[Stormy]

It was ok.

I would have preferred to see a little bit more of the silly times and laughter...but, unlike other series I really didn't have one housemate to champion. I kept switching my favs between James, Austin, Natasha and Bobby. James was an ok winner in the end.

[kirklancaster]

What pisses me off, is the inescapable conclusion, that the show is severely edited by biased dickheads who do not screen what are probably the most genuinely entertaining moments.

I'm talking about how every time we get someone with actual comedic talents - such as Bobby Davro, a very gifted and funny impressionist - we see very little of them performing. Yet, during post-show interviews these comics or other HM's let slip in passing how much clowning or performing they did.

Of course, it would be detrimental to the producers plans if their pre-selected winner was upstaged by someone such as Davro if he WAS given screen time and endeared himself to the voting public, far better to concentrate on no-talents and bore us all to death with the predictable outcome.

There are 'celebrities', then there are those who the producers will make 'celebrities' by design.

James may have been on the Apprentice but 'celebrity'? Don't make me larf.

And the psycho-super bully non-entity runner up? Oooh Matron.

[Mystic Mock]

Liked it but some of the evictions could've been better, and of course the end outcome could've been better or at least unpredictable.

But overall it was a lot better than BB16, and arguably CBB15.