View Single Post
Old 13-05-2018, 12:57 PM #11
Eddie. Eddie. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,701

Favourites (more):
BBUSA21: Kathryn
BBCanada 7: Dane
Eddie. Eddie. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,701

Favourites (more):
BBUSA21: Kathryn
BBCanada 7: Dane
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koadey View Post
Here is what I think could've happened.

Season 2: Dr. Will wins with no competition. If Monica made F3, the only upset is her winning due to losing her cousin. I don't fully believe that Dr. Will would've evicted first for being the most interesting, he was lightyears ahead of everyone in the charisma department than anybody from Season 1.

Season 3: Jason would be the typical "nice, white winner". Danielle would've been more of the "I'm a mom with two kids" type as opposed to the strategic villain she became.

Season 4: Jack probably wins because he was an older guy. It's possible David wins because he was entertaining, eye candy for the girls, and an army vet. Erika also makes it far since she was associated to these two.

Season 5: Toss up between Drew, who is the same case as Jason or Nakomis, one of the first underdogs to be popular and successful (besides Will). Jase and Diane would be interesting to see in this format to see if they make it far for being entertaining or instant burnouts.

Season 6: Kaysar wins with no competition, as he stood out as one of the most consistently popular players. Since Kaysar and Eric don't butt heads for strategic reasons, there's no division and the nominations would've been more cult-like with fans evicting whichever Nerd Herder was eventually nominated. There is a chance that since Janelle brought more entertainment that the fans ultimately line up to start supporting her.

Season 7: This isn't really up for debate because nobody with the right frame of mind would've agreed to return to the house knowing they'd lose to Kaysar or Janelle, who you couldn't technically do all-stars without. They'd have to consider making this a second chance season and even then, the cast would be very different. Assuming the same 14 who was on the season, the winner would be again, between Kaysar and Janelle, possibly whichever one of them who didn't win the year before.

Season 8: Toss-up between Evel Dick and maybe Jessica or Eric. Daniele also has a chance if Dick ended up evicting, as all of Dick's fans would cultivate to her.

Season 9: Toss up between Alex, Matty, or James. Alex and Matty would then become the same types of winners as Drew/Jason as James would become a Nakomis/Kaysar type winner.

Season 10: Toss-up between Dan and Keesha. It's also hard to tell because Brian could've entertained America all the way to $500k or be evicted for coming across as a try-hard, or Keesha or Dan could still come out on top. There were a lot of people who were heavily popular and in many eviction rounds, the vote could've gone either way.

Season 11: Jeff wins with no competition.

Season 12: Britany wins with no competition, especially since she wouldn't have needed a twist to help her get further in the game unlike Rachel would've needed.

Season 13: Same situation as Season 7, you couldn't get dynamic duos to return to the game unless you confirmed Jeff/Jordan weren't there. This twist wouldn't have even made sense in the UK format anyways. None of the new players wouldn't stood a chance nominated against a returning player. If they stuck with the same cast, either Jeff wins or their fans unite to give it to Jordan. Jeff could also campaigned over the feeds to give it to Jordan this time.

Season 14: If it contained returning players, it would still have to be four players who are all love-hate players (i.e. Rachel) and if Janelle, Britany, or Janelle won their previous seasons, they would've either declined because they'd assume nobody would vote for a 2-time winner or if Jeff won in 2011, America wouldn't award a two-time winner two years in a row. Of all of the new players, only Frank or Ian stand a chance.

Season 15: Either Elissa wins, not necessarily because she's Rachel's sister, but because the only person who could've ever been likable enough to surpass her in the final vote was Nick, who probably would've beat her. This is ironic considering that Elissa can win because she's Rachel's sister, Rachel couldn't win as she has no shot against Britany and wouldn't beat Jeff/Jordan, unless Jeff/Jordan were not offered a spot on Season 13.

Season 16. Donny wins with no competition, as everybody else would've been a try-hard. Donny probably gets nominated a whole lot and would've just survived nominations against the other misfits (Britany, Jacosta, etc). Derrick, Frankie, and Cody would've influenced the house strong enough that each of them would've avoided the vote and it would've felt very cult-like.

Season 17: Either Johnny Mac, James or Audrey win. Audrey has the upper-hand, but I feel it would've still been a matte of time that she would've still got caught up in the drama in the house and could've gotten a meltdown or even self-evict. The other upper-hand that Audrey, or even Da'Vonne or Vanessa could've had is that this is the year where the "female must win" movement started.

Season 18: Again, it would've still has to excluded James. Those who befriended the returning players make it to the end and the others go one right after the other, except for Natalie. As Natalie and James were both very popular, their disadvantage could be fans splitting the votes if they're in the end. If James wins Season 17, he likely loses Season 18 and either she, Nicole, or Da'Vonne win as apart of the "female must win" movement.

OTT: If broadcasted, Jason wins, unless they broadcasted his inappropriate comments towards Shelby. If not broadcasted, either Alex or Shelby win. If the final three was Alex, Shelby, & Jason, Alex and Shelby run into a problem as the Ball Smasher fans would be splitting votes.

Season 19. This would've still had a cult-like nominations feel, as the in crowd would consistently nominate the out crowd. Cody and Jess would've eventually challenged Paul, and the whole season would've still been Jody vs. Paul & Co, with Marlena picked off if nominated against Jess or Grodner trying to get one of the minions evicted instead of Paul. Jess Probably wins and even though there's a push for female winners, Jess wins because she became such an underdog and was more likable than her own allies.

Celeb BB: Ross wins with no competition.

So, in theory, it could work, but the later season would've been more related to forced showmances, people clinging up to returning players, which still doesn't make sense in this format, and we would've gotten more and WAY more try-hards and "Please don't evict me, I'm married with a wife & kids" (i.e. Derrick, Jason) and then, there's Frankie and Raven and these factors would've made the show look superficial. Social Media also would eventually play a huge part as previous houseguests could start campaigning for houseguests. For instance, Da'Vonne and Nicole could campaign on Social Media to save Paul and their fans may follow their lead. The more recent seasons would've been in crowd vs. out crowd over and over again.

Another factor is in the male-female win ratio could even be a bigger margin than it is now. Nakomis is the first female who could have any shot, and even then she is up against Drew. Then we have Janelle, Daniele/Jessica, and Keesha who are maybes. Britany is the only female who wins without too much competition from a man. All of them blonde, except Nakomis. Then, you have Elissa who has an advantage and not very many people in her season were likable enough to give her a run for her money. Then you have popular females from seasons 17, 18 & OTT who could win because there's been a push for female winners.

It is impossible to tell exactly what could happen, as we also have to consider penalty nominations and twists, not to mention theories of production interference.
Good points you have made there, Koadey, I wouldn’t be able to do such a full-on explanation just like that...
Eddie. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote