[Angus]

I know Michael didn't win but I'm delighted he made the final. He was a slow burner and it took some people a while to warm to him. This would never have happened with vote to evict, he would have been out first time he was up and CBB would have been over for me a fortnight ago.

Whatever my personal opinion of Denise, you can't deny that she got the most votes and won, surely the most democratic way of deciding any competition?

[chuff me dizzy]

I hate vote to save, even though this year it didnt mater as the best people were in final 3 ,but I prefer vote to evict, it doesnt cost me as much money !!

[Black Dagger]

Yes could you imagine what a vote to evict would have done this year, we'd have had a final 4 consisting of Georgia, Natasha, Natalie and Gareth likely...

I'd rather V.T.S even when it doesn't produce the right winner. V.T.E while more satisfying gets rid of the main players straight away.

[Josy]

I agree vote to save must stay, its the only way to keep decent housemates in, I see tons of people on facebook saying they want vote to evict back though.

[True Whorror]

I wish they'd do votes to save and evict over a series - shake it up a bit.

[Visage]

Yes, vote to save is the way forward.

[starry]

Vote to save doesn't work with only 2 up, the HMs are also portrayed very negatively still by presenters and the stupid crowd they still use to affect the house and rest of the audience.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by True Whorror

I wish they'd do votes to save and evict over a series - shake it up a bit.

That would just confuse the public and maybe turn some away from voting altogether.

[Scotty07]

Vote to save is the greatest change to BB ever made and must stay, because it means haters of interesting housemates can't always have everything their own way.

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Josy

I agree vote to save must stay, its the only way to keep decent housemates in, I see tons of people on facebook saying they want vote to evict back though.

Only because it evicted the 'lovely' Natalie and they want V.T.E to get rid of the big characters, the GBP can't be trusted with a V.T.E

[Suze]

Originally Posted by Angus

I know Michael didn't win but I'm delighted he made the final. He was a slow burner and it took some people a while to warm to him. This would never have happened with vote to evict, he would have been out first time he was up and CBB would have been over for me a fortnight ago.

Whatever my personal opinion of Denise, you can't deny that she got the most votes and won, surely the most democratic way of deciding any competition?

Must agree, I prefer the vote to save.

Michael did well to make the final, considering many who wanted to vote for him or the Twin's couldn't do so because of where they lived. So a very good result for him considering

[Suze]

Originally Posted by starry

Vote to save doesn't work with only 2 up, the HMs are also portrayed very negatively still by presenters and the stupid crowd they still use to affect the house and rest of the audience.

It doesn't matter either way with just two up though, so they may as well keep vote to save all the way through, plus it saves confusion for voters. I think a good rule would be for BB to make sure there are always more than two up in evictions to stop the chance of betting scams.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

I hate vote to save, even though this year it didnt mater as the best people were in final 3 ,but I prefer vote to evict, it doesnt cost me as much money !!

I believe this is the whole point, which is why vote to save isn't going anywhere.

[emmetmcl]

Keep vote to save, but they have to put 3 people up each week.

[Jack_]

Anybody wanting vote to evict back is one of the morons who for years ruined Big Brother with their quite frankly idiotic voting patterns. As someone has already said, the voting public cannot be trusted with that method, they're too stupid and always end up voting the most entertaining housemate out, it makes no sense.

[Scotty07]

I forgot to add and others have already said it before too, but I would love the nominations to change to three or more housemates up for eviction.

[Angus]

Better still, why not just put everyone up every week so the public get a real shot at saving the ones they want. That way we might see more interesting game play as every HM would need to get the public on side and not have the bores sail under the radar being protected by whichever clique they've formed an alliance with. BB could also devise tasks that give all HMs a chance to gain immunity for that week's eviction.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by Angus

Better still, why not just put everyone up every week so the public get a real shot at saving the ones they want. That way we might see more interesting game play as every HM would need to get the public on side and not have the bores sail under the radar being protected by whichever clique they've formed an alliance with. BB could also devise tasks that give all HMs a chance to gain immunity for that week's eviction.

I like this idea, but it would take away the nomination process, which is something I love about the show.

I do think it's something they should consider for maybe a week or two. Perhaps one in the first half of the series and one in the second half.

[joeysteele]

I hope vote to save stays, it is the better way and most people have wanted it for ages now in BB series.

I would though like to also see all housemates up 2 or 3 times in a series for eviction, especially in the main BB series.

[Diatom]

Yes, keep it coming! keep giving us your hard earned money. Thank You.
It's a business YO! You all must work for BB...

[Colbert-Bump]

Vote To Save means we have big characters in the final, let's hope it stays that way.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by emmetmcl

Keep vote to save, but they have to put 3 people up each week.

This.

Anton would have gone when Aden did last year if we had a "vote to evict", so I will always love the "vote to save" for that alone. He was a, in my opinion, terrible housemate.

[karl100589]

Originally Posted by JellyFantastic

This.

Anton would have gone when Aden did last year if we had a "vote to evict", so I will always love the "vote to save" for that alone. He was a, in my opinion, terrible housemate.

Carrying this on out of curiousity:
Wk 6: Aden Vs Harry Vs Jay Vs Jem
Jay goes

Jem still quits.

Wk 7: Aaron vs Aden vs Faye vs Harry
Aaron goes

Wk 8: Faye vs Louise
Faye goes

Final: Aden vs Alex vs Harry vs Louise vs Tom #shudders#
5th- Tom
4th- Louise
3rd- Aden
2nd- Harry
1st- Alex

NEVER Criticise VTS again when with VTE we would have ended up with this.