About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Harry! · 14-09-2012, 06:35 PM

The difference between Prince Harry and Kate is that Harry allowed people into his apartment and therefore somewhat gave them permission to take photos of him. Kate on the other hand is enjoying herself on a holiday and she should be allowed to take her clothes off without the fear of being taking pictures of. What has happened to Kate today is unacceptable. Especially as the same day Kate was photographed dressed modestly in her visit to Malaysia.

arista · 14-09-2012, 06:46 PM

"What has happened to Kate today is unacceptable."

Sure
But France is not under UK Rule.

That mag online has had more hits today that ever,
they can get a Fine - thats what they do in France
but the Photo - not that clear is out there.

The worst thing today Harry
is people saying they will never buy Closer UK mag again,
but they seem not aware that the French Closer mag (Italian owned)
is nothing to do with the English Closer mag version (German owned).

Legend killer · 14-09-2012, 06:59 PM

She might aswell make a sextape now/10

thesheriff443 · 14-09-2012, 07:01 PM

just beacuse its kate's tits it dont make any one a pervert for wanting to see them!!!
we all watch big brother for the same reason wanting to watch someone warts and all!

arista · 14-09-2012, 07:16 PM

Yes Royal Tits

Shame the Photo is not Clear.

Omah · 14-09-2012, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19604535

* The local village, Gignac has a population of only 69, so the "photographer" has stalked the Royal couple into the back of beyond, where I don't think there will be any "streets" .....

The French mag editor is now claiming that the couple's balcony, the responsibility of Royal security, was visible from a local motorway, so security's omission to screen the balcony made the Duchess fair game .....

arista · 14-09-2012, 07:40 PM

Yes maybe its fine will be less.

Most French mags pay the Fine
and still make more money.

emmetmcl · 14-09-2012, 11:13 PM

In my opinion, I think the Royal family have a cheek to sue Closer France.

Who will pay for the lawayers? The UK taxpayer.
Who will be awarded the winnings? The Royal family.

If the Royal Family are prepared to let the public fund their luxurious lives then the public should be allowed access all areas.

Omah · 14-09-2012, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emmetmcl

In my opinion, I think the Royal family have a cheek to sue Closer France.

Who will pay for the lawayers? The UK taxpayer.

Really?

How do you know this?

Sticks · 15-09-2012, 05:40 AM

The fault is entirely with the Duchess of Cambridge

If you do not want topless pictures of you being published, do not go topless outdoors - end of

Lets hope the courtesans at the palace rip her off several strips for this unacceptable breach of Royal Protocol.

She is expected, one day to be queen before we talk about another certain Royal, and so the rules of decorum are different and more strict, like they have to be.

This shows what I said before elsewhere, His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge should never have been allowed to marry her as she was a commoner. Experience in recent years has shown what an utter, utter disaster it has been to allow commoners into the royal family.

His Royal Highness should have been ordered to end it with Miss Middleton as she was then, and marry a princess from one of the European Royal families.

arista · 15-09-2012, 08:06 AM

"never have been allowed to marry her as she was a commoner."

But Sticks
Love is above class.

Sticks · 15-09-2012, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

"never have been allowed to marry her as she was a commoner."

But Sticks
Love is above class.

Not when it come to Royal Protocols, love should never be allowed to come into the matter.

Brides should be chosen for our royals from other royal families in order to strengthen alliances and preserve a pure royal bloodline. In days of yore, our royals were instructed on who they could and could not marry and our system worked. Ever since they allowed commoners in, it has been a total disaster, starting with Princess Anne's disastrous marriage to Captain Mark Phillips.

With privilege comes responsibilities and restrictions. They were there for a reason and the royal courtesans have been neglecting their duties by first allowing Miss Middleton to get near the prince, allowing this marriage and not instructing her in how a royal should behave.

If a man goes up to a wall of a zoo and jumps over it into the lions cage and is mauled, do we blame the lions? No, we blame the man for his reckless ans wanton behaviour.

