FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-04-2010, 08:23 PM | #76 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
Quote:
I know what I'm talking about WOMBAI, don't worry. I'm far from being thick.
__________________
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:23 PM | #77 | |||
|
||||
V.I.P
|
Um I think Religion is a **** thing and we should all **** and forget about gods and just stop with it.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:28 PM | #78 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
Last edited by WOMBAI; 04-04-2010 at 08:33 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:31 PM | #79 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
Quote:
This also applies to charity. There are people who do that because it's needed and we need people like them. It's just not for me.
__________________
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:32 PM | #80 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I also don't get why smoking while driving is legal.. it's probably as dangerous/distracting as using a phone at the wheel.
__________________
BB11 faves; Ben, John James, Josie, Andrew
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:46 PM | #81 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
However you are now talking about disparity across the whole of the EU, and that whole situation has now changed with the inclusion of Czech Republic, Romania, Lithuania etc. Those countries will receive the lions share of funds in the future. And the thing is, they are in the EU currently, Scotland if it goes it alone may not be. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:51 PM | #82 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
As for smoking while driving, there is nothing wrong with that, what gets me is the idiots trying to distract me with thier lights and horns while driving and rolling my cigarettes. Non smokers should move away, how inconsiderate of them to expect smokers to move, we are the ones with reduced lung capacity, poor circulation and inefficient cardio vascular systems Last edited by Shasown; 04-04-2010 at 08:54 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:53 PM | #83 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:54 PM | #84 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 08:58 PM | #85 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 09:00 PM | #86 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Its not just scotland they could decline membership to, everyone thinks its a given thing, however its not the UK was accepted in and if scotland became independent they would have to apply for membership same as any other country wanting to enter, but the most important thing to remember is it could also mean that the rest of the UK (England Wales and Northern Ireland) could and should also face the same application. If collectively the UK have upset enough European countries in the past and they decide to hold it against us the whole of the UK could be out.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 09:08 PM | #87 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 09:33 PM | #88 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
Now have a look at this: http://news.scotsman.com/scottishind...-to.3328377.jp Now this, yes i know its from a unionist website, but the points are clear and fair. http://www.scottishunionist.com/2008...debatable.html Now this, no not all of it, just scroll down to the part headed scotland and read the 8th paragraph. http://www.ukpac.org/sunningdale290108.htm And the answer to why spain would possibly veto Scotlands application - The EU Common Fisheries Policy. If Scotland was to be allowed in to the EU as an independant nation it could claim back fishing grounds that the UK traded during the last 30 years. Spain would use a threatened veto against Scotland to ensure they made some sort of commitment not to claim the fishing rights back. Look at the problems Greenland had when trying to get of the EU private members club and that was all based around the fishing policy. Would Salmond and co agree to that precondition? And would he also agree to conversion to the euro? Now what was it you said? Oh yes "this seriously is a uniquely whacky view, and not one I've EVER encountered before" Not so wacky a view after all. There are other articles in the newspapers and on the net still arguing the same case, now Salmond loves to put across how well Scotland would do in the European Union, thing is being in the Union isnt guaranteed. A fact he always plays down. Last edited by Shasown; 04-04-2010 at 09:36 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 09:48 PM | #89 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I beg to differ - the theoretical is already partly negotiated if you speak to senior Scottish politicians and Scottish Office Officials - would involve some concessions. Taking the Euro was never a concession as the SNP have wanted that all along, as have many Scots to assist in the process of divorcing/differentiating from the nation of England & Wales
Pulling up bits from a Unionist Website seems quite frankly desperate. Do you have an agenda for Unionism? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 10:20 PM | #90 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
THERE is no precedent of a member state breaking up, which means the issue of an independent Scotland's position within the EU is under speculation. If you think about it Spain will veto it on the grounds of the problems it will cause with separatists in its north. Look at the problems with Kosovo. Plus Salmond has already stated he would withdraw from the CFP, not a wise statement given he has claimed Scotland will get straight in but the EU itself has not stated this is the case, they refuse to comment on hypothetical cases. As for your statement that things have already been partly negotiated, care to provide something concrete to back that up? And would it really be wise to join the Euro seeing the problems the recent Greek financial crisis caused? You say many Scots, is that backed by statistical analysis, any research? International case law favours the notion that the larger entity in a political break-up is usually designated the inheritor of all treaty obligations. This would therefore leave Scottish ministers having to negotiate not just membership of the EU, but of the United Nations and the WTO. However, many argue it would not benefit the EU to fracture borders, at a time when it is engaged in enlargement. ( http://news.scotsman.com/europeanuni...for.3589518.jp ) Actually it would be far easier for the EU to simply state, yeah you can be an independant nation however we will deal with you through the UK. As for the case that they will sail straight into Europe, as many times as he and Sturgeon keep giving the same old garbage, they dont and cant state it as given. Just because other members of their party say it will be so doesnt mean it really will be. He can state it, but you will notice senior European Official also state the opposite. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 10:35 PM | #91 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
One other point you should bear in mind, its not really Scotlands Oil, most of belongs in the Shetland Basin so technically its Shetlands Oil, the shetlanders are a strange bunch and in reality are more Nordic than Celtic.
I seem to recall that when the UK moved towards the Common Market in the 70's an independence movement sprang up that stated it would prefer to go it alone like its Norwegian brothers rather than its Scottish cousins, so when you open the Indepenence Box you have to be careful what is actually let out. Wouldnt it be funny if Scotland did gain independance then Shetland demanded to go it alone, taking their oil with them? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 11:03 PM | #92 | |||
|
||||
TIBB's RED DEVIL!!!
|
I can't stand St Cheryl Cole the supposed ''nation's sweetheart''.
I like David Cameron
__________________
Champions 2013! #20 Thanks for everything SAF- Legend! Proud HHH fan- TIME TO PLAY THE GAME! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 11:17 PM | #93 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
i disagree with alot of religion stuff and so my religion teacher hates me
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 11:17 PM | #94 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
04-04-2010, 11:20 PM | #95 | |||
|
||||
User tanned
|
That JedwardFever is a legend and will one day rule the world...starting with TIBB.
Just mark my words.... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-04-2010, 08:59 AM | #96 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
Quote:
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-04-2010, 09:06 AM | #97 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
That some on here need to go out and get some personal experience - walk the walk, instead of talk the talk!
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|