FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
14-02-2011, 08:14 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Honourary Super Moderator
|
Quote:
Why blame Phill? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
14-02-2011, 11:30 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
MVGGA
|
i agree op about why blame phil.
it was a fix that kerry stayed as jason and emma liked comedy dave and all the judges scored him higher most weeks.
__________________
I'm a sick bitch. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-02-2011, 10:08 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Keyser Suze
|
I think people just vent at those who are easily in the firing line and available to vent at, and it happened to be Phil. I am sure it will all calm down soon. They have to remember that for all their outrage, it is only a show and the Celebs do well out of it in terms of media exposure and pay for appearing no matter what order they get voted off. So at the end of the day most of the Celebs will just be happy enough to have appeared on the show, get to do the tour, have fun, get media exposure and build up a fanbase. So it's all good for them
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams. "Live for today because yesterday is gone and tomorrow may never come" - Author unknown |
|||
Reply With Quote |
15-02-2011, 10:24 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Pyramid*
|
The main problem is that too many people take these shows WAAAAYYYYYYYY too seriously - they are light entertainment shows, with built in and pre-determined agendas, with them wanting to get their monies worth from those they paid the highest fees to.
I'm not aware of who has been paid what, but I don't think it's out of the realms of strong possibilty that those who have already been voted off: will have been on lesser payments - or - they know a certain person remaining in situ will create more contraversy, and subsequently, pump up the viewing figures. If that didn't figure somewhere along the lines, why on earth would final decisions, final votes be taken out of the public's hands - and put right back into the hands of the judges. X-Factor anyone......??? !!!! How many times did the usual pattern of the public getting the vote change, to putting it back into the judges hands. Big Brother is the same -hence all the changes to rules, formats, voting etc. People need to realise these shows are highly manipulated - the public only get so much of a say in it, and ONLY when the producers decide. |
||
Reply With Quote |
15-02-2011, 06:20 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
oh well at the end of the day thats the point of the judging panel, i wouldnt have got rid of jennifer over vanilla ice but they did and they always scored her higher aswell. Just part of the show.
Besides he only had 0.5 more than Kerry it wasnt as if it was a hands down conclusion who would stay and who would go. I could understand if the bottom two had been Kerry and Laura and theyd got rid of Laura but Dave wasnt really all that either |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|