Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster
Let's get it straight; you didn't have your say on the topic at all - you had another pop at my say, because it is me who is saying it.
It's the author you have the real issue with not what he has written, but as usual with people who are driven to criticise through personal agendas rather than genuine opposition to what is being stated in the post they are purporting to criticise, you have nothing valid to say, because you either don't read what you're criticising, or read it but don't understand.
You purport to respond to my post because you disagree with it, but when I respond to your response for the same reason, you 'cop out' by stating you're 'not interested.
LMFAO.
|
You seem you be taking my stance on this personally... I have no idea why.
I don't have anything against you, I disagree on this is all.
If you don't think I've anything valid to say that's fine, just don't respond to my posts then