The paparazzi can be likened to wild animals, if that is not too much of an insult to wild animals, in that they will take any opportunity they can. It is the duty of the courtesans and the royals to ensure that does not happen.

The Duchess of Cambridge was reckless by removing her top outside in the open air and the Duke of Cambridge should have known better.

Kizzy · 15-09-2012, 08:57 AM

And what happens when you condense bloodlines?...you get an eddie, haha soz ed!

I feel so sorry for William it must be so reminiscent of how it began for his mother, and to ad insult to injury the attitude of the french paps is so blase.

thesheriff443 · 15-09-2012, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kizzy

And what happens when you condense bloodlines?...you get an eddie, haha soz ed!

I feel so sorry for William it must be so reminiscent of how it began for his mother, and to ad insult to injury the attitude of the french paps is so blase.

the problem is this!
if this country prints pics of harry then kate is no different for the french.

Kizzy · 15-09-2012, 09:07 AM

As was stated in the news, harry was in a public place kate was in a private place. Thats the fundamental difference.

thesheriff443 · 15-09-2012, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kizzy

As was stated in the news, harry was in a public place kate was in a private place. Thats the fundamental difference.

no difference!
royals with their bits on display,
kate is to blame,

Kazanne · 15-09-2012, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

just beacuse its kate's tits it dont make any one a pervert for wanting to see them!!!
we all watch big brother for the same reason wanting to watch someone warts and all!

Why do you want to see Kates boobs?

they are much the same as every other females and even some men!

thesheriff443 · 15-09-2012, 09:15 AM

there is no private anymore!
and after harry's cock up the royals and their team should have been even more careful.

thesheriff443 · 15-09-2012, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kazanne

Why do you want to see Kates boobs?

they are much the same as every other females and even some men!

i was careful not to say i wanted to see them in my post

its about seeing something that your not allowed to see!
if someone says dont look it makes you want to look more!

arista · 15-09-2012, 10:06 AM

"Not when it come to Royal Protocols, love should never be allowed to come into the matter."

But Sticks
thats life
Love can take top place.

And the UK backed them.

lostalex · 15-09-2012, 10:11 AM

With all of the MANY privileges that come with being a member of a hereditary undemocratic Monarchy, there are also some consequences. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

cry me a river.

This woman (Kate) is perfectly willing to accept all of the undeserved FAME and WEALTH that come along with marrying into the monarchy, but she's not willing to accept any of downsides or consequences? sorry, but i have no sympathy. You take the good with the bad. She made her decision.

With Harry and his invasion of privacy you could at least argue that he didn't CHOOSE to be a monarch he was born into it, and at least he is actually fighting and putting his life in danger to serve his country and the allies of his country, so he deserves to have a bit of a break in Las Vegas and let go for a while. but Kate cannot make that excuse, she did choose it.

Omah · 15-09-2012, 10:44 AM

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19608872

Quote:

The Italian gossip magazine Chi has said it plans to publish photographs of the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing topless in a special issue next week.

Closer and Chi are both part of former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's Mondadori media group.

Chi said, that despite the legal row, it was planning a 26-page photo special of Catherine and William this week.

Editor Alfonso Signorini said: "The fact that these are the future rulers of England makes the article more interesting and topical.

"This is a deserving topic because it shows in a completely natural way the daily life of a very famous, young and modern couple in love," he said.

Opportunistic, mercenary and hypocritical media mogul seeks higher profile for magazine and more money for himself by exploiting gullibility of the lower social orders of latin republics .....

Omah · 15-09-2012, 01:00 PM

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/

Quote:

Republic of Ireland edition of Daily Star prints topless pictures of Duchess of Cambridge

Gutter press for scum .....

No doubt the rest of "press" will jump on the bandwagon now .....

lostalex · 15-09-2012, 01:12 PM

I saw the pics online, i can understand why she's upset... they arn't the best looking tits i've seen... small and asymetric..

If i was a girl i wouldn't wanna show them eigther...