[arista]

"Did you know that Nazi's also had..."


Yes Slim
I have Studied the Downfall of Hitler
has no connection with this new UK plan.

[arista]

"As for Charles, well no problem with him having an opinion"



No MTVN
he is out of order
saying such mutterings

[arista]

For The Last Time Slim


"They aren't illegal migrants"


They are illegal at the point they travel
they use Criminal Gangs
to cross the sea from Safe France.

[LeatherTrumpet]

tbh noone cares what Charles says

and genuinely mean noone

i think when people are using the Nazis to discredit it we can say this is a good idea

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

tbh noone cares what Charles says

and genuinely mean noone

i think when people are using the Nazis to discredit it we can say this is a good idea

Bit in bold makes absolutely no sense whatsoever

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

"Did you know that Nazi's also had..."


Yes Slim
I have Studied the Downfall of Hitler
has no connection with this new UK plan.

So you ignore the facts about punishing victims, international law, asylum claim validity etc? I'm shocked, I tells ya.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

If you really believe that, and I doubt you do beyond using it as an excuse, then you do realise that we're sending the victims of those gangs to rwanda and not the criminal gangs themselves? Do you think these gangs you pretend to be so scared of, will stop transporting people here? Did you know that Nazi's also had a plan to relocate all their jews to a different country at one stage?

Leaving France is irrelevant, and it's perfectly legal to leave a safe country to claim asylum in a different country altogether. They aren't illegal migrants, as the evidence shows that the overwhelming majority of them have valid claims to asylum.

If they're legal then why are they sneaking in on dinghies? Why don't they just enter through the proper channels?

Seems a bit odd to sneak in risking their lives on dinghies when they can catch the train.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

So you ignore the facts about punishing victims, international law, asylum claim validity etc? I'm shocked, I tells ya.

Proper Asylum
are not going to Africa.


These are the ones that can not justify
staying in the UK

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

If they're legal then why are they sneaking in on dinghies? Why don't the just enter through the proper channels?

Seems a bit odd to sneak in risking their lives on dinghies when they can catch the train.

Because people don't legally need to do what you think they should. It also takes years in a hostile environment, when the lives of their families and themselves is probably a little ore important to them than wait and see. Look at all the promises this government made to the Afghanis versus the reality, to understand that a bit more.

They are completely legal. I know that probably seems as though it can't be true, when we're spoon fed the nonsense that they're illegal every day, but it's true.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Proper Asylum
are not going to Africa.


These are the ones that can not justify
staying in the UK

They're using Rwanda for processing, meaning that is prior to their claims being established.

If they had their claims turned down, then us trafficking them to Rwanda against their will makes us worse than the criminal gangs.

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Bit in bold makes absolutely no sense whatsoever

no, not to you it does not

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

no, not to you it does not

Fcuking hell dude, you used to be so much better at trolling, now you're reduced to pretending your incoherence is a feature and not a bug. Enjoy your evening, LT

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Fcuking hell dude, you used to be so much better at trolling, now you're reduced to pretending your incoherence is a feature and not a bug. Enjoy your evening, LT

oh dear

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

They're using Rwanda for processing, meaning that is prior to their claims being established.

If they had their claims turned down, then us trafficking them to Rwanda against their will makes us worse than the criminal gangs.

Not All
of them Slim.

[Oliver_W]

I thought there were plenty of Hotels in Rwanda especially for migrants

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

Brandon Lewis MP
Live on Ridge
SkyNewsHD


Confirmed he is happy the first flight will take
the Illegal Migrants
to Rwanda on Tuesday.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Bit in bold makes absolutely no sense whatsoever

Even I can undetstand that it means there is absolutely nothing for people to moan about with this plan, so much so the only thing left for them is to wheel out the nazis to try and make a point.


Also, you call LT the troll, yet even I can see that it's you that's trolling in this thread...NOT LT.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

So you ignore the facts about punishing victims, international law, asylum claim validity etc? I'm shocked, I tells ya.

Why do you see it as a punishment?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Even I can undetstand that it means there is absolutely nothing for people to moan about with this plan, so much so the only thing left for them is to wheel out the nazis to try and make a point.


Also, you call LT the troll, yet even I can see that it's you that's trolling in this thread...NOT LT.

Apart from all the direct points I made?

The fact you have already asked a question abut one of the points I made regarding punishment shows you've already contradicted both you and LT, and it doesn't excuse the fact LT had no point beyond the use of a logical fallacy, but the way you guys rally round each other to defend mind numbing stupidity is really sweet

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Apart from all the direct points I made?

The fact you have already asked a question abut one of the points I made regarding punishment shows you've already contradicted both you and LT, and it doesn't excuse the fact LT had no point beyond the use of a logical fallacy, but the way you guys rally round each other to defend mind numbing stupidity is really sweet

Surprised you didnt mention ze germans again to make you think your point has any validity.

[LeatherTrumpet]

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Surprised you didnt mention ze germans again to make you think your point has any validity.

Bless.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by arista

As far as I know there's no real reason the date of the departures needs to be made public, they shouldn't release that kind of detail incase protestors decide to lie across the tarmac or whatever, unless police are at hand to remove them.
Better to just do it a day early instead.

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Well exactly. The crossings of the Channel (and the Med) need to be halted, and should have been long ago.