FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
01-09-2009, 08:36 AM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on'
keep the sponger in! Big Brother's saved tax payers a few hundred quid in dole money over the last few months. Hopefully, if she does win, the prize money will keep her in Rizlas for a few months. Siavash to win! - the only 'normal' person in there, and that's saying something lol |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 08:38 AM | #2 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Did she really say 'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on'
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 08:40 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Once again - she is employed and working in a job that generates massive cash for the economy.
Now.. ..if she signs on because she is legitimately out of work (she is about to be 'laid-off' as we say) then that is not unfair at all. I would have to believe plenty of BB HMs end up there, but, IF she is legitimate and is then looking for work then you cannot complain. But let me say it again - right now, she is employed in a position that generates huge cash in the economy. massive amounts. That doesn't mean anyone should deliberately avoid the next job either. I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 08:42 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510877&tid=145039&author=VickyJ]Did she really say 'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on' [/rquote]
Yeah it was when David said the job centre wouldn't let her because she'd been on big brother. you're not surprised are you, did you really think she had a job? Who would employ her? |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 09:15 AM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510884&tid=145039&author=ElProximo] .... I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. [/rquote]
I think we are on the same page of wanting her kept in, I doubt she'll be in 'massive tax-generating position' when she gets out |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 09:47 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510966&tid=145039&author=TT][rquote=2510884&tid=145039&author=ElProximo] .... I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. [/rquote]
I think we are on the same page of wanting her kept in, I doubt she'll be in 'massive tax-generating position' when she gets out [/rquote] No she wont. I suppose some HM's might see a magazine deal and that would count as employment. Suppose she gets 500 for some exclusive. She might possibly have some potential in some sort of Lesbian org/advert type of stuff or if there is a magazine for that, and, I will be pre-ordering the Nuts magazine that features her, but, I am saying that it might be 100% legitimate for many a BB HM to apply for benefits and would do so same as anyone else who has been let go from their job. Even if they do so as a 'matter of bureaucracy and paperwork obligation' but find something soon after. I am just saying it is not necessarily a bad thing or bad intention and doesn't mean (in itself) they do not intend to find a job soon as possible. People might assume I'm being sarcastic but in total seriousness I really wonder if a cigarette company would consider her in some advert? I have another serious proposal to her Agent which will sound strange but I believe would be massive: It looks like a typical Tea advert. Maybe a nice suburban kitchen table, sunshine etc. A nice attractive Mum with great long hair and lovely make-up sips and smiles her tea, but, (and don't point it out) she looks familiar. Wait.. was that Lisa from Big Brother wtf??? You know why - because with nice long hair and a bit of make-up Lisa is a damn fine looking woman. *non-speaking role btw. I promise EVERYONE will be talking about that advert. For months and even years. (also.. keep the 'subliminal idea' about how that Tea is so pleasure inducing, so 'relaxing' associated with the idea that Lisa is now this really pretty 'beautiful Mum' .. you get the idea) That is free btw. Or send me some free tea bags and its a deal |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 10:10 AM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
i think lisa and david will have jobs i dont like them bit i think there will
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 10:24 AM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510877&tid=145039&author=VickyJ]Did she really say 'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on' [/rquote]
She was actually complaining that she would have to fill in all the forms again, poor cow NOT |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 11:10 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Hopefully she will be out tonight.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 11:16 AM | #10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510871&tid=145039&author=TT]'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on'
