[lostalex]

Originally Posted by the truth

DLT has been found innocent. anything else said against him is slander and lies. He should sue for damages and the false accusers who lied should be tried for perjury and if proven to have lied , should face prison time. This protects the falsely accused and also discourages liars and false accusers and gold diggers. We can then have a system which concentrates more time and resources on the legitimate victims and the falsely accused.

I hope he's a christian so he can rot in the hell he deserves. unfortunately there's not a hell, and he just got to abuse young girls for his own pleasure and the british establishment gave him permission to do it.

shame on him, and shame on us.

[Vicky.]

Indeed. The reason rape and abuse is so common is because people like me think its a waste of time reporting it years later when theres no chance of there being evidence..and after theres been menntion of compensation

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Indeed. The reason rape and abuse is so common is because people like me think its a waste of time reporting it years later when theres no chance of there being evidence..and after theres been menntion of compensation

heaven forbid a rape victim expect any kind of compensation. meanwhile look at all the whiney brits screaming for compensation from the government over the floods...

[the truth]

Originally Posted by lostalex

I hope he's a christian so he can rot in the hell he deserves. unfortunately there's not a hell, and he just got to abuse young girls for his own pleasure and the british establishment gave him permission to do it.

shame on him, and shame on us.

deranged hysterical slanderous nonsense. shame on you

[Livia]

Originally Posted by lostalex

you shouldn't have to have evidence to tell the truth.... and don't you think that these guys TARGETTED these girls BECAUSE they wouldn't be believed? it's like they are being raped all over again.

Sexual Predators specifically target girls they know are the most vulnerable. The same way serial killers often target prostitutes and drug addicts because they know that they are less likely to be missed when they go missing.

These predators are not stupid.

Firstly, this man has been found not guilty by a court of law and a jury of his peers. You cannot include him in the line "these guys" nor accuse him of targeting anyone.

I was talking about the law, Alex. In a court of law you need evidence. Sadly, human being cannot be relied upon to tell the truth.

The accused man could be telling the truth. Then what? You're just going to buy the biggest sob story and to hell with the facts?

[Vicky.]

Didnt know anyone was asking for compensation from the floods tbh..people want help with accomodation and such and rebuilding their homes..which isnt too unreasonable given that the government could have at the very least lessened the damage if they had had any sense

[Vicky.]

Dont see what the floods have to do with hundreds of women claiming to have been raped after the news mentions compensation for saville victims though

[Livia]

Originally Posted by lostalex

heaven forbid a rape victim expect any kind of compensation. meanwhile look at all the whiney brits screaming for compensation from the government over the floods...

Pack in the racist bullsh1t Alex. I'm tired of it. It actually says in the rules it won't be tolerated.

[arista]

Here we go again , sadly


today going to Court

Dave Lee Travis To Face Sex Assault Retrial
http://news.sky.com/story/1216316/da...ssault-retrial

[Nedusa]

I think they have to try and force a conclusion on this as he would have had these other two charges still not refuted in a court of law. So hopefully this trial will be the quickest in History with the verdict a reasounding NOT GUILTY

Hopefully he can clear his name 100%............

[joeysteele]

I really think this is a pathetic decision by the CPS, this is another likely waste of court time and money.
A jury couldn't make a decision but we have no idea how big the split was.
Bearing in mind he was found not guilty on all the other counts and that indeed on any of the charges, the judge was willing to accept a 10-2 majority verdict, then clearly the split on these were even wider.

I see no point at all, although admittedly I don't know the details of the case,in bringing this to court again.

"...but now bareback in court."

[LeatherTrumpet]

quack quack

OOPS

[arista]

Prosecutors seek a retrial for the former Radio 1 DJ on one count
of indecent assault and another of sexual assault.


DLT The Nightmare Goes On

[LeatherTrumpet]

Is that Jimmy Saville inbetwixt him and his wife?

[arista]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Is that Jimmy Saville inbetwixt him and his wife?

No his legal team

[Sticks]

I suspect they will get the conviction on those two charges at the retrial, and he will be sent down for the maximum time, with the CPS then appealing against the leniency of the sentence.

After all, a previous jury could not acquit him of those charges, so there must be something in them. (No smoke and all that...)

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by arista

No his legal team

Jesus H it looks like a Bouncer, a baglady and a Jimmy Saville Transexual tribute act

[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by Sticks

I suspect they will get the conviction on those two charges at the retrial, and he will be sent down for the maximum time, with the CPS then appealing against the leniency of the sentence.

After all, a previous jury could not acquit him of those charges, so there must be something in them. (No smoke and all that...)

I must agree I am also a bit puzzled as to why the CPS have decided to go for another trial in relation to these two undecided charges. Given the now increasing public backlash to seeing well known aging Celebrity men being put through this trial by media and given most of the outcomes from these types of historical sex abuse cases, the CPS must know the chances of a conviction are remote.

Unless of course there is new evidence or some other reason then I cannot understand why they would be happy for this poor man to be dragged through the Courts again. You have to feel a certain sympathy for him.

[joeysteele]

I think whatever the make up of the jury in the new trial, because again he is certainly not going to plead guilty, that they will be well versed as to the publicity of this case and will not be likely able to come to an impartial decision as to it really.

I know were I to be called to the jury for this one, I would be thinking of his not guilty verdicts for so many other charges.
I would likely afford him thefull benefit of the doubt and not have enough certainty at all to find him guilty.
I also think that is what the verdict will be whenever it comes this time round too.

[arista]

Sadly charged again

[Dave Lee Travis Charged With Indecent Assault


Dave Lee Travis is to be charged with one count of indecent assault,
weeks after being cleared of 12 separate counts of indecent assault.
Travis was cleared of 12 charges of indecent assault earlier this year
but two charges remained undecided. At Southwark Crown Court
today he heard he will now be charged with a further count of indecent assault.
Prosecutor Miranda Moore told the court today that the former DJ is expected
to face a trial on the two outstanding charges.]

http://news.sky.com/story/1233569/da...decent-assault

[LeatherTrumpet]

more wasting police time, it beggars belief

[Sticks]

Come on, they need a win, so the more charges, the better the chances of taking him down, after all they can't get Jimmy Saville, grant them their indulgences...

[Josy]

3 months suspended sentence

[Sticks]

Watch the DPP appeal the gross leniency of that sentence, saying he should have got life without parole, doing hard labour breaking rocks in solitary confinement etc..