[joeysteele]

I liked Chloe a lot of the time, I didn't like the connection to Danny at all and I hated the way she went on about the prize fund too with the cashbomb nonsense.

However, she won it, more votes were given to her than anyone else so no valid argument can be made against that.

[spot_on]

Originally Posted by jennyfromtheblock8

I semi agree. I think Marc was way over rated by a mile and think Chloe was a poor winner.

To my mind Nick or Jack should of won but in the grand scheme of things Nick was the real essence of this years big brother.

I think Marc looked so entertaining because the rest of the housemates were really boring. In some of the more exciting seasons, Marc would have been near the middle of the pack.

[icecakes]

Good little actress, wasn't she, fooled a lot of people

[Northern Monkey]

This series imo was so bad because most of the original hm's were terrible and ALL the finalists were dire.It would'nt have mattered who won it,All awful.When producers have to do a twist a week to keep the show afloat then you know you have **** housemates.

[RodHull]

Originally Posted by y.winter

Marc is so over rated, the two weeks before and after his stay have been much more nice, easy and entertaining to watch

Yeah cause when BB wasnt manufacturing drama by literally paying them to argue we had the highs and lows of watching people poke fun at a fat kid and scream at a moth.

The summer evenings just flew by....

Originally Posted by spot_on

I think Marc looked so entertaining because the rest of the housemates were really boring. In some of the more exciting seasons, Marc would have been near the middle of the pack.

This I would agree with, in some series he'd have been just about ok but in there he was like a shining beacon of charisma among those dullards

[REDCROP]

It gave us about 5 weeks of Marc....it also gave us Jade so for me it was a success....but I agree the final was a disgrace ....BB discrediting the popularity of some of the house mates just 2 days before the final with that awful smear campaign ....yet mindfully not including the eventual winner who actually had a far worse personal history than any of them....BB ran a stitch up and a cover up simultaneously....all round a poor winner and a lousy final

[cookiemonster]

sorry to bump, but i only just found out.

i unintentionally stopped watching after Mark left. i watched mondays episode after he left and then...i just stopped watching. i didn't mean to, it just happened. i had watched every episode up until that point

i have been watching since BB5 and i have NEVER stopped watching at the end of the series. they interfered with it far too much this year and ruined the whole '16 people stuck in a house' dynamic.

my first thought when i saw Chloe has won was 'how disappointing. glad i didn't watch it' worst series ever for me (can't comment on pre BB5 as didn't watch)

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by spot_on

Worse than season 4 and worse than season 11. I will say that as a whole, season 4 was bad throughout. But season 16 had the worst last two weeks in the history of the show. Once Marc walked up those stairs, the entertainment value of the show dropped significantly.

Chloe winning is way worse than Josie winning season 11. At least Josie had some personality.

Edit: Title should say "sealed" not "dealed"

I think you are spot on with this, pardon the pun.

Chloe is the worst ever winner. Josie was awful but at least she didn't have a criminal history.

[mkdfan]

As good as it sounds on paper, I personally think that the "legends" going in ruined the series.
Also Big Brother's constant meddling was annoying, why can't they leave them be?
By constantly reminding them they are on a TV show they will never let their guard down and act like they aren't being watched.
BB is fast becoming reality TV's latest scripted reality show.
I'm glad someone with no connection to celebrities or with an agent won, they are supposed to be civilians.
Chloe winning was the saving grace of the unfortunately poor series.

[reece(:]

Chloe winning redeemed it somewhat.

[Ammi]

..what Reecey said really.../I don't get the 'criminal' thing and her not deserving it, surely if she's had a tough young life, it's nice to think that she's having some good stuff happening as well...don't people need that/don't they deserve it..otherwise let's just pile them up on a heap and let them rot because they've made a few wrong choices in life...

[Ashley.]

Lmao everyone has a personality or else they wouldn't be a person.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by AshRley

Lmao everyone has a personality or else they wouldn't be a person.

Are you including Cristian in that statement

[Calderyon]

It didn´t improve it, that´s for sure.

But before her winning it already was the worst one, so anyone winning wouldn´t have changed that.

No matter how much you put sugar on a pile of ****, it doesn´t get any better.

(For me the sugar was Harry, not Chloe.)

[Ant.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..what Reecey said really.../I don't get the 'criminal' thing and her not deserving it, surely if she's had a tough young life, it's nice to think that she's having some good stuff happening as well...don't people need that/don't they deserve it..otherwise let's just pile them up on a heap and let them rot because they've made a few wrong choices in life...

This
I don't see why people's past is relevant to them being in Big Brother, which is what annoys me when people bring up Helen's past as a prostitute and hold it against her (even though I hate Helen, it shows how desperate people can be to make her look bad) and I don't understand how Chloe's dad or what she did years ago is related to her time in Big Brother

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by hijaxers

Are you including Cristian in that statement

Yes, anyone who is alive has a personality.

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I think you are spot on with this, pardon the pun.

Chloe is the worst ever winner. Josie was awful but at least she didn't have a criminal history.

She kicked a chicken during her VT tbh

[susie q]

Actually I thought that Chloe was quite a good winner, definitely better thanlast years,
Helen was the worst winner ever.

[susie q]

Originally Posted by mkdfan

As good as it sounds on paper, I personally think that the "legends" going in ruined the series.
Also Big Brother's constant meddling was annoying, why can't they leave them be?
By constantly reminding them they are on a TV show they will never let their guard down and act like they aren't being watched.
BB is fast becoming reality TV's latest scripted reality show.
I'm glad someone with no connection to celebrities or with an agent won, they are supposed to be civilians.
Chloe winning was the saving grace of the unfortunately poor series.

well said.

[spot_on]

Originally Posted by AshRley

Yes, anyone who is alive has a personality.

Yes they do, on a scale of 1-10. Chloe and Christian were 1s.

[spot_on]

But hey, if you think someone should be the winner who is hypocritical, has a constant "woe is me" attitude, and likes to walk into a room and butt into or create an argument then immediately run out into another room full of her friends crying saying she was picked on, then yes Chloe is your girl.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..what Reecey said really.../I don't get the 'criminal' thing and her not deserving it, surely if she's had a tough young life, it's nice to think that she's having some good stuff happening as well...don't people need that/don't they deserve it..otherwise let's just pile them up on a heap and let them rot because they've made a few wrong choices in life...

A few wrong choices???

She told the police that an innocent taxi driver had kidnapped her. If convicted he could have gone to prison for 10 years.

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

A few wrong choices???

She told the police that an innocent taxi driver had kidnapped her. If convicted he could have gone to prison for 10 years.

Life is too short for "what if"s.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by AshRley

Life is too short for "what if"s.

It isn't a what if. She committed the crime. She falsely accused him knowing that it could send him to prison. It is an incredibly serious offence.

It beggars belief that she wasn't actually charged with a serious crime. She seems very proud of what she did. Utter scum.

Would you be so casual about it if it was your father/brother/husband/son or whatever that she accused?

She is vile.

[Calderyon]

Better than Helen for sure and about the same level as Sam and Luke A.