FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
04-09-2009, 11:42 PM | #26 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542399&tid=146578&author=Shasown]Up until the lines closed for the first time voting would have been close for the top 2-3 if rodders got 11% for the 5[/quote]
I still think Sophie had over 40% at that stage. But obviously in the 45 mins when it was her vs Vash, she pulled away more and more. Fans of others + Vash haters bumped it to 74.4% [quote]Voting lines reopened, was the cumulative total kept or did the count start again(remember BB decides the way they are counted so long as the verifier agrees with the numbers given they havent done anything wrong)[/rquote] They obviously keep their votes before the 40 mins where it's Sophie vs Vash. You can't win BB just by getting more votes in a 40 min period! It's a running total, you don't restart anything. That would be illegal, you'd be ditching people's votes up until that point. |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-09-2009, 11:45 PM | #27 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542256&tid=146578&author=MiuMiu]74.4% Against Siavash made me cry ttears of pure joy.
[/rquote] Me too, i was soo happy |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-09-2009, 11:48 PM | #28 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542616&tid=146578&author=biglover][rquote=2542256&tid=146578&author=MiuMiu]74.4% Against Siavash made me cry ttears of pure joy.
[/rquote] Me too, i was soo happy[/rquote] I was just relieved ... and happy that Davina hates him too. Can't blame her AT ALL! |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-09-2009, 11:52 PM | #29 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542648&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004][rquote=2542616&tid=146578&author=biglover][rquote=2542256&tid=146578&author=MiuMiu]74.4% Against Siavash made me cry ttears of pure joy.
[/rquote] Me too, i was soo happy[/rquote] I was just relieved ... and happy that Davina hates him too. Can't blame her AT ALL! [/rquote] Wonderful stuff. So thankful that he didn't win. Sophie is not the greatest winner for me but anyone would have done in place of him. |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-09-2009, 11:58 PM | #30 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542685&tid=146578&author=setanta]
Wonderful stuff. So thankful that he didn't win. Sophie is not the greatest winner for me but anyone would have done in place of him.[/rquote] It's just because the final 5 were poor. I mean David got 3rd, probs close in % terms to Siavash. If David got 19% in the 3 way, what did Siavash get? I'd guess about 23-24%. Leaving Sophie with the other 56-57%. She then pulled away further to 74.4% against Siavash. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:01 AM | #31 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542732&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004][rquote=2542685&tid=146578&author=setanta]
Wonderful stuff. So thankful that he didn't win. Sophie is not the greatest winner for me but anyone would have done in place of him.[/rquote] It's just because the final 5 were poor. I mean David got 3rd, probs close in % terms to Siavash. If David got 19% in the 3 way, what did Siavash get? I'd guess about 23-24%. Leaving Sophie with the other 56-57%. She then pulled away further to 74.4% against Siavash.[/rquote] I think there probably was an awful lot of phonecalls made after it came down to Sophie and Siavash. Think it was a case of people making sure that a drip didn't win Big Brother. Well, I hope so anyway. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:06 AM | #32 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542757&tid=146578&author=setanta]
I think there probably was an awful lot of phonecalls made after it came down to Sophie and Siavash. Think it was a case of people making sure that a drip didn't win Big Brother. Well, I hope so anyway.[/rquote] Yes definitely, it made me vote for Sophie anyway. In reality it was tight between 2nd to 5th and a runaway 1st place. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:09 AM | #33 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. It would be a good investment. However she did seem really surprised to win.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:10 AM | #34 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542822&tid=146578&author=santaa]Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. It would be a good investment. However she did seem really surprised to win.[/rquote]
She didn't realise how fickle the public are, she believed that it would be hard to change their opinion after she was booed on entry. In reality, it only takes 1 or 2 HL shows to turn things completely around, ROFL. Fickle public. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:11 AM | #35 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542801&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004][rquote=2542757&tid=146578&author=setanta]
I think there probably was an awful lot of phonecalls made after it came down to Sophie and Siavash. Think it was a case of people making sure that a drip didn't win Big Brother. Well, I hope so anyway.[/rquote] Yes definitely, it made me vote for Sophie anyway. In reality it was tight between 2nd to 5th and a runaway 1st place.[/rquote] Yeah, I'd say it was very tight between the other 4. With David coming 3rd there mustn't have been much between them all. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:11 AM | #36 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. Good investment. With viewing figures so low ,voting figures low.Feasible to buy a win
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:15 AM | #37 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2542837&tid=146578&author=santaa]Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. Good investment. With viewing figures so low ,voting figures low.Feasible to buy a win[/rquote]
I wish they realised the figures, but they withhold them from public viewing due to embarassment! |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:23 AM | #38 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Im glad i ain't the only one to notice how boring Siavash is. How he beat Marcus is simply beyond me and will go down as one of the all time shocks in reality TV. He didn't deserve to be in the final. He kept playing the bloody game the whole way up until it was annouced who won with the whole you first, me 2nd thing.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:24 AM | #39 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2542866&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004][rquote=2542837&tid=146578&author=santaa]Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. Good investment. With viewing figures so low ,voting figures low.Feasible to buy a win[/rquote]
I wish they realised the figures, but they withhold them from public viewing due to embarassment! [/rquote] 8m voted in week 1 of BB3 alone 6m voted for Nadia to win in BB5 22m voted in BB7 2m voted altogether in BB8 3m voted altogether in BB9 Don't expect to find out the number for BB10. They released that info via how much they gave to charity |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:25 AM | #40 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:28 AM | #41 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Wow, interesting stuff. She was head and shoulders above the rest really. Makes me wonder how Freddie and Marcus would have done if they had made the final.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:29 AM | #42 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
[rquote=2542866&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004][rquote=2542837&tid=146578&author=santaa]Seems very high. Maybe she has a backer. Good investment. With viewing figures so low ,voting figures low.Feasible to buy a win[/rquote]
I wish they realised the figures, but they withhold them from public viewing due to embarassment! [/rquote] No due to the fact that they decide how to read the scores, so long as the legitimate figures are released, either as a cumulative total or as a winner per section doesnt matter. Same as last year a total breakdown of the actual voting figures wasnt released till after complaints to ofcom, Ofcom said the figures released had been correct. Not the aspect in how they had been correct. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 12:30 AM | #43 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 01:11 AM | #44 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
[rquote=2542935&tid=146578&author=AhmedFan2004]Weighted figures guys ...
http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/bi...ted-by-bbo.htm[/rquote] Innaccurate weighted figures, how can you adjust charlies and rodrigos by such gross differences when the count for them was stopped at the same time. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-09-2009, 10:12 PM | #45 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2543140&tid=146578&author=Shasown]
Innaccurate weighted figures, how can you adjust charlies and rodrigos by such gross differences when the count for them was stopped at the same time.[/rquote] BBO corrected their article. Bottom line, 2nd to 5th was tight, Sophie wins by landslide. |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|