[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by smudgie

True...hopefully he won't get the chance to get anywhere near him

Boom !!

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Well I wont be going on about the state he dresses or faces he pulls Joey,I will listen to him as THAT is what is important don't you think?

Here, here.

Politics is supposedly for adults, if people can't raise about that type of behaviour they have no right being there.

[smudgie]

Even John McDonnell said it was gifts on the tree for everyone.

[arista]

JC got more cheers, that the PM
at the starts

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Poverty, the word used for low income.
No absolute poverty nowadays.

He and no one else has said there is absolute poverty.
However there is poverty, are you saying the 5th richest Nation should consider it acceptable to have any kind of poverty.
I certainly don't think that acceptable.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by arista

JC got more cheers, that the PM
at the starts

For the many not the few!

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

He and no one else has said there is absolute poverty.
However there is poverty, are you saying the 5th richest Nation should consider it acceptable to have any kind of poverty.
I certainly don't think that acceptable.

People assume that poverty means poverty.
It is based on different standards to real poverty.
Why don't they just call it what it is, say more people are on low incomes rather than in poverty.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by arista

JC got more cheers, that the PM
at the starts

Do you know how many didn't cheer? It may well be the majority didn't - loud does not represent truth - just an illusion of it.

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Do you know how many didn't cheer? It may well be the majority didn't - loud does not represent truth - just an illusion of it.

True, the same as the aggressive way some questions are asked.

[reece(:]

King of peace

[Kazanne]

look at him stumbling now,sorry he comes over as dodgy to me very insincere as fake as Katie prices tits

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by smudgie

People assume that poverty means poverty.
It is based on different standards to real poverty.
Why don't they just call it what it is, say more people are on low incomes rather than in poverty.

That doesn't make sense.
You listed absolute poverty in your post,I stated poverty.

For instance this govt considers people in energy poverty if a certain percentage of their disposable income goes on it.

Low incomes help create poverty actually.

[smudgie]

Oh dear.
Not going down too well.

[Kazanne]

Can you imagine if TM had refused to answer that question,LOL she'de have been crucified,he just wouldn't answer,why not?

[reece(:]

Tory grandpa needs to calm down

[joeysteele]

What a Nation of warmongers the UK is being taken on the road to being.
Nuclear weapons used will wipe all out.
As a song says,there'll be no one to save with the World in a grave.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Tory grandpa needs to calm down

Why ? did he ask a question that had Corbyn on the ropes?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Can you imagine if TM had refused to answer that question,LOL she'de have been crucified,he just wouldn't answer,why not?

This lot would be tearing her to shreds. But if it's Corbyn out come the defensive excuses.

This country will not be safe in his hands.

[smudgie]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

That doesn't make sense.
You listed absolute poverty in your post,I stated poverty.

For instance this govt considers people in energy poverty if a certain percentage of their disposable income goes on it.

Low incomes help create poverty actually.

Well it makes sense to me.
I stated both absolute poverty and poverty.
One doesn't exist and the other is now a word that covers ' low income'.
The more wages go up, the more people will go into 'poverty'.
Not because they are any worse off, but because some people will be better off.
All to do with percentages and median wage.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Can you imagine if TM had refused to answer that question,LOL she'de have been crucified,he just wouldn't answer,why not?

He answered it before.
I think his hate for and position as to nuclear weapons has been known for decades.
He hasn't changed his position ever.

[Scarlett.]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

This lot would be tearing her to shreds. But if it's Corbyn out come the defensive excuses.

This country will not be safe in his hands.

As a Corbyn supporter, I acknowledge that he handled that question terribly, however we're not electing him as a leader in a nuclear war, so it's not really an issue at the forefront.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

What a Nation of warmongers the UK is being taken on the road to being.
Nuclear weapons used will wipe all out.
As a song says,there'll be no one to save with the World in a grave.

DETERENT - do people Not understand what that means. Without it we are screwed.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

He answered it before.
I think his hate for and position as to nuclear weapons has been known for decades.
He hasn't changed his position ever.

He doesn't backtrack and change his mind every few months

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

DETERENT - do people Not understand what that means. Without it we are screwed.

It's staying

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Well it makes sense to me.
I stated both absolute poverty and poverty.
One doesn't exist and the other is now a word that covers ' low income'.
The more wages go up, the more people will go into 'poverty'.
Not because they are any worse off, but because some people will be better off.
All to do with percentages and median wage.

No.
I say again,low incomes can lead to poverty.
Address low incomes then poverty will decrease.
Two different things.