cast members will talk about the show and Britain’s welfare system.
this is big brother for jobcentre staff no less

Last edited by michael21; 12-02-2014 at 02:43 PM.
michael21 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote