[smudgie]

What right has he to put people on the spot like that. Talking about whoever wins sharing the prize money with Steve. Now if anybody declines they may perceive that the public think they are nasty and will vote against them. BB is a game show where the public will decide the winner and if Steve should win then good on him, but if not then he should not be given part of the winners pot.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by smudgie

What right has he to put people on the spot like that. Talking about whoever wins sharing the prize money with Steve. Now if anybody declines they may perceive that the public think they are nasty and will vote against them. BB is a game show where the public will decide the winner and if Steve should win then good on him, but if not then he should not be given part of the winners pot.

He actually said that???

What an attention seeking Tosspot he is!

[fingers]

In any case Endemol could easily buy him the latest prosthetic limbs that he needs!

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

When did he say that, how dare he put people in that position

[Niall]

I never liked Dave, he always creeped me out. If this is true, then I can add it to my long, long list of reasons why I don't like him.

[Claymores]

It used to be an enforced BB rule in early series that talking about what you'd do with the money was a fundamental rule break punishable by formal warning (ultimately ejection if carried -on)

They brought this rule to the fore a bit after BB1 Winner Craig had often mentioned he'd give the money to his Downs Syndrome relative and people raised the issue that this could be construed as a tactic to win votes in the final.

That rule got forgotten along the way.

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Originally Posted by Me!

I never liked Dave, he always creeped me out. If this is true, then I can add it to my long, long list of reasons why I don't like him.

Me too, i've not liked him since day 1.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Claymores

It used to be an enforced BB rule in early series that talking about what you'd do with the money was a fundamental rule break punishable by formal warning (ultimately ejection if carried -on)

They brought this rule to the fore a bit after BB1 Winner Craig had often mentioned he'd give the money to his Downs Syndrome relative and people raised the issue that this could be construed as a tactic to win votes in the final.

That rule got forgotten along the way.

To curry favour with the viewing public is the ONLY reason he would have said that!

[Niall]

Originally Posted by BigBrotherfan4ever

Me too, i've not liked him since day 1.

Neither have I. That laughing he did on the way into the house was very strange.

[Claymores]

Dave saying that he's lay his hands-on Steve and ask the Lord to grow him new legs, is the other Dave bit I find unforgivable.

That was objectionable to me, even if Steve felt able to let it go. This new one seems also to treat Steve as purely a figure of sympathy than a real person

Tactless R Us

[paper-cut-exit]

Dave's a clown... and he has no tact. Just the sorta thing i'd expect from the slavering buffoon tbh.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Claymores

Dave saying that he's lay his hands-on Steve and ask the Lord to grow him new legs, is the other Dave bit I find unforgivable.

That was objectionable to me, even if Steve felt able to let it go. This new one seems also to treat Steve as purely a figure of sympathy than a real person

Tactless R Us

If he actually believed what he said, he's a raving *****ing lunatic and ought to be sectioned for the public good.

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Originally Posted by Claymores

Dave saying that he's lay his hands-on Steve and ask the Lord to grow him new legs, is the other Dave bit I find unforgivable.

That was objectionable to me, even if Steve felt able to let it go. This new one seems also to treat Steve as purely a figure of sympathy than a real person

Tactless R Us

I know when said that to steve, i felt totally discusted, how patronise can one person be

[Peter Plunker]

So if someone has a good motive they are automatically trying to curry favour with the viewing public?

Paranoid much?

[Peter Plunker]

Originally Posted by BigBrotherfan4ever

I know when said that to steve, i felt totally discusted, how patronise can one person be

You are far more patronising by implying that Steve cannot think for himself.

PS, learn to write in English please.

[Zippy]

Im sure Steve gets his legs paid for anyway. He's probably got a vast collection for all occasions.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Peter Plunker

So if someone has a good motive they are automatically trying to curry favour with the viewing public?

Paranoid much?

You still that moron's big mate are you?:wavey

In real life I mean!!:

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Zippy

Im sure Steve gets his legs paid for anyway. He's probably got a vast collection for all occasions.

Of course he does, the cheapest the NHS can find!

[Claymores]

Originally Posted by Peter Plunker

So if someone has a good motive they are automatically trying to curry favour with the viewing public?

Paranoid much?

1. Fundamental rule-break........just not being enforced lately.

2. Extremely patronising - why not boost Steve's confidence by telling him he's win the show on merit by being a nice guy? Treating him as someone to be pitied and thefefore should be the subject of their charity is just wrong.

Yer pal had turned me round a bit, especially by digging the house out of Ben's hole yesterday, but his faux pas always drag me back to where I was.

[Marzy]

I cannot abide people who try and guilt trip you into something you have different views on. Dave is an arsehole!!

[Braden]

What an arse-hole

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Me!

I never liked Dave, he always creeped me out. If this is true, then I can add it to my long, long list of reasons why I don't like him.

I dont like him also and like you if he sunk so low as to say this I will add it to my long list of why I dont like the STUPID Bible basher

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Extremely patronising - why not boost Steve's confidence by telling him he's win the show on merit by being a nice guy? Treating him as someone to be pitied and thefefore should be the subject of their charity is just wrong.


Totally agree with you, from experience as i am in wheelchair, i just cant stand people pitting me, & feeling sorry for me.

[InOne]

They all went in equal, no matter what their past stories are.

[bbfan1991]

I agree that the winner shouldn't have to donate money to help Steve get new things for his legs with their earnings, it's their cash however if they choose to do it then I would say fair play.

I respect Steve in the fact that he has his disability but hates to be patronised and will ask for help when he needs it whilst also not needing pity!.