keep the sponger in! Big Brother's saved tax payers a few hundred quid in dole money over the last few months. Hopefully, if she does win, the prize money will keep her in Rizlas for a few months. Siavash to win! - the only 'normal' person in there, and that's saying something lol [/rquote] Don't like Lisa but she is not as bad as the UK government who use our money to pay the EU 40million pounds A DAY for the privilege of being told what we can and cannot do...Lisa pales insignificance to this.. If you are Irish vote against the Lisbon treaty. Say no to the NWO |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 11:18 AM | #11 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
[rquote=2511064&tid=145039&author=SDAS][rquote=2510877&tid=145039&author=VickyJ]Did she really say 'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on' [/rquote]
She was actually complaining that she would have to fill in all the forms again, poor cow NOT[/rquote] Bloody hell |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 12:28 PM | #12 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511011&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2510966&tid=145039&author=TT][rquote=2510884&tid=145039&author=ElProximo] .... I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. [/rquote]
I think we are on the same page of wanting her kept in, I doubt she'll be in 'massive tax-generating position' when she gets out [/rquote] People might assume I'm being sarcastic but in total seriousness I really wonder if a cigarette company would consider her in some advert? [rquote] you really havent got a scooby doo re contemporary life have you dear err...since when was cigarette advertising allowed in uk? It was banned from TV in 1965...the mid 1980's and mid 1990's saw further restrictions. In 2001 almost all types of cigarette advertising was banned. This is just one more instance of you slavering pish all over the forums! LMFAO! |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 12:38 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
If my taxes we're not going to people like Lisa it would be going on, Mp expenses, probably a new ornament for a pond that cost's 2000 quid, so i'd rather it go to a poor scrounger than a rich one.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 12:47 PM | #14 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510871&tid=145039&author=TT]'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on'
keep the sponger in! Big Brother's saved tax payers a few hundred quid in dole money over the last few months. Hopefully, if she does win, the prize money will keep her in Rizlas for a few months. Siavash to win! - the only 'normal' person in there, and that's saying something lol [/rquote] she actually said she was going to the jobcentre she didnt mention signing on! i think lisa has learnt more int he house than anyone else and will re evaluate her life when she comes out |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 12:53 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
MissKittyFantastico
|
[rquote=2511591&tid=145039&author=lavabird][rquote=2510871&tid=145039&author=TT]'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on'
keep the sponger in! Big Brother's saved tax payers a few hundred quid in dole money over the last few months. Hopefully, if she does win, the prize money will keep her in Rizlas for a few months. Siavash to win! - the only 'normal' person in there, and that's saying something lol [/rquote] she actually said she was going to the jobcentre she didnt mention signing on! i think lisa has learnt more int he house than anyone else and will re evaluate her life when she comes out [/rquote] She did actually mention signing on, David told her she wouldn't be able to because of being in the house but she said she would, and would have to fill all the forms out all over again. I've always defended her when people call her a benefits cheat, and I still wouldn't call her that. Just downright ****ing lazy if that's her attitude. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 12:58 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511518&tid=145039&author=scot][rquote=2511011&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2510966&tid=145039&author=TT][rquote=2510884&tid=145039&author=ElProximo] .... I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. [/rquote]
I think we are on the same page of wanting her kept in, I doubt she'll be in 'massive tax-generating position' when she gets out [/rquote] People might assume I'm being sarcastic but in total seriousness I really wonder if a cigarette company would consider her in some advert? [rquote] you really havent got a scooby doo re contemporary life have you dear err...since when was cigarette advertising allowed in uk? It was banned from TV in 1965...the mid 1980's and mid 1990's saw further restrictions. In 2001 almost all types of cigarette advertising was banned. This is just one more instance of you slavering pish all over the forums! LMFAO![/rquote] Duly note according to Wiki (and as evidence by cigarette adverts in several of my UK magazines published recently) and by the smoking adverts sent to my inbox twice weekly.. -Several exemptions from this legislation remain: * Advertisements that appear within the tobacco industry * Advertisements in publications that are not primarily aimed at a British audience * Advertisements in pubs, clubs and shops, as long as the advert's total size does not exceed that of an A5 piece of paper, with 30% of that being taken up by government health warnings.