[arista]

Farage was Live on both News Channels
he he taking his Fight
to Labour

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Here's another example.

Isn't that something to do with how it would be implemented? Labour want to do it instantly while the Tories want to do it gradually?

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Nuclear weapons are a deterrent. It's not hard to understand. I would much rather have a prime minister who is prepared to use them than one who would invite the invading enemy in for a coffee and a chat

Of Course
But Corbyn is against any War.
That's the only solid issue.

[Cherie]

Farage is standing down his candidates

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Farage is standing down his candidates

Arise Lord Farage. Told you

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Farage is standing down his candidates

Yes in Conservative zones


But he will Fight Labour in some zones

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Arise Lord Farage. Told you

No one cares
about that
but you

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Farage is standing down his candidates

only the ones previously won by tories (cause he wouldnt win them). They are still fighting in the labour seats

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Of Course
But Corbyn is against any War.
That's the only solid issue.

You've gone from saying he must be prepared to use nukes, to him being against generic war, all in less than an hour. You're giving me whiplash.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You've gone from saying he must be prepared to use nukes, to him being against generic war, all in less than an hour. You're giving me whiplash.

Of Course he must use them in Defense
IF he is our PM

Corbyn
will get stuck on the live TV Debates
first one on ITV1HD
next week (Tues 19th Nov)

[Livia]

So, Farage isn't going to split the Tory vote. Doesn't bode well for Labour. Unless the LibDems make a similar offer... which they won't.

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You've gone from saying he must be prepared to use nukes, to him being against generic war, all in less than an hour. You're giving me whiplash.

both do apply, that's why. He has stated on numerous occasions that he is a pacifist

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

No one cares
about that
but you

Of course. Same reason you don't care about election law breaking, about Russian funding, about Johnsons racism, about his homophobia. I'm sure if it was Corbyn and Swinson doing this, you'd be telling me that no one cares.

[arista]

No Paul
we get Johnson PM.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

So, Farage isn't going to split the Tory vote. Doesn't bode well for Labour. Unless the LibDems make a similar offer... which they won't.

Yes and Farage will Fight Labour
in some zones

[arista]

[Nigel Farage has stood down more
than 300 Brexit Party candidates
in seats won by the Conservatives
in the 2017 election.
Mr Farage said his party had
made the decision based on polling
which indicated standing in
seats in London, the South and the South West
may split the vote of pro-Brexit candidates
and allow pro-Remain candidates to win.
Therefore the Brexit Party won't contest
any of the 317 seats won by
the Conservatives in the last general election.]

https://news.sky.com/story/general-e...-2017-11859370

[bitontheslide]

this actually isnt that good for the tories. The brexit party will be fighting the marginal seats lost by the tories at the last election and the tories need them to get a majority

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

this actually isnt that good for the tories. The brexit party will be fighting the marginal seats lost by the tories at the last election and the tories need them to get a majority

317 seats Conservative
held are not having Brexit Party Contenders.


It is Good news



Bad News for Labour
as Farage is Going against them

[The Slim Reaper]

[arista]

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Nuclear weapons are a deterrent. It's not hard to understand. I would much rather have a prime minister who is prepared to use them than one who would invite the invading enemy in for a coffee and a chat

We have them.. that is not the issue. We won't be getting rid if them that is not for any one leader to decide in a democracy.
Let me get this straight, in your hypothetical you would forgo diplomacy and go straight for the nukes, that is preferable to you, is that what you are telling me?
No negotiation, just kill 100s of thousands of innocent people. Can you see how irrational that looks and sounds?

[bitontheslide]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

We have them.. that is not the issue. We won't be getting rid if them that is not for any one leader to decide in a democracy.
Let me get this straight, in your hypothetical you would forgo diplomacy and go straight for the nukes, that is preferable to you, is that what you are telling me?
No negotiation, just kill 100s of thousands of innocent people. Can you see how irrational that looks and sounds?

i really wish you would follow someone other than me around the forum

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Here's another example.

My guess is boris intends to follow the ' walmart principle' raise wages but remove all other contracted rights.

Corbyns proposal is not acceptable as it raises wages without any need for the contractual change that allows employers to exploit their workforce.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i really wish you would follow someone other than me around the forum

De ja vu!... I post all over and quote lots of people, you're not special bots. Theres no onus on you to reply if you don't wish to.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes in Conservative zones


But he will Fight Labour in some zones

So much for not working together, this is a calculated pincer movement. Is this constitutional I wonder?