FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Ultimate BB Ultimate Big Brother started 24th August 2010 after the BB11 final and ran for 18 days. It was won by Brian Dowling. All the gossip about the UBB series and housemates here! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
13-09-2010, 04:51 PM | #51 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
I quite liked the montages used for CBB7, BB11 and UBB because it freshenned it up a bit and wasn't so 'Americanised'. It was plain and simple music during tasks that gave it a bit more pace. I'm a bit cautious about the idea of airing eps every other day. In BB3 and 4 it was still on 7 nights a week with Saturday being a live task rather than a highlights show and Sunday's hour long ep covering the highlights from Friday and Saturday - which worked. It wasn't so gimmicky, it was more factual and adult. However, BB8 had NO Saturday shows and also tried to fit the highlights from Friday and Saturday in to an hour long Sunday show which failed miserably because everything was so overexposed. I remember one Sunday show started moments before a HM's eviction (think it was BB8's Nicky) so just think how much footage happened that day that was never broadcast.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 06:48 PM | #52 | |||
|
||||
Lesbian Assassin
|
Quote:
What the British public wants and what the US public wants are 2 completely different things. /unbiased Canadian. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 07:27 PM | #53 | |||
|
||||
Queen Nikki ♥
|
Quote:
__________________
Supporting - Nadia Patsy (The Real Winner) Like - Katie P, Keith, Perez Undecided -Michelle, Jeremy Dislike -Calum, Kavana, Ken, Alexander Loathe -Chloe, Cami, Katie H |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 07:58 PM | #54 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Quote:
I would agree with you if there were any changes to be made to the nomination process, but no, Vote to Evict is not a core element of Big Brother, as it has been changed before on occasion. It really doesn't make the slightest bit of difference, except for the fact we get a better show. Unless of course you would like it to carry on the way it is, the clueless voters will continue to vote out the entertaining housemates, and then the show will be axed for a second time, rendering any possible future for the show completely out of the question? Because no one will commission a show that has been axed twice. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 08:13 PM | #55 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
I don't like the vote to save or the vote to evict by the public, because as I said before people tend to vote out who they "don't like" at the expense of the entertainment of the show. I'd argue for not letting the public vote for anything regarding evictions. The whole premise of the show revolves around a number of housemates being isolated from everything but each other. To me, letting the public decide who stays or who goes betrays that premise by having an outside influence on the house.
You also tend to see people in there being fake and pandering to the public or acting like they don't care about winning in order to endear themselves to the public. If you take out the fear of the public from the game, you'll probably see more people acting truer to who they really are. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 08:15 PM | #56 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
That doesn't happen with Vote to Save though, because we get to vote to keep the entertaining housemates in, and we can outvote the clueless fools who want the entertaining housemates out. Everyone votes for their favourites, and the bores who have no favourites leave. It's perfect.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
13-09-2010, 08:21 PM | #57 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|