About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Jordan. · 07-08-2011, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

That's my point. The bump still generated interest - certainly one of them did - yet that seems okay - but not the others (which would have died away given the lack of interest anyway). Don't you see what I mean?

anyway: I still don't feel it's clear. Some are allowed to do it, even though it's pointless comments, and some aren't - that's all I'm saying. It's hard to know where members stand sometimes when there is disparity.

So do threads from 2002 but that doesn't mean we should all go bump them.

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Hmmm...so what on earth was the reason for bumping my thread from april?

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...162571&page=48 look at this thread

well the point was that thread was from this year i think but the thread in this post is very old

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan.

So do threads from 2002 but that doesn't mean we should all go bump them.

Jordan who are you to say what can be posted where go back to your 30 cher threads

Pyramid* · 07-08-2011, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I feel you are deliberately missing my point.

'Some are allowed to do it'...when there is actually a point in the bumping.

'Some arent'' when there is no point at all in bumping them.

I can assure you, I am not deliberately missing any point.

How can a pointless thread, as you have said yourself you feel a thread is: be allowed to be bumped - given that there that thread has been deemed pointless.

I find the rule is unclear and I'm still no further informed than I was way back from post one.

On a side note to Michael: the one thing I will say is: if you are bumping threads then deleting your posts - it's neither big nor clever. It's actually a very good way to antagonise and annoy people.

Boothy · 07-08-2011, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...162571&page=48 look at this thread

well the point was that thread was from this year i think but the thread in this post is very old

There's 48 pages of discussion in that thread, it's being used on a near daily basis. The thread you just bumped hadn't been posted in since April.

I'm not quite sure you understand the term 'bumping'

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 04:41 PM

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...16&postcount=1

jordan saying about bumping when he bump this old thread and changes the
Title

Jordan. · 07-08-2011, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

Jordan who are you to say what can be posted where go back to your 30 cher threads

Because thats an appreciation thread twat

Jordan. · 07-08-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...16&postcount=1

jordan saying about bumping when he bump this old thread and changes the
Title

Thats not even my thread. **** off.

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boothy

There's 48 pages of discussion in that thread, it's being used on a near daily basis. The thread you just bumped hadn't been posted in since April.

I'm not quite sure you understand the term 'bumping'

but look at post one it was a old thread that got no replys so he changes the
Title that a bump right

Pyramid* · 07-08-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

That's my point. The bump still generated interest - certainly one of them did - yet that seems okay - but not the others (which would have died away given the lack of interest anyway). Don't you see what I mean?

anyway: I still don't feel it's clear. Some are allowed to do it, even though it's pointless comments, and some aren't - that's all I'm saying. It's hard to know where members stand sometimes when there is disparity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan.

So do threads from 2002 but that doesn't mean we should all go bump them.

Full circle again and emphasising my point. If they still do generate interest again: where is the line drawn then?

Boothy · 07-08-2011, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...16&postcount=1

jordan saying about bumping when he bump this old thread and changes the
Title

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boothy

I'm not quite sure you understand the term 'bumping'

Point proven

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

but look at post one it was a old thread that got no replys so he changes the
Title that a bump right

What are you even talking about?

MTVN · 07-08-2011, 04:49 PM

This truly is an awful thread, Michael still cant seem to understand the concept of bumping a thread never mind the rules around it.

But seriously cant people just use their common sense with things like these, it's not hard to work out whether or not it's going to be appropiate to bump a thread

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

This truly is an awful thread, Michael still cant seem to understand the concept of bumping a thread never mind the rules around it.

But seriously cant people just use their common sense with things like these, it's not hard to work out whether or not it's going to be appropiate to bump a thread

so you saying its ok to bump some threads

Josy · 07-08-2011, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

so you saying its ok to bump some threads

Its fine to bump a thread if there is a good reason for doing so.

Its NOT fine to bump threads for no good reason and then delete the bumping posts afterwards.

Glenn. · 07-08-2011, 05:04 PM

This rebellion against TiBB is really starting getting to me.

Member always whinging about something.

Zippy · 07-08-2011, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

so you saying its ok to bump some threads

Its all about intent, not the actual bump

only post on an old thread if you have something useful to add. And DO NOT then delete your post. Really not hard to follow.

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josy

Its fine to bump a thread if there is a good reason for doing so.

Its NOT fine to bump threads for no good reason and then delete the bumping posts afterwards.

is there a time line to reply to threads

Vicky. · 07-08-2011, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael21

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...162571&page=48 look at this thread

well the point was that thread was from this year i think but the thread in this post is very old

But the cher appreciation thread isnt being bumped for no reason though, People are still discussing her.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I can assure you, I am not deliberately missing any point.

How can a pointless thread, as you have said yourself you feel a thread is: be allowed to be bumped - given that there that thread has been deemed pointless.

I find the rule is unclear and I'm still no further informed than I was way back from post one.

On a side note to Michael: the one thing I will say is: if you are bumping threads then deleting your posts - it's neither big nor clever. It's actually a very good way to antagonise and annoy people.

Because to ME the thread is pointless(assuming you are talking about aristas thread?). However other people may have interest in emma. he is bumping to let people know that shes on tv at that time. Very different to bumping a 1/2year old thread with just a smiley.

Boothy · 07-08-2011, 05:08 PM

Michael, serious question.

Do you know what bumping is?

michael21 · 07-08-2011, 05:09 PM

right lets scrap the bump rule as no one no what it mean going by the reply in this thread

Niamh. · 07-08-2011, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

This truly is an awful thread, Michael still cant seem to understand the concept of bumping a thread never mind the rules around it.

But seriously cant people just use their common sense with things like these, it's not hard to work out whether or not it's going to be appropiate to bump a thread

The voice of reason.