FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB16 Big Brother 16 aka Big Brother: Timebomb started 12th May 2015, and was won by Chloe Wilburn. Discuss the housemates and show in this forum.
Housemates (tags):
Aaron,
Adjoa,
Amy,
Chloe,
Cristian,
Danny,
Eileen,
Harriet,
Harry Amelia,
Jack,
Jade,
Joel,
Kieran,
Marc,
Nick,
Sally,
Sam,
Sarah,
Simon,
HM Fan clubs (appreciation) ... Legend HMs:
Aisleyne Horgan-Wallace,
Brian Belo,
Helen Wood,
Nikki Grahame,
-- |
View Poll Results: Vote to Save or Vote to Evict? | ||||||
Vote To Save | 19 | 52.78% | ||||
|
||||||
Vote To Evict | 12 | 33.33% | ||||
|
||||||
Don't care | 5 | 13.89% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-01-2015, 12:17 AM | #26 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
They should stick with the noms rules they have now - 3 or more up.
But 3+ up is pointless unless it's VTS, as a head2head just becomes a reverse VTE. So yeah, VTS with 3+ up please.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 10:50 AM | #27 | |||
|
||||
Simba Wiv Ya Friggin ‘Air
|
To be honest my favourite format of vote is when every housemate with one nomination or more gets put up. If I was producer I would do this but maybe up it every housemate with two nominations or more in a vote to save
I mean surely they make more money plus it gets rid of boring non entity housemates |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 02:03 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Definitely a vote to SAVE. And with no pass to the final or "killer" nomination please!
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 02:05 PM | #29 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes I think even if you just get 1 nomination then you should automatically be put up. Then there is more choice in a vote to save! I am sick of some housemates sailing through and getting away with not being put up for eviction!
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 05:24 PM | #30 | |||
|
||||
-
|
I don't get the hype for VTS.
It failed to save Frenchy in CBB14, in a 6 way vote against Ricci Guarnaccio FGS. I don't mind it for CBB, but for the ordinary BB, I think VTE is perfect. In hindsight, VTS wouldn't have changed BB15 much. Possibly Week 1 and 3 evictions would have been different. Are we also forgetting that Biannca was evicted against Pav in a VTS? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 06:02 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
As Told by Troy
|
All VTS does is keep ****heads like Conor and Jim Davidson in. VTE at least gives us the chance to get rid of them.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2015, 06:09 PM | #32 | |||
|
||||
like the boys
|
Quote:
Both systems have their flaws but at least VTS is the fairest way of measuring popularity. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-02-2015, 07:24 AM | #33 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Evict. It's classic Big brother.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
03-02-2015, 04:12 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
I voted "I don't care" on the poll because there are instances where it has the opposite effect from the one expected, but I do prefer VTE as it generally punishes nastiness, while VTS has rewarded it plenty of times. There's less satisfaction of a twat getting the most votes and being turfed out, the twats are usually kept around and are given the chance to feel like their ****ty behaviour is valued.
And as ruiphillips says, VTE feels like classic BB. Last edited by Lostie!; 03-02-2015 at 04:14 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-02-2015, 01:14 PM | #35 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
Vote To Save because that (usually) ensures that the best housemates stay in and the bores leave early.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-02-2015, 02:21 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
As Told by Troy
|
does is tho.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-02-2015, 02:51 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Both have pros and cons. In bigger evictions VTS is actually useless at times (Leslie & Frenchy both going springs to mind)
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-02-2015, 03:24 PM | #38 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
Quote:
I honestly think it would work much better with civillian series as A) None of them have pre-existing fans to begin with B) The civillians series with VTS still had the 2 or more up rule, so I think they need to do a tester series with 3 or 4+ up VTS in a civillian series and see the outcome.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-02-2015, 03:53 PM | #39 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
VTS as long as that's not an exuse to put more than 2 housemates up for eviction. Just 2 unless its a tie
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-02-2015, 02:21 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
-
|
I just kinda missed the old days where you had two massive characters pitted against eachother.. The atmosphere was amazing... But what with producers sticking up who they please, whenever they please and rushed, sloppy eviction shows with the same awful crowd, it doesn't happen now
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:06 PM | #41 | ||
|
|||
we
|
I know there's other threads but I couldn't find them, I've changed my mind after tonight!
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:08 PM | #42 | |||
|
||||
Can I get a witness?
|
I've grown to prefer the traditional VTE
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:09 PM | #43 | |||
|
||||
-
|
It got rid of Marco and gave us the first male first boot
so VTE >> |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:09 PM | #44 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
Changed my mind now
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:10 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
-
|
VTS for CBB though cause it's shorter and idc if I lose one my faves in CBB cause it's only like 3 weeks anyway
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:10 PM | #46 | ||
|
|||
we
|
Yeah ia, the VTE for civilian and VTS for CBB has worked in the long run
Last edited by Samm; 17-06-2016 at 10:11 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-06-2016, 10:12 PM | #47 | |||
|
||||
like the boys
|
Civilian BB makes me hate VTE and CBB makes me hate VTS and overall this show just makes me hate the British public so yeah I'm fickle like that
(but currently, VTE > VTS) |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|