[icecakes]

Why didnt they stick with ashleigh

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by wormsinfested

They knew Steven is hated on the outside so why vote him out when Danielle was a bigger competition. And if Pav or Zoe is up against Steven, Steven will go.

But then what? The only way they have a chance to beat someone else is if they are popular. Getting rid of Steven would give them big boost in popularity.

[Tarryn]

Biannca & Zoe only ever seemed to seriously consider the girls for eviction.
Pav wanted to evict Steven from the start but backed down.
Girls hate girls. This series shows that.

[susie q]

[QUOTE=armand.kay;7073558]Wouldn't you want to save the most hated housemate for when you are up so they are against you?[/QUOTE
I thought this to, I think they were both being tactical, hope there both up soon/.

[CaudleHalbard]

Thry should have evicted Mark.

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Thry should have evicted Mark.

No, one week they should fake evict Mark for laugh Don't know how they would do it though

[Nell_McCoy]

Zoe not only LIKES 2 second Steve, she sees him as the innocent party of a failing romance and has been planning to replace Kimbot in his affections. Pav did not want to make himself unpopular with the most powerful people in the house.

[Miranda123]

Originally Posted by Achilles

Do they really think other housemates would be that bothered?!?!?

cause they want to be in the cool gang and the cool gang like Steven cause they dont see what we see..............

they should have worried more about pissing off the public, we are the ones who ultimately kick them out (well, when we get a bloody chance to!)

[Kizzy]

I am so surprised they didn't use that as a reason to get rid... Oh he really needed to be out to see kim if they knew then she wasn't going back in they would've I bet.

[Miranda123]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I am so surprised they didn't use that as a reason to get rid... Oh he really needed to be out to see kim if they knew then she wasn't going back in they would've I bet.

Its funny how they forgot all about the public when they said Danielle

Or maybe they wanted to give Kim time to get out of the country lol

[Fendertele]

Originally Posted by clao

bianca had more of a backbone than pav, great choice to save him, so much for him supposedly having the ability to manipulate people, he was a push over with the two girls

Bianca only had the 'backbone' to put any of the 'outsiders' group up, she would never cross Helen's crew. It needs some-one in there to make the first strong move against them, and not back down and they will be over.....after all they are not your friends in there, they will all do you for the prize money... Big Brother is human behaviour at it's lowest common denominator...

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by Fendertele

Bianca only had the 'backbone' to put any of the 'outsiders' group up, she would never cross Helen's crew. It needs some-one in there to make the first strong move against them, and not back down and they will be over.....after all they are not your friends in there, they will all do you for the prize money... Big Brother is human behaviour at it's lowest common denominator...

If the 3 newbies genuinely had the power and it wasn't BB making the decisions, then Zoe is to blame for Steven still being on our screens. Pav suggested Steven and Zoe said she didn't like Steven in her VT. Why did she stop them choosing him?

[Daffodil]

To be fair, I think they chose Danielle becuase she had become visibly withdrawn and was looking miserable. It WOULD have been fannytastic if they had evicted Steven BUT we would have been robbed of seeing him suffer the fallout from Kimberly leaving and his increasing desperation to stay in after hearing those boos. So in a way it was good they didn't evict him. Let him suffer and wither before our eyes, then he can be booted!!!

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by Daffodil

To be fair, I think they chose Danielle becuase she had become visibly withdrawn and was looking miserable. It WOULD have been fannytastic if they had evicted Steven BUT we would have been robbed of seeing him suffer the fallout from Kimberly leaving and his increasing desperation to stay in after hearing those boos. So in a way it was good they didn't evict him. Let him suffer and wither before our eyes, then he can be booted!!!

Who will nominate him? There is not going to be any meltdown, he is just going to carry on being the same knob we all know he is.

[Fendertele]

Originally Posted by Achilles

Who will nominate him? There is not going to be any meltdown, he is just going to carry on being the same knob we all know he is.

I agree, I think he will be with us for the duration......

[Daffodil]

I think some of the housemates may nominate him 'so he can return to Kimberly'. It's a good excuse anyway.

[Creggle]

Yep he may become a throw away nomination, fingers crossed. Can you imagine his reaction to being up? WHY DID THEY PUT ME UP BIG BROTHER IM ****ING PERFECT HOW DARE THEY, MAKE ME IMMUNE RIGHT NOW. Wouldn't surprise me if they did.

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by Craigy_CraigO

Yep he may become a throw away nomination, fingers crossed. Can you imagine his reaction to being up? WHY DID THEY PUT ME UP BIG BROTHER IM ****ING PERFECT HOW DARE THEY, MAKE ME IMMUNE RIGHT NOW. Wouldn't surprise me if they did.

If he gets nominated and BB come up with a twist to save him it would be me having a meltdown

[Patricia4]

Pav should of stayed with his first one to go Steven because I think Biannca said to them you pick and I will agree he could of got him out if he'd pushed it.
But now we have another week of this vile human being he was even making a joke of the crowd shouting 2 seconds Steven what a loser.

[Achilles]

Originally Posted by Patricia4

Pav should of stayed with his first one to go Steven because I think Biannca said to them you pick and I will agree he could of got him out if he'd pushed it.
But now we have another week of this vile human being he was even making a joke of the crowd shouting 2 seconds Steven what a loser.

I think the reason he was acting so blase about it all and neither him nor Kimberly have shown any sign of regret or shame is because nothing actually happened. They didn't have sex. They only need to make the viewers think they did. Covers moving and moaning proves nothing. Why don't they bonk naked in the garden if they've no shame?

[lostalex]

i think it's obvious, they said Danielle because they thought that's what the public wanted. there's nothing more to it.

[Sophiee]

Originally Posted by lostalex

i think it's obvious, they said Danielle because they thought that's what the public wanted. there's nothing more to it.

even though they were clearly chanting '2 second steven' and 'get steven out'?

I think they simply wanted to keep steven, but out of the ones who were in their firing line (ashleigh and danielle) they were going for the least popular with the public.

[MojoNixon]

Pav is sneaky little ****. You can see it in his eyes. I would not trust him at all.

[Winkie Expand]

Originally Posted by lostalex

i think it's obvious, they said Danielle because they thought that's what the public wanted. there's nothing more to it.

The only thing to be heard was a loud, unison chant of "Get Steven Out!" and "2 Second Steven!".

If it was the will of the public they wanted to represent, Pav and Zoe would have immediately called out Steven's name.

Much as I want Steven to go, I'm glad that Kimberly got a head start and gets far, far away.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Winkie Expand

The only thing to be heard was a loud, unison chant of "Get Steven Out!" and "2 Second Steven!".

If it was the will of the public they wanted to represent, Pav and Zoe would have immediately called out Steven's name.

Much as I want Steven to go, I'm glad that Kimberly got a head start and gets far, far away.

BS!!! You must be Stevens friend!