Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26-01-2011, 09:31 AM #1
LeatherTrumpet's Avatar
LeatherTrumpet LeatherTrumpet is offline
The voice of reason
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 94,898


LeatherTrumpet LeatherTrumpet is offline
The voice of reason
LeatherTrumpet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 94,898


Default You could not make it up

A career criminal who killed a policeman in a hit-and-run then boasted, 'one down, 500 to go' was labelled 'low-life scum' by his victim's family today.
Stephen Benson, 25, had been asked to destroy the car for an insurance scam but mowed down off-duty officer Mike Silcock hours after taking the BMW M3, Manchester Crown Court heard.

Today, Benson, from Stockport, was jailed for four years and two months after admitting causing death by careless driving on March 6, 2009, and conspiracy to commit fraud. He was also disqualified from driving for five years.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1C8V2C9bO
LeatherTrumpet is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-01-2011, 05:12 PM #2
BB_Eye's Avatar
BB_Eye BB_Eye is offline
Nothing in excess
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 7,496
BB_Eye BB_Eye is offline
Nothing in excess
BB_Eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Here
Posts: 7,496
Default

For some reason or other, the British legal system doesn't regard unrepentant thugs as deserving of punishment and feel more inclined to blame the victims most of the time. The same goes for rapists, who routinely get let off scot free, much less getting the sentence they deserve.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off?
- Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis

BB_Eye is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-01-2011, 05:31 PM #3
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun Shaun is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 106,245

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Yinrun
RPDR UK 2: Tayce


Shaun Shaun is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 106,245

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Yinrun
RPDR UK 2: Tayce


Default

The fact Tommy Sheridan got 3 years for lying in comparison to this is rather sad.
__________________
Spoiler:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saph View Post
You're giving me a million reasons about a million reasons

Shaun is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 26-01-2011, 05:54 PM #4
MTVN's Avatar
MTVN MTVN is offline
All hail the Moyesiah
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Country
Posts: 56,885

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Lewis G


MTVN MTVN is offline
All hail the Moyesiah
MTVN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Country
Posts: 56,885

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Noky
BB19: Lewis G


Default

According to the article death by careless driving carries a maximum sentance of 5 years

Death by dangerous driving carries a maximum sentance of 14 years

Is the difference between the two so great? Surely if you're driving carelessly, you are being dangerous
MTVN is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-01-2011, 05:33 AM #5
Claymores's Avatar
Claymores Claymores is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,857


Claymores Claymores is offline
Senior Member
Claymores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,857


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
The fact Tommy Sheridan got 3 years for lying in comparison to this is rather sad.
Excellent point. A bloke who killed 3 pedestrians just outside where I live by crahing his Subaru Impeza into them while drunk has got 3 years and a 5 year driving ban.

WTF? should have been so much more.

JACK TWEED - nuff said
Claymores is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-01-2011, 05:53 PM #6
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 168,052
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 168,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claymores View Post
Excellent point. A bloke who killed 3 pedestrians just outside where I live by crahing his Subaru Impeza into them while drunk has got 3 years and a 5 year driving ban.

WTF? should have been so much more.

JACK TWEED - nuff said


Yes maybe they will review it
arista is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-01-2011, 06:20 PM #7
Claymores's Avatar
Claymores Claymores is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,857


Claymores Claymores is offline
Senior Member
Claymores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,857


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post
Yes maybe they will review it
The alternative way of thinking of it is to hope he gets screwed royally up the ass multiple times every day for 3 years
Claymores is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-01-2011, 06:24 PM #8
Shasown's Avatar
Shasown Shasown is offline
Account Vacant
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In my house.
Posts: 9,351
Shasown Shasown is offline
Account Vacant
Shasown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In my house.
Posts: 9,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN View Post
According to the article death by careless driving carries a maximum sentance of 5 years

Death by dangerous driving carries a maximum sentance of 14 years

Is the difference between the two so great? Surely if you're driving carelessly, you are being dangerous
In laymans terms:

Careless driving is the standard of driving which falls below the expected standard of a competent driver.

Dangerous driving is the standard of driving which falls FAR below the expected standard of a competent driver.


The police would probably charge with the more serious charge of dangerous, depending on the evidence at the time they charge the person.

The CPS would follow through on that charge or reduce/increase it depending on the evidence the police sent them and any follow up evidence obtained

But in the end it would the Jury or Magistrate/Sheriff decided as to how far below the standard the person accused fell.
Shasown is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
make


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts