About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

Marsh. · 13-01-2015, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesy

Also if a young good looking guy made comments about arses no one would say anything and there would be no warning.

Proof?

You can't claim hypotheticals as fact when they haven't happened.

Braden · 13-01-2015, 01:49 PM

Production have a show to make.

To blame them for Ken's ignorance is completely ridiculous.

Caballo · 13-01-2015, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

That came about when Jeremy took it upon himself to open her gown, nothing to do with Ken.

She said it to Ken during the fairystory task too

Denver · 13-01-2015, 01:54 PM

With recent news obviously they are scared to say anything to the woman i mean Cami biting Ken is worse then all the rest yet it was covered up and she wasnt warned

Niamh. · 13-01-2015, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth

she had no right to go into his toilet, with no clothes on under a robe too
he was sick, drunk and vulnerable and she took advantage of him to destroy his reputation, sick bitch

Jose Mourinho · 13-01-2015, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

I cant see what Ken did wrong!

In my eyes all he did was chat to a friend mentioning the negro word,second time he was just telling cheggers a story about frank Bruno.

BB is the ones who aired it, if they are that bothered about people being offended then why air it ?

More to it in my eytes, perhaps people had threatened to walk!

And this crap about chloe, jesus.. her excuse is, it's my body and I do it when I'm in control, so don't look at my arse.

The first time he used the words Negro.. he clearly upset the only black person in the house...Alexander. The second time he used it.. Whether or not he was "Just" telling a story, that story itself was quite offensive. Considering how he used that word the way he did.

Jose Mourinho · 13-01-2015, 02:41 PM

I would truly love to hear Frank Bruno's opinion... is Ken's story even true? I doubt Frank would have turned down the music after that.

MB. · 13-01-2015, 02:45 PM

I think it's been made very clear that Ken was at fault, considering he was kicked out for multiple rule breaking despite having been warned against it. His fans need to let a few more things go, because these all of these threads are ending the same way.

Jose Mourinho · 13-01-2015, 02:49 PM

Yep I think some people fail to realise you don't only have to say something directly to a person for to be deemed offensive.

cfromhx02 · 13-01-2015, 02:52 PM

Garbage.

Ken deliberately sued the N word when he could've used something else.That's why it was wrong,because he chose to use it when he could use something else.

That wasn't BB who did that.

He also came out with the "half slut", "scrubbber", "she likes a god whipping" & several arse comments then went to the bathroom several times and was seen perving at their arses,

so several examples of treating women like sex objects,pieces of meat.

BB didn't make him do any of that.

Yet again its like all the complaints about things being too PC which we so boringly and predictably have to hear so many times over and over again.

Complaints about that as well as making out you haven't seen these things are just attempts as is Katies sh*t about it being about honesty,

these things are all,ironically,dishonestly used,to try and excuse and justify the people you views abuse of others so that in turn if they get away wiuth it it lets you get away with your abuse

and lack of thought for others online and excuses your abuse to others online.
'

parmnion · 13-01-2015, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jose Mourinho

Yep I think some people fail to realise you don't only have to say something directly to a person for to be deemed offensive.

Thing is though, he was talking to cheggers with no one else in the room, telling him a story word for word.
Cheggers wasn't offended, ken wasn't offended, and by all accounts frank Bruno wasn't offended, so why did bb even bother airing it...cause that is the only offensive thing about it all.

parmnion · 13-01-2015, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

Garbage.

Ken deliberately sued the N word when he could've used something else.That's why it was wrong,because he chose to use it when he could use something else.

That wasn't BB who did that.

He also came out with the "half slut", "scrubbber", "she likes a god whipping" & several arse comments then went to the bathroom several times and was seen perving at their arses,

so several examples of treating women like sex objects,pieces of meat.

BB didn't make him do any of that.

How you or anyone who backs him,which if course I expected,as it's typical of some of the scum who follow this show online,how you or anyone have not seen what he did is beyond me.

Yet again its like all the complaints about things being too PC which we so boringly and predictably have to hear so many times over and over again.

Complaints about that as well as making out you haven't seen these things are just attempts as is Katies sh*t about it being about honesty,

these things are all,ironically,dishonestly used,to try and excuse and justify the people you views abuse of others so that in turn if they get away wiuth it it lets you get away with your abuse

and lack of thought for others online and excuses your abuse to others online.
'

oh get off your high horse for god sake.

