[Marc]

Can we please keep any spoilers out of the thread titles; this is especially in the case of British viewers so can't watch it live. I've already had the HoH spoiled by somebody on here and I've yet to even watch the eviction episode.

Please try to be decent enough as to not spoil it for people, it's not fair.

[Bluerang1]

I haven't seen a any spoiler titles, except if you hover over thread titles. Sorry about someone ruining it for you!

And I'm still holding out on that Jodi tag...

[Munchkins]

I'm sorry, since im guessing it was my thread
I won't do it again in the future.

[Marc]

Yeah it was yours but no worries, just don't do it again LOL

[LemonJam]

Can I just ask how long until something's not considered a "spoiler"?

[Marc]

How do you mean?

[starry]

LemonJam probably meant after the showing of the HLs show. But spoilers I think generally relate to those who get info off the HGs on the live feed.

[kingston]

This is nearly impossible to police... One should assume that a forum would contain spoilers and if you don't want to be spoiled then you should stay off the internet completely...

[starry]

Not really. You can always have a spoiler section I suppose for those that want to be always ahead of the HLs, but otherwise spoiler tags aren't that hard to use. If something hasn't been shown on the HLs use spoiler tags. And really this is about HoH and Veto, pretty specific things for people to be careful over.

[Joe.]

Already know who's nommed urgh.

[Braden]

anything for you Marc!

and where can you see whose nominated?

[starry]

You just get spoiled with thread titles all over the internet. The problem is the **** producers, the American audience seems to love being treated like ****. The juror return should have happened last Thursday on the HLs. The HLs audience, which is the vast majority of the audience are treated like dirt. Even the much smaller live feed audience are made fools of as they aren't shown most of the competitions.

[Pete.]

@SuperV