[Robodog]

I'm not 'anti' Pav.

But i'm not 'pro' Pav either.

In fact i'm not 'anything' Pav as Pav (IMO) hasn't brought anything to the show.

Despite his VT giving it the large (as they all do in their VTs) - the only thing he has done in the house is talk about where he stands in the group and how he doesn't feel accepted. And weeks later - he is still saying it.

Yet Zoe and Biannca were in there for much less time than Pav - but they never kept talking about it like he does - they just got on with it and dived head first into the experience.

He seems like an ok guy but in terms of this being a TV show - i honestly don't get why would anyone want Pav to win ? (unless it was because they disliked all other finalists)

Am i missing something?

[Yaki da]

A sense of irony.

[Robodog]

You mean it would be ironic for the person who did the least to win the show?

That would be ironic alright. It happened last year.

[Alf]

Attention

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by wannashag

Attention

You mean people want Pav to win out of attention?

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Purely to take the piss.

Its a shame he may end up winning, the public should really be voting whos provided the best entertainment.

Its actually quite insulting to him aswell but im sure the 100k will ease that.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Robodog

You mean people want Pav to win out of attention?

I'm not telling you.

You'll just have to make up your own conclusion.

[Lister of Smeg]

Hipsters

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Purely to take the piss.

Its a shame he may end up winning, the public should really be voting whos provided the best entertainment.

Its actually quite insulting to him aswell but im sure the 100k will ease that.

Ha yeah - he won't be complaining. Remember his first moment in the diary when he shouted 'Gimme da power!' ?

But yeah. The 'anti-vote' is about the only reason i can see people voting Pav. Certainly not for entertainment value.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by wannashag

I'm not telling you.

You'll just have to make up your own conclusion.

OK. I have made my conclusion.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Robodog

I'm not 'anti' Pav.

But i'm not 'pro' Pav either.

In fact i'm not 'anything' Pav as Pav (IMO) hasn't brought anything to the show.

Despite his VT giving it the large (as they all do in their VTs) - the only thing he has done in the house is talk about where he stands in the group and how he doesn't feel accepted. And weeks later - he is still saying it.

Yet Zoe and Biannca were in there for much less time than Pav - but they never kept talking about it like he does - they just got on with it and dived head first into the experience.

He seems like an ok guy but in terms of this being a TV show - i honestly don't get why would anyone want Pav to win ? (unless it was because they disliked all other finalists)

Am i missing something?

Same ole reasons. "Pav has been misunderstood". "Pav has not been treated right". "No one gives him a change".

Oh please...other new housemates were on same position. Only "poor" Pav did suffer...

[reece(:]

As a joke?

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg

Hipsters

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Same ole reasons. "Pav has been misunderstood". "Pav has not been treated right". "No one gives him a change".

Oh please...other new housemates were on same position. Only "poor" Pav did suffer...

Love how you've got Regan as your avatar btw

Total legend

[Fish_Fingers]

The only scenario that I would want him to win in would be if the final three were him, Ash and Helen.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Robodog

Love how you've got Regan as your avatar btw

Total legend

[Tregard]

Protest vote

[Withano]

The rest are try-hards

[billy123]

Because he isnt a twat?

[DanielLuis]

He has 0 chance. He will fight with Ash for 5th place, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of them broke Jenny's great record of 0.9% to win in the voting.

[Ammi]

..as a person he seems nice but as a housemate he's contributed nothing to the series and for me it would be all kinds of wrong for him to win..I think I would even rather Helen won as she's been the 'bigger housemate'..unless I'm missing something, it seems like maybe people less want him to win than don't want others to but that seems like for all the wrong reasons in the spirit of the 'game'....

[AarynGriesfan]

Originally Posted by DanielLuis

He has 0 chance. He will fight with Ash for 5th place, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of them broke Jenny's great record of 0.9% to win in the voting.

Poor Jenny

[mrflibble]

Originally Posted by Ammi

..as a person he seems nice but as a housemate he's contributed nothing to the series and for me it would be all kinds of wrong for him to win..I think I would even rather Helen won as she's been the 'bigger housemate'..unless I'm missing something, it seems like maybe people less want him to win than don't want others to but that seems like for all the wrong reasons in the spirit of the 'game'....

Yep. I don't hate the guy, but I just don't care. He's a non-entity and brings only slightly less than Ash and Winston - but at least they've actually done the occasional thing and been there the whole time. I suppose people would vote for him if they hate all the other housemates, but if they hated all of them that strongly I don't know why they're still watching or at least voting.

I only watched last year's recently, but I went in knowing that Sam won and I kept waiting for him to do something and I barely saw him until the final week when he kept arguing with Dexter. It felt really anti-climactic when he won, even if he seemed like a nice enough guy. You'd think people would want a winner who brings the series full circle and rewarding the person who's contributed the most to the series. I can understand arguments for all the finalists except for Ash and Pav, totally dumbfounded as to why people would want them to win the most.

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by mrflibble

Yep. I don't hate the guy, but I just don't care. He's a non-entity and brings only slightly less than Ash and Winston - but at least they've actually done the occasional thing and been there the whole time. I suppose people would vote for him if they hate all the other housemates, but if they hated all of them that strongly I don't know why they're still watching or at least voting.

I only watched last year's recently, but I went in knowing that Sam won and I kept waiting for him to do something and I barely saw him until the final week when he kept arguing with Dexter. It felt really anti-climactic when he won, even if he seemed like a nice enough guy. You'd think people would want a winner who brings the series full circle and rewarding the person who's contributed the most to the series. I can understand arguments for all the finalists except for Ash and Pav, totally dumbfounded as to why people would want them to win the most.

..I agree and also with Ash as he's just 'coasted' his way through and thought that was enough to make him someone who shouldn't be nominated..OH MY GOD, HOW COULD ANYONE THINK I SHOULD DESERVE TO BE UP..??????..but at least he's been there from the beginning and provided a few lesser memorable moments compared to Pav...I like the nicer person to win or who I think is a nicer person, that's just obvious really but not to the point of wanting someone who has been fairly insignificant to the whole show to win over someone I really didn't like but who has been a big part of it because the old cliché....it's just a game/not personal feelings as such and the person contributing more to a game for me would always be more deserving....

[Vanessa]

Because he's a nice guy. I like him myself. He's not in my top three, but i'm glad he's still there.