The half slut etc comments were ken hamming it up, having a laugh and over acting the part..it's what dramatic people do!

Like she's never heard anything like that before for god sake, pure and simple, people are offended by it cause ken looks like your stereotypical old man.

Old men can get flirty and sexual as well you know, stop being so bloody agiest.

MB. · 13-01-2015, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

Thing is though, he was talking to cheggers with no one else in the room, telling him a story word for word.
Cheggers wasn't offended, ken wasn't offended, and by all accounts frank Bruno wasn't offended, so why did bb even bother airing it...cause that is the only offensive thing about it all.

Because it broke the rules (on top of the previous times he'd done so) and as a result, he was ejected. If you want to watch a show where important events are completely ignored just because they show someone you like in a negative light, I don't know if BB's the one for you.

Jose Mourinho · 13-01-2015, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

Thing is though, he was talking to cheggers with no one else in the room, telling him a story word for word.
Cheggers wasn't offended, ken wasn't offended, and by all accounts frank Bruno wasn't offended, so why did bb even bother airing it...cause that is the only offensive thing about it all.

How do we know Frank was not offended.. I have even questioned the authenticity of his story, lets hear from Frank himself before you decide for him shall we? If does not matter if noone else was in the room, so what it makes it ok for him to use that word behind our backs but not to our faces? What would Alexander have said if he was in the same room? Hearing that word again? not to mention the fact he is live on national T.V with people of all different ethnicities also watching.

Black people DO get offended by the use of that word in today's modern society, no matter what some people might try to drill into your head.. Alexander is the simplest example I can give you.

parmnion · 13-01-2015, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB.

Because it broke the rules (on top of the previous times he'd done so) and as a result, he was ejected. If you want to watch a show where important events are completely ignored just because they show someone you like in a negative light, I don't know if BB's the one for you.

what important events are you on about?

The paris attacks or something like that?
Sorry but they are cut of from the outside so I doubt we can get any topical debate going.

Perhaps you mean over buying of bananas as being the important event?

who decides whats offensive anyway, cause I'm sure as **** it aint us!!

parmnion · 13-01-2015, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jose Mourinho

How do we know Frank was not offended.. I have even questioned the authenticity of his story, lets hear from Frank himself before you decide for him shall we? If does not matter if noone else was in the room, so what it makes it ok for him to use that word behind our backs but not to our faces? What would Alexander have said if he was in the same room? Hearing that word again? not to mention the fact he is live on national T.V with people of all different ethnicities also watching.

Black people DO get offended by the use of that word in today's modern society, no matter what some people might try to drill into your head.. Alexander is the simplest example I can give you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_(music)

he was only describing something that is something.

MB. · 13-01-2015, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

what important events are you on about?

The paris attacks or something like that?
Sorry but they are cut of from the outside so I doubt we can get any topical debate going.

Perhaps you mean over buying of bananas as being the important event?

who decides whats offensive anyway, cause I'm sure as **** it aint us!!

Yep, yep. I'm changing the conversation to discuss the Paris attacks in a thread about Ken Morley. Nail on the head.

rionablue · 13-01-2015, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth

she had no right to go into his toilet, with no clothes on under a robe too
he was sick, drunk and vulnerable and she took advantage of him to destroy his reputation, sick bitch

Your user name is a joke if this is what you think. Chloe and the other girls went in to see if he was alright. If Chloe wanted to seduce him or flash him or WHATEVER THE **** you are insinuating about her taking advantage to destroy him I am sure she would use something better than a sick invested TOILET to do it. JESUSSSSSSSSSSS! And lets be honest Jeremy overstepped the line and CHLOE did not say she wanted him removed or carry on the'poor victim' thing she has been accused of doing which she could have for days afterwards if she wanted air time and to be sympathised with

Daniel. · 13-01-2015, 03:05 PM

The Truth really is an ironic username for someone who talks such rubbish. Disgusting post.

Jose Mourinho · 13-01-2015, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_(music)

he was only describing something that is something.

"Spirituals (or Negro spirituals[1][2][3][4][5][6]) are religious (generally Christian) songs that were created by enslaved African people in the United States."

Point out to US ALL what is wrong with the very first sentence in that link you posted.. If you seriously think that is normal..there is something very wrong with you..