FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB13 Big Brother 13 started June 5th 2012 on Channel 5, and was won by Luke A. Discuss here. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-06-2012, 12:33 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
BB should have an all up one off vote to evict.Then go back to the normal vote to save.A lot more people would ring to vote as most don't have a strong favourite yet, yet many have strong dislikes for some housemates.
It'd be democratic, the fight would be up front,honest and courageous and BB would make a lot more money so they don 't really have an excuse other than that they are trying to rig it for the bitches to win, to not do it. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:35 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
IntoxiKated
|
We are promised an hours live feed on Friday 6th July, obviously something major in the pipeline, could be they all have to nom face to face and whoever gets most leaves immediately
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:36 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
No, because it'd mean Lydia would go, and that'd be awful.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:38 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
Avoiding nomination is part of the game, I'm not a fan of when they put everyone up, it just becomes a popularity contest. I just wish they had a minimum of three up for eviction instead of the two, because that's where the vote to save would be beneficial. With just two up it's no different to vote to evict imo.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:41 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
all up would be nice
2 up sucks and i think its going to happen again this week
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:42 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
So BB cancelling the right to discuss when they did gave the bitches an unfair advantage as they'd already formed bonds and decided who to go for. Them all bitching about Lauren last night may be one of there ways of agreeing who to vote for without openly talking about it. At least Caroline who probably was the one starting a lot of the bitching knew it would stay in the heads of the others so they are far more likely to vote again for Lauren anyway. Whover they vote for for this Fridays vote is well before the live feed, and the bitches were given an unfair advantage, so we could lose a good housemate before any of them have a chance of being evicted. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:45 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Jemal
|
I miss vote to evict
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:48 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
I wish they'd have a immunity task every week, so the hm's become really competitive and we see who really has their eyes fixed firmly on the prize.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 12:48 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
No way, we need to keep the entertaining characters in. All up vote to save would be good though, get rid of the deadwood like Sara
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 01:00 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yeah lets destroy the series even further.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 01:04 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
El Cockroach
|
Why? the game is not to get nominated, they should not change the rules because your favourites are in danger.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 01:27 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Ryan.
|
All up vote to save would be good, vote to evict would be a bullet in this series brain.
An idea that could be discussed would be everyone is up for eviction every week ala IACGMOOH, and noms could be positive instead.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 01:30 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
No way vote to save is our last chance to save the big character up!!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-06-2012, 02:03 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Got any chocolate?
|
All up with a vote to evict would be a disaster, it would have to be vote to save!
__________________
Justice For The 97 YNWA Don't buy the sun!! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|