[31] * Advertisements other than those for cigarettes or hand-rolling tobacco within specialist tobacconists if the sale of cigars, snuff, pipe tobacco and smoking accessories accounts for over 50% of their sales * Direct mail that has been specifically requested Even if I was behind the times on smoking adverts that does not 'go to show' anything else, but, as usual I am correct and you were wrong. Please stop being wrong. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 01:09 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511630&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2511518&tid=145039&author=scot][rquote=2511011&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2510966&tid=145039&author=TT][rquote=2510884&tid=145039&author=ElProximo] .... I'm just saying right now she is a massive tax-generating position in this job. [/rquote]
I think we are on the same page of wanting her kept in, I doubt she'll be in 'massive tax-generating position' when she gets out [/rquote] People might assume I'm being sarcastic but in total seriousness I really wonder if a cigarette company would consider her in some advert? [rquote] you really havent got a scooby doo re contemporary life have you dear err...since when was cigarette advertising allowed in uk? It was banned from TV in 1965...the mid 1980's and mid 1990's saw further restrictions. In 2001 almost all types of cigarette advertising was banned. This is just one more instance of you slavering pish all over the forums! LMFAO![/rquote] Duly note according to Wiki (and as evidence by cigarette adverts in several of my UK magazines published recently) and by the smoking adverts sent to my inbox twice weekly.. -Several exemptions from this legislation remain: * Advertisements that appear within the tobacco industry * Advertisements in publications that are not primarily aimed at a British audience * Advertisements in pubs, clubs and shops, as long as the advert's total size does not exceed that of an A5 piece of paper, with 30% of that being taken up by government health warnings.[31] * Advertisements other than those for cigarettes or hand-rolling tobacco within specialist tobacconists if the sale of cigars, snuff, pipe tobacco and smoking accessories accounts for over 50% of their sales * Direct mail that has been specifically requested Even if I was behind the times on smoking adverts that does not 'go to show' anything else, but, as usual I am correct and you were wrong. Please stop being wrong. [/rquote] ha ha ha ha ha ha...need to get my breath back....phewww. Those advertising avenues are negligible re sales revenue...why do you think the tobbaco industry fought so hard to retain 'purposeful' advertising. hmmm...lets just have a look at them again: * Advertisements that appear within the tobacco industry * Advertisements in publications that are not primarily aimed at a British audience * Advertisements in pubs, clubs and shops, as long as the advert's total size does not exceed that of an A5 piece of paper, with 30% of that being taken up by government health warnings.[31] * Advertisements other than those for cigarettes or hand-rolling tobacco within specialist tobacconists if the sale of cigars, snuff, pipe tobacco and smoking accessories accounts for over 50% of their sales * Direct mail that has been specifically requested OMG...you just walk right into it dont you El poxo...you dunno when your beat and when to slink off. Yeah I can see all the tobbaco companies aka Phillip Morris etc 'using' Lisa as part of their adevrtising campaigns. Her mug on billbaords in china? her mug on internal tobacco company memorandum? a passport size pic of her in pubs with the message SMOKING KILLS? A tiny pic of her smoking a pipe!!!! OMG!! LMFAO!!! A pic of her on specifically requested direct mail sniffing snuff!!! You need to lie down and re-plan your ideas re Lisa's career as a ciggy advertisment. You are beyond any doubt feckin LOOPED!!! I'm pishin myself laughing as i type this....OMG!!!! |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 01:22 PM | #18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
what El proxo?...you not replying to my incisive post re your slavers! Is that you away now, school bell just went aye? Okay then ta ta for now sweetie. See you later on aye? anytime baby, anytime.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 01:34 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511754&tid=145039&author=scot]what El proxo?...you not replying to my incisive post re your slavers! Is that you away now, school bell just went aye? Okay then ta ta for now sweetie. See you later on aye? anytime baby, anytime.
[/rquote] Uhh.. now you are 'taunting' to cover up your embarrassment or something. Interesting. Please make posts that actually discuss something. Anything. You are 'this close' to being reduced to huge blocks of 'frownies'. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 01:51 PM | #20 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511807&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2511754&tid=145039&author=scot]what El proxo?...you not replying to my incisive post re your slavers! Is that you away now, school bell just went aye? Okay then ta ta for now sweetie. See you later on aye? anytime baby, anytime.
