[Robodog]

Rachel Morris and Kate Marlow are not great at the best of times but tonight's show was awful from both of them.

I find it pretty worrying that both of them appear under some kind of banner marked 'psychologist' when really they are just giving their personal opinions like a regular panelist.

Fair enough they don't like Jim/Dexter/Aaron whoever but they really went for it tonight with uncomfortable amounts of bias, cheap shots and insults - no real psychological overview as you'd hope from the 'psych' show.

They had none of the fairness, balance, consideration, grace or eloquence of other psychologists such as Diane Youdale, Dr Funke etc. And certainly none of the sense of humour that those other psychologists have.

I think Rachel insulted the BB viewers tonight saying that Jim votes were just out of sympathy!
Err no Rachel - some people do actually like him for who he is!
BB viewers are not stupid and can make up their own minds about a housemate without a BOTP psychologist dismissing their thinking as wrong! How insulting!

Kate accused Jim of being an all out liar - 'it's in his narrow eyes and stiff arms! ' ?? WTF?
I've never heard such a load of rubbish. This is not psychology, this is just daft (and slightly spiteful) personal opinion making dressed up as psychology.

Ironically, they showed far more prejudice and negativity towards Jim in that one hour than has actually come from him in the entire 3 weeks!

I don't mind such opinions from a regular panelist or audience member but from a 'psychologist' i'd expect better.

Especially after Jim actually had a great show with his tree house talks, not one second of aggro and even managed to bond with Luisa and make her smile! All of which the BOTP panel chose to completely ignore.

Hope he wins now.

[joeysteele]

100% I agree, I think this was a really bad one tonight,full stop.

[abhorson]

The liar comment was unbelievable.

[Kazanne]

You gotto laugh really as they are so so pissed off that Jim is liked

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

You gotto laugh really as they are so so pissed off that Jim is liked

Linda is trying her best to get the public to hate Jim. I wonder which other story she will sell next?

[abhorson]

And the turnip who looks nothing like Annie Lennox was not doing what she is payed for. It was just anti-Jim propaganda.

[abhorson]

But McGiff was not too bad imo. She toned it down.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by abhorson

But McGiff was not too bad imo. She toned it down.

Yes, i was shocked by that. She changed her tune fast.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by abhorson

But McGiff was not too bad imo. She toned it down.

I usually cannot stand Carol but tonight she was much fairer than usual.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

You gotto laugh really as they are so so pissed off that Jim is liked

Haha true!

[LaLaLand]

The Annie Lennox one just emits "feminist" so she's going to hate Jim full stop, awful panel.

[Sophiee]

carol's opinions .

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I usually cannot stand Carol but tonight she was much fairer than usual.

Yeah i agree, she was pretty good tonight. She has a good bounce with Iain which makes her lighter and more of a laugh.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

carol's opinions .

Yes, were great. She said Jim would win.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by abhorson

Yes, were great. She said Jim would win.

[Jordan.]

Stop crying just cause they don't like your faves

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Stop crying just cause they don't like your faves

It's beyond that - i'd feel the same whoever they were talking about.

Those two talk like regular panelists - not psychologists - and that kinda needs pointing out.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Stop crying just cause they don't like your faves

Not crying, they all said Jim will win. They were all right. So credit to them.

[Lex]

Twas a complete hatchet job by the almighty bb "winner-deciders" on the peoples favourite hm Jim!...Linda was creaming her pants!

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Robodog

It's beyond that - i'd feel the same whoever they were talking about.

Those two talk like regular panelists - not psychologists - and that kinda needs pointing out.

[abhorson]

It was almost hate from them two, not professional at all.

[Jordan.]

It's just a trashy spin off. Do you really expect it to be a deep psychology show?

[MarcusMel]

You can only give offence to people who take offence. If you get angry or upset by what someone says then they are going against your beliefs of how people should behave and you are the one with the problem of dealing with health damaging emotion.

You are welcome to your beliefs, but can you reason out why you have them? How do you know that you are right and everyone with the opposite view is wrong?

For example where does the how the british feel about the French come from.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

It's just a trashy spin off. Do you really expect it to be a deep psychology show?

Only when discussing Jim, they're not allowed to say anything negative about him. it's hilarious when 'comedians' go on there and call Linda fat though apparently.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by abhorson

It was almost hate from them two, not professional at all.

I agree. I only liked Ian Lee. he was spot on in everything he said.