FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
12-01-2014, 09:26 AM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Why is it that bb warn hms for racist comments/behaviour that may cause offence and homophobic comments/behaviour that may cause offence but do not to the same for sexist comments/behaviour that may cause offence. Do they not value their female audience and do they not think their feelings matter too? Many hms have demonstrated sexist behaviour and made sexist comments, Dappy's being particularly blatant and offensive - and not one word from Big Brother. Personally, I find that disgusting in 2014. When are people going to do something about this double standard from BB?
Half the staff on the show must be female, so why are such antiquated, offensive sexist comments treated differently to racist and homophobic ones by BB. Evander was reprimanded for offensive homophobic comments but nothing was said to him about his sexist ones. Frequent double standards from BB. Last edited by sassysocks; 12-01-2014 at 09:29 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:28 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Very good point SS. I would have to say yes.
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:30 AM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Yeah,Lets just give them warnings for everything.Soon the show will just be a bunch of ex celebs sat around talking about the weather,scared to say anything.The less warnings the better tbh.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:33 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Thank you Cherie. It is about time BB took the view of it's female audience as seriously as those of its male and gay audience. I really am quite gobsmacked at the blatancy of this double standard towards their female audience.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:34 AM | #5 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
In which case it should be all or nothing, they can't have it both ways. Anything else is just pure sexism.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:37 AM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Agree,Just don't think we should be encouraging more warnings and oppressive behaviour from BB
Last edited by Northern Monkey; 12-01-2014 at 09:38 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:40 AM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
If they are to be controlled as to what to say then we will not see what they are really like. Were we looking into a house, listening to all they sid, if anything that was offensive was said, we couldn't demand a warning be given. Of course a few rules are needed to curb any threats to safety of the housemates if there are consequences from the heated conversations or debate. Really though what we see and hear is often nowhere near as bad as what we could overhear at times on public transport or in other public areas. I take fully on board your last point, the less warnings the better, show them as they are and what they think,not having conversation controlled. Last edited by joeysteele; 12-01-2014 at 09:54 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:43 AM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2014, 09:43 AM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
I think OP is saying that it's sexist to warn Evander about his homophobic remarks when Dappy gets nothing. I agree though, they shouldn't have warnings in the first place, let them self-destruct.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|