FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
13-01-2014, 08:39 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
Channel 5 really need to make the rules clear of how the nominations system works because they've altered it so ****ing in the past year.
It should just be the 3 (or more if there's a tie for 3rd most noms) with the highest nominations up and a Vote to Save.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:40 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
Evander was also put up with 2 nominations.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:41 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
we
|
Because of BB stupid ****ing rules
|
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:44 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
I think Jasmine, Luisa and Evander all had 2 votes so they all got put up as well as the 2 highest votes, which was Jim and Liz.
This one makes no sense though. Luisa had the FOURTH highest noms yet she was still nominated The only time they would ever need to do that is if it were a double eviction (and even then they only need 3 up). Channel 5 need to stop manipulating and just post an article on their website explaining the rules of the nominations system.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:46 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Because BB is an inconsistent ****!
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:46 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
.
|
Only Jim and Liz should be up as it's meant to be the two with the most noms going head to head? Eurgh so annoying, I think it's there was loads of lose-lose head to heads in BB13 so they've altered it but either way they could have just put p Jasmine as she had 3, there was no need to put Luisa up atall
|
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:47 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
Now you know how we have felt over nominations in our BB for 6 seasons. This kind of thing nomination manipulation has happened there since 2008 to last season.
Maybe one of our producers has been employed by your production team. In which case, i offer my condolences. Last edited by Calderyon; 13-01-2014 at 08:50 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:47 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Because they are a bunch of idiots who believe that somebody with 2 nominations should be up against somebody who had 8
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:48 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
Because production are morons and clearly want their chosen ones safe
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:50 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
who is the chosen one a head to head Liz V Jim would only have one outcome?
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:55 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
It's a double isn't it ....?
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:56 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Like a fine whiskey
|
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 08:57 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 09:15 PM | #14 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Double eviction or they want to get the save money!
|
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 09:19 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2014, 09:28 PM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
I personally don't agree with someone getting 2 noms being up unless somehow the noms divide out that way with no one getting more than that.
However as I understand BB now it seems anyone getting 2 noms is up for the eviction vote regardless of what others get. |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|