About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Jessica. · 13-08-2019, 05:07 PM

That's a great idea, red meat is really bad for us anyway. I hope more places do the same.

UserSince2005 · 13-08-2019, 05:08 PM

Ill have double for them

Jessica. · 13-08-2019, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

Beef farmers seem to be a soft target

I saw a picture of FB of all the airplanes over Europe at any given time, but its the cows that are killing us

That's because the process of using animals for food damages the environment far more than transport does.

Kizzy · 13-08-2019, 06:08 PM

Very ethical can't fault it, haven't eaten beef for a long time.

Marsh. · 13-08-2019, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

I'm sure you saying that will be of great comfort to beef farmers

Good?

The world evolves, as do industries. Yes, it's sad for people whose businesses close or change, but such is life.

Marsh. · 13-08-2019, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I'm not an expert on the subject, but do you really think that people stop eating Beef is really gonna make that much of a difference to the planet when peoples lifestyles are killing the planet in so many different and deadly ways?

I'm not meaning to be confrontational btw if it's coming across that way, it's just a genuine question.

That's suggesting they believe stopping eating beef is the sole action the world needs to make. They don't.

It's one building block in a wall of many building blocks. All one small part, but necessary, of the larger whole.

(-1000 points for whoever makes a 'wall' joke)

MTVN · 13-08-2019, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie

That still doesn't change the fact that beef farmers are a soft target, I know a bit about this as my brother is one and there are a lot of things going on that are actually bringing the industry to its knees, the way things are going it wont matter if there isn't a planet because food will be in short supply as farmers go out of business

Exactly, there's an obvious cost to moves like this. The farming industry might not seem very important to people living in cities or in suburbia but it's critical to our nation's food supply and to rural communities in general.

I don't agree with dictating people's diets either and this rush to condemn anyone who dissents from the extreme eco doctrine

Marsh. · 13-08-2019, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

Exactly, there's an obvious cost to moves like this. The farming industry might not seem very important to people living in cities or in suburbia but it's critical to our nation's food supply and to rural communities in general.

It's a gradual change to improvement. No one's suggesting close down all the farms now overnight.

parmnion · 13-08-2019, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan.

All of them if we don’t do anything.

Besides, why are you asking me, it was BOTS who said we should let those countries ‘fall into oblivion’ to reduce global warming

You said the countries with the lowest carbon footprint would be the first to die ..or words to that extent..I want to know what countries so I can research it.

Marsh. · 13-08-2019, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

You said the countries with the lowest carbon footprint would be the first to die ..or words to that extent..I want to know what countries so I can research it.

Then research countries with a low carbon footprint.

MTVN · 13-08-2019, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's a gradual change to improvement. No one's suggesting close down all the farms now overnight.

Well literally banning beef would do that to many if everyone followed this lead

If we want a gradual change to improvement then there's a lot you could do short of outright banning something. Eating more British beef would help for a start and reducing reliance on imported meat

parmnion · 13-08-2019, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica.

That's a great idea, red meat is really bad for us anyway. I hope more places do the same.

Red meat is very good for us...where did you hear it wasn't?

Cherie · 13-08-2019, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

Well literally banning beef would do that to many if everyone followed this lead

If we want a gradual change to improvement then there's a lot you could do short of outright banning something. Eating more British beef would help for a start and reducing reliance on imported meat

yes buying British would do a lot more good, I would like to have a look in Goldsmiths kitchens and see where the produce they use in their restaurants are coming from

bitontheslide · 13-08-2019, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morgan.

All of them if we don’t do anything.

Besides, why are you asking me, it was BOTS who said we should let those countries ‘fall into oblivion’ to reduce global warming

that's not what I said at all, i didn't say we should do nothing I stated clearly that it needed to be based an all countries industrial output because thats what makes the biggest difference.

The countries that will suffer will be the ones that already experience severe climate variations as they will get worse ... and anyone close to sea level. It's not dictated by who is carbon neutral and who is not

parmnion · 13-08-2019, 06:51 PM

You could walk into the kitchen of that uni and find 100 items with a larger carbon footprint than 1 beef burger...

This is just a veggie run student union type thing having to much of a say in the day to day running of the uni...

This

Marsh. · 13-08-2019, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

Well literally banning beef would do that to many if everyone followed this lead

If we want a gradual change to improvement then there's a lot you could do short of outright banning something. Eating more British beef would help for a start and reducing reliance on imported meat

One university not using beef is not going to make a drastic change. So, yes, it remains gradual.