View Single Post
Old 30-06-2017, 01:06 PM #20
smudgie's Avatar
smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 24,191

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
smudgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 24,191

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxie View Post
It's multiple Judges not a Judge, the case has been to the high court, supreme Court, the European court.

While I understand how desperate his parents must be, it has been said by experts that this baby is suffering and in pain. I don't think the needs of the parent should be considered over the suffering of the child and I think that is where each of the court decisions are coming from.

Great Ormand Street is a wonderful caring hospital who fight hard for the lives in their care. I don't think for one moment they would oppose the parents in court if they thought there was any hope or benefit to this child.

As to taking him home to die, again this is probably a decision with regard the welfare of this little boy and where it is better for him to be to have the least pain and suffering.

It's such a sad case but I don't believe the hospital is doing anything but putting his care first.
His parents have tried everything in their power to try and help Charlie, understandably so.
It is sad, but the doctors have to put his welfare first.
I can understand the parents anguish, nobody would find it easy to let their child go.
smudgie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote