[Sophiee]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

That is why he suggested that eh cooked for the boys and her the girls. So she didn't have to do everything herself.

and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...

[armand.kay]

She's being petty but that's something I would do tbh :/

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...

Because she wasn't going to cook for him and Lionel.

[Sophiee]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Because she wasn't going to cook for him and Lionel.

or because he's sexist as **** .

[bez87]

the problem is we don't get to see all the conversations, from the highlights i found her petty and childish in this situation and to blame lionel was so out of order, why bring him into it, yes he asked for the chocolates that was after lusia decided she would claim over on her own accord, but that was not the disscussion, it was about her and jasmine having make up when they both new they were not allowed it, lionel was ready to take his punishment for the chocolate's i think she was just childish when it came down to it. but jim stirs everything up lol

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

or because he's sexist as **** .

I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by bez87

the problem is we don't get to see all the conversations, from the highlights i found her petty and childish in this situation and to blame lionel was so out of order, why bring him into it, yes he asked for the chocolates that was after lusia decided she would claim over on her own accord, but that was not the disscussion, it was about her and jasmine having make up when they both new they were not allowed it, lionel was ready to take his punishment for the chocolate's i think she was just childish when it came down to it. but jim stirs everything up lol

She holds grudges.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

or because he's sexist as **** .

No because he knows the girls will side with Luisa ,its not rocket science.

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.

That's not what happened.

[Sophiee]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I don't think so. He said he was going to cook for everyone, before Louisa had her strop.

I didn't hear this .

Originally Posted by Kazanne

No because he knows the girls will side with Luisa ,its not rocket science.

casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

I didn't hear this .


casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.

It was on the highlights.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by MrWong

That's not what happened.

Yes, it did. It was on the highlights.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

or because he's sexist as **** .

THANK YOU. Jim's misogyny is disgusting and it speaks volumes that he turned "I'm not cooking for Jim and Lionel" as "I'm only cooking for the girls"

[Samm]

I wouldn't cook for someone I hate

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Sam <3

I wouldn't cook for someone I hate

I would. No worries. I'm not the best cook, but i don't hold grudges at all.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Sam <3

I wouldn't cook for someone I hate

I wouldn't cook for just them but If I was in there and cooking with the food bought by the whole houses budget (limited budget) and I was doing a huge meal with that food I wouldn't say Oh everyone but Jim can have some, it's childish and petty

[Jords]

Its not her job.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

I didn't hear this .


casey is quite friendly with him and he even got rude towards her. I've never seen him in the kitchen apart from eating, I guarantee he thinks that women should do the cooking because that's their 'job'. there's no denying that he's sexist unless you just don't want to believe it because you dislike luisa.

Just because you haven't seen him in the kitchen doesn't mean he hasn't ,we only see an hour,plus Maybe because you don't like Jim,you fail to see Luisa's faults.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Can I have a copy of the highlights that you watched please?

Initially Luisa did say that she wasn't going to cook or make the bread. Lee came in and asked if she wanted a cuppa, she declined and said I'm going to cook in a bit but not for everyone (so not as you suggest, that she only wanted to cook because Jim said he wanted to. At that point Jim hadn't even mentioned cooking)

This happened but also what Josy described was later in the HLs, Luisa went into the bedroom and told Jim she was only using one ring so he could use the other 3 if he wanted to cook.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

or because he's sexist as **** .

Do you read any of the Twitter feed? or watch any of the clips? Jim cooks for the group, we know this because Linda bitched that he had cooked too much food..he was also cooking last night after the eviction and Linda was gobbling it up, clip on the YouTube Feed, and as for his suggestion to cook for the boys, he suggested it because Luisa turned down his offer of him cooking for everyone.

Here is an example of what you are missing

11.00pm: Jim has cooked Linda a bite to eat. "Mmm, really tasty" she says. They're getting on *suspiciously* well. #bbuklive

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

and I wonder why he offered to cook for the guys only...

Hi Sophiee .
Because Luisa had said that she was not going to cook for Jim and also for Lionel so that only left 3 more boys,hence Jim saying he would cook for them.

She created something really nasty from what was a pointless thing to refuse to do in the first place.
She isn't at home, she is in the BB house and wthether they like housemates or not, I don't think I have ever come across any housemate cooking that excluded anyone before, no matter the arguments and bad feeling between them.
She was in my view absolutely pathetic.

In fact,had I been a housemate, I would have said to her, clear off, someone else or/and I will do the cooking if you are going to be that childish and stupid.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

It was on the highlights.

Yes Vanessa it was on the highlights. You are not going mad.

[Patricia4]

She is nasty she is one that love's to fall out all the time and she thinks she is big and powerful but she will land on her arse soon.
He must have done a lot of cooking at the start because Lionel moaned Jim's in the kitchen all the time.

[optimisticcynic]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

THANK YOU. Jim's misogyny is disgusting and it speaks volumes that he turned "I'm not cooking for Jim and Lionel" as "I'm only cooking for the girls"

Jim feels closer to the boys because they don't sit around constantly bickering about and judging him, and are not under orders from chief justice linda! Linda was sat on her bed telling all the girls not to dislike Jim just because she hates him for being a chauvinistic pig, which was ridiculous as she was in actual fact implanting that seed herself and she blimming knew it.

Jim probably assumes, from what is constantly said to him that his only chance of solidarity now lies with the boys of the house, and he is more likely to achieve a peacemaking split with him cooking for the boys and Luisa cooking for her coven. He did nothing wrong in this instance and people seeking to blame him for Luisa's tantrum, having disadvantaged the whole house by breaking rules with the champagne and make-up, lack objectivity in this instance. Refusing to help bake bread, having been the cause of worse than basic rations for the week shows how self-centred she is. "Poor me, I've unrepentently shafted you all for a week, and for some reason you're upset with me...." Bellend!

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by optimisticcynic

Jim feels closer to the boys because they don't sit around constantly bickering about and judging him, and are not under orders from chief justice linda! Linda was sat on her bed telling all the girls not to dislike Jim just because she hates him for being a chauvinistic pig, which was ridiculous as she was in actual fact implanting that seed herself and she blimming knew it.

Jim probably assumes, from what is constantly said to him that his only chance of solidarity now lies with the boys of the house, and he is more likely to achieve a peacemaking split with him cooking for the boys and Luisa cooking for her coven. He did nothing wrong in this instance and people seeking to blame him for Luisa's tantrum, having disadvantaged the whole house by breaking rules with the champagne and make-up, lack objectivity in this instance. Refusing to help bake bread, having been the cause of worse than basic rations for the week shows how self-centred she is. "Poor me, I've unrepentently shafted you all for a week, and for some reason you're upset with me...." Bellend!

He IS a chauvinistic pig though. You can't say he didn't do anything wrong when he groups all the girls together (per usual) when not all of them dislike him. He's the biggest self-victimizer in the house and if you don't see that you're blind and/or extremely biased.