Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth
they are unlicensed, they cannot be inspected by the local government or tested by local government like every other taxi in the uk and their drivers are not licensed with local government either....this means ubers expenses are way lower and they can then afford to have lower prices because their expenses are lower (no costs for private hire licenses, no costs for driver badges, no vosa test costs, no threat of the councils taking your cars off the road if found in poor condition, no taxi signs, no council taxi meters, no legal requirement to calibrate the meters etc) they don't even have to pass the local knowledge test like all other taxi firms. (knowledge tests are as hard as degree course exams, in some cases harder, it takes years to study for) they don't even need to show their fleet insurance to the local council? taxis have to send in their mots, licenses per vehicle, per driver, insurances, log books , they also have to appear before council committees whenever ANY points get added to their drivers licenses. this is also massive cost in terms of money and time.
competition is fine, the app is fine, the fact its NOT a level playing field and they don't have to abide by the same rules and laws as everyone else is an absolute outrage.
|
They are inspected by someone better than the local government. they are inspected by the local POPULACE. because of the strict rating system. Why is there no rating system for the normal taxi drivers?