FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
13-10-2014, 08:55 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 12:17 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Imogen Thomas teas
__________________
The Thorn Cottage Crew |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 12:18 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Also in general i'm super against them just because it's just a way to give people with money more power, and is usually just an unfair part of the legal system
__________________
The Thorn Cottage Crew |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 11:41 AM | #4 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Bad. No one is above the law. By the same token... reporting of a crime should be in the public interest and not just for salacious gossip.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 04:48 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Z
|
I think super injunctions to protect the rich and famous are a bit unfair; everybody should be afforded that courtesy until the case is closed and if the verdict is guilty or otherwise negates the need for an injunction, the identities should be revealed. I think it's ridiculous how many lives have been ruined by the media declaring people guilty before the courts do.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 04:51 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
iconic
|
Same as the above three replies tbh
__________________
"PLEASE, how do i become a gay icon???" (:
Favourite housemates if a series is excluded, then I haven't watched it or don't currently have a favourite. Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-10-2014, 04:51 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Z
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|