[/rquote] Uhh.. now you are 'taunting' to cover up your embarrassment or something. Interesting. Please make posts that actually discuss something. Anything. You are 'this close' to being reduced to huge blocks of 'frownies'. [/rquote] eh?...my post was a direct response to the nonsense you were dribbling re lisa and tobacco and etc. In fact whenever we get involved in these exchanges i always best you and it is you who try to steer things of course as your primitive and insubstantial 'arguments and claims' are always very quickly decimated by me. I'm trying hard not to 'taunt' honest, but it's just YOU DO tend to illicit the type of responses that perhaps seem scathing. But that is only because almost everything you post is laugh out loud 'mental'. I really am laughing very hard when i read and reply to your stuff. Erm...could you explain this: You are 'this close' to being reduced to huge blocks of 'frownies'. I have no clue what that 'means', is if indeed it means anything? |
||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 11:06 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2511885&tid=145039&author=scot][rquote=2511807&tid=145039&author=ElProximo][rquote=2511754&tid=145039&author=scot]what El proxo?...you not replying to my incisive post re your slavers! Is that you away now, school bell just went aye? Okay then ta ta for now sweetie. See you later on aye? anytime baby, anytime.
[/rquote] Uhh.. now you are 'taunting' to cover up your embarrassment or something. Interesting. Please make posts that actually discuss something. Anything. You are 'this close' to being reduced to huge blocks of 'frownies'. [/rquote] eh?...my post was a direct response to the nonsense you were dribbling re lisa and tobacco and etc. In fact whenever we get involved in these exchanges i always best you and it is you who try to steer things of course as your primitive and insubstantial 'arguments and claims' are always very quickly decimated by me. I'm trying hard not to 'taunt' honest, but it's just YOU DO tend to illicit the type of responses that perhaps seem scathing. But that is only because almost everything you post is laugh out loud 'mental'. I really am laughing very hard when i read and reply to your stuff. Erm...could you explain this: You are 'this close' to being reduced to huge blocks of 'frownies'. I have no clue what that 'means', is if indeed it means anything?[/rquote] Allowed: * Advertisements that appear within the tobacco industry * Advertisements in publications that are not primarily aimed at a British audience * Advertisements in pubs, clubs and shops, as long as the advert's total size does not exceed that of an A5 piece of paper, with 30% of that being taken up by government health warnings.[31] * Advertisements other than those for cigarettes or hand-rolling tobacco within specialist tobacconists if the sale of cigars, snuff, pipe tobacco and smoking accessories accounts for over 50% of their sales * Direct mail that has been specifically requested Target audience: Me. In my Magazines and in my bi-weekly tobacco 'e-flyers', and, If you don't think that is big business then you (once again) have no idea what is happening. Its massive. I personally know the dude at dutyfreedepot (this is only the small Canadian market) is going mad trying to keep up despite hiring more staff. Where do you think I get my L&Ms from? multi multi million dollar business. Look into it. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
01-09-2009, 11:09 PM | #22 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2510890&tid=145039&author=TT][rquote=2510877&tid=145039&author=VickyJ]Did she really say 'As soon as I get out I'm going to sign on' [/rquote]
Yeah it was when David said the job centre wouldn't let her because she'd been on big brother. you're not surprised are you, did you really think she had a job? Who would employ her?[/rquote] I'm pretty sure she said she's going straight down the job centre when she gets out...didn't hear anything about signing on... |
||
Reply With Quote |
02-09-2009, 01:20 AM | #23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
LISA EVICTED TO LOUD BOOS!
Take that, miserable Lisa fanboys and fangirls! I laugh in your face, hahahaha!!!! |
||
Reply With Quote |
02-09-2009, 01:29 AM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Platinum Member
|
Quote:
At a time of high unemployment a butch, tattooed and pierced lesbian is not exactly going to be regarded as god's gift by any employer. (As someone who's job is recruitment, I can assure everyone of that!!) She has made herself practically unemployable - maybe even deliberately? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
02-09-2009, 01:30 AM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Platinum Member
|
Quote:
At a time of high unemployment a butch, tattooed and pierced lesbian is not exactly going to be regarded as god's gift by any employer. Especially if they've seen her on BB. (As someone who's job is recruitment, I can assure everyone of that!!) She has made herself practically unemployable - maybe even deliberately? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|