FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
05-09-2023, 03:38 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
When a nomination/eviction/immunity twist comes in, it depends on how much the beholder likes the HM on whether or not it's a fix to keep them in
But to avoid accusations, do you think a list of upcoming twists should be released, but not officially announced for those who want to be surprised, for transparency? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2023, 03:47 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
I think so, i hate over manipulation
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2023, 06:27 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I would like them announced before that week’s nominations take place.
C5 BB (and even late C4 BB in some instances)‘s manipulation was so obvious at times that it ruined the enjoyment of the show. I understand them wanting to keep good housemates in over bad ones but it should be a fair format and seen through regardless of the results of the nominations. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2023, 06:28 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I don’t mind the odd twist to manipulate the series but I’d rather it announced ahead of time rather than once nominations have been done. Eg. At the end of the eviction show on a Friday AJ and Will announce the following weeks twist even though noms won’t take place for a few days yet.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-09-2023, 08:35 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
If the twist is announced after the nominations then it's a fix.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-09-2023, 08:38 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Difficult one, the GBP love to get a villian out, thats great but then it can impact the rest of the series if there is no one to fill the void
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-09-2023, 09:05 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Quote:
Even if the producers are doing it because they can see certain nominations coming, announcing a twist before the noms happen does stink a whole lot less. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-09-2023, 09:07 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes give a week
to vote |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-09-2023, 07:47 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I love the odd week when EVERYONE is up for eviction.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-09-2023, 08:27 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-09-2023, 09:19 AM | #11 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
Yes, we should know about them.
But not too many twists.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-09-2023, 12:26 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
God Save The Rave
|
I honestly think the thing that would solve most of the problems is having no head-to-heads. Minimum 3 (or even 4) in every vote makes vote manipulation much harder, twists or no twists.
Also vote to save over vote to evict. Frustrating as it can be ... it ultimately always makes for a more entertaining show, and culls some of the boring characters earlier. You need a good "mix" with some slightly bland ones still in there or it all gets a bit much, BUT if they keep nominations simple (not so many twists, not putting people up for failing a task or crap like that) you'll inevitably have a few "nicey nicey" characters who dodge nomination right until the end. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-09-2023, 01:19 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes, only 2 up means that a larger group can pick off a smaller group 1 by 1.
With 3 up a smaller group can put up one of the larger group and if viewers don't like the larger group they can knock them down to size. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-09-2023, 11:41 AM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Housemate
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-09-2023, 02:28 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Remember when they released the eviction vote tally halfway through the week one year just to make sure the person who had the most votes at that point, didn't go home
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|