About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Tom · 11-08-2009, 03:57 PM

Everyone suddenly wants nominations fiddled with and suddenly its fixed. Ask yourself, if it was Charlie v Lisa, would you care?

Cybele · 11-08-2009, 03:59 PM

Actually, you are wrong at least in my case. I wouldn't care who was up. IN FACT, if you looked at yesterday's threads, I said from the very moment that BB let them discuss nominations that I felt that there would be a twist and noms wouldn't count. It wouldn't matter who was being reported as being up. I would still advise to wait because this isn't a normal week.

So while some people here are definitely hypocritical. Not all are.

Vladimir · 11-08-2009, 03:59 PM

LOL

I'm so happy...

28thapril · 11-08-2009, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom
Everyone suddenly wants nominations fiddled with and suddenly its fixed. Ask yourself, if it was Charlie v Lisa, would you care?

I have my favourites but don't really care who goes as long as it's the public who decide

Adamw92 · 11-08-2009, 04:00 PM

Hmm well people don't care when it's ones up that they don't like but when they're favourite is up then everything needs to be fixed, you can' always get what you want

seansmc · 11-08-2009, 04:01 PM

The people who like Charlie and Lisa would care but as they have less of a following compared to Marcus and Freddie, less people would complain so it wouldn't be noticed as much.

Brad. · 11-08-2009, 04:01 PM

i am outraged yes but freddie will go

Enid · 11-08-2009, 04:01 PM

I don't even know who is up...

Claymores · 11-08-2009, 04:12 PM

It is as funny as last days - Charlie has been public enemy no1 cos dared to slag off Halfarse

Josy · 11-08-2009, 04:18 PM

i would say nominations have already been fiddled with this week, letting them discuss it made it far too easy for them to target Marcus and Freddie

Beastie · 11-08-2009, 04:19 PM

and sophie didnt even get punished!!!! the people working for big brother are biased!!

well i bet sharon powers is biased!

Shasown · 11-08-2009, 04:30 PM

The favourites of the more vocal members of this forum going up will create a few extra posts claiming all sorts of stuff.

The official announcements havent been made yet, so the hotheaded posting of all the claims of fixes etc are a bit premature, maybe its just them practising for when the real announcements are made.

An important point to remember is endemol produce a tv program about a house of people, its not just the Freddie and Marcus show regardless what some forum members would like us to believe.

The show itself is a game, if the person wants to stay in the house there are rules to follow. The rules can be changed at any time by the company not by the housemate. And if the company want to change the rules they dont have to consult.

While a certain entertainment value may be obtained from some housemates, the airtime taken to follow their obviously reduces airtime given over to other housemates storylines. If a group of housemates are acting up, the other housemates will watch or take part, this could be taken for them being boring however thats not necessarily true.

Shasown · 11-08-2009, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by josycee
i would say nominations have already been fiddled with this week, letting them discuss it made it far too easy for them to target Marcus and Freddie

Marcus wanted to be up, he was asking people to put him up and dropping not so subtle hints leading up to the time of the rule change. So its hardly targeting him, giving him what he asked for is it?

Tom · 11-08-2009, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bbfanatic
and sophie didnt even get punished!!!! the people working for big brother are biased!!

well i bet sharon powers is biased!

If you watch the show you'd know that removal of food was punishment for every rule broken. There will have been others we hadn't seen too

Striptease · 11-08-2009, 04:34 PM

It's fixed cos Bea and Sophie discussed noms before the rules were changed.

kellybsblover · 11-08-2009, 04:35 PM

Exactly. I dont think I've ever disliked contestants more then I do those three so I'm having a party here.

BB_Eye · 11-08-2009, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bbfanatic
and sophie didnt even get punished!!!! the people working for big brother are biased!!

well i bet sharon powers is biased!

Not biased... just incompetent

kellybsblover · 11-08-2009, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Striptease
It's fixed cos Bea and Sophie discussed noms before the rules were changed.

marcus has been breaing house rules for the past few weeks.... I dont think you have room to talk.

officialleafan · 11-08-2009, 04:46 PM

Tom you're so right! It's hilarious! Suddenly it's a big conspiracy cause they're both up.

MissKittyFantastico · 11-08-2009, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom

Quote:

Originally posted by bbfanatic
and sophie didnt even get punished!!!! the people working for big brother are biased!!

well i bet sharon powers is biased!

If you watch the show you'd know that removal of food was punishment for every rule broken. There will have been others we hadn't seen too

Actually the food being removed was punishment for The Three Musketeers breaking out of jail and refusing to go back.

The freedom to discuss noms was the 'punishment' for Sophie, David and Bea's talking about noms.

Some punishment.