[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by LuciaX

She has a lot more to give to the show I think some of the more dominating characters are overshadowing her at the moment.

Harriet needs to go so I'll be voting for her.

Being overshadowed is a clear sign that a HM is poor. People said Pav last year was overshadowed and would come out of an imaginery, look how that turned out. I am no longer into "bubbling along nicely", the show needs instant gratification. When Nick nominated Chloe, even Harriet was more entertaining. As for Ashleigh she was deliberately biding her time, she even said so.

Chloe is a background character who should not be rewarded. A Chloe eviction would save the show in the future, if it has a future and demonstrate to new auditionees you can no longer spend week 1 and 2 bemusedly grinning at other housemates arguing, causing a bit of drama, safe in the knowledge you will progress to week 3 and beyond

BB on C5 has a major problem with younger female HMs. Being entertaining as a female doesn't mean having to be a contentious harpy like the twins, Harriet or Helen Wood, or showmance fodder but there are no longer witty smart educated females on BB. All the 1 liners, witty comeback lines and interesting commentry comes from the men and this is pi$$ng me off about the females. I would rather see a female Nick or Joel than Chloe. At least aNick and Joel have their momentaof being amusing, all Chloe and the females do is radar dodging/ smoke n bitch or / contrive a showmance (Sarah doing all 3).