[Headie]

This is NOT an argument thread, don't get into rows please Just vote in the poll with your opinion if you feel like posting isn't gonna do any good

For anyone who hasn't seen the comments:
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...20&postcount=1

[Shaun]

I didn't think Tila Tequila should've been and she's a far more mentally-unhinged, bigoted, stupid bitch than he is on the regular, so no.

[Jordan.]

No, housemates should only be removed for their actions in the house.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Shaun

I didn't think Tila Tequila should've been and she's a far more mentally-unhinged, bigoted, stupid bitch than he is on the regular, so no.

Originally Posted by Jordan.

No, housemates should only be removed for their actions in the house.

If this was pre-CBB16 then I'd agree, but I think it'd be extremely unfair if he was allowed to stay and "redeem himself" to some viewers when Tila was not given the same opportunity.

[chuff me dizzy]

Load of rubbish, its a big fat NO from me

[Daniel.]

No but I haven't read them.

[reece(:]

Not if Tila wasn't allowed to stay

[T*]

i can't see him the same way for the duration of the show so yes

[Jack_]

No, Tila's ejection was moronic and totally unjustified and so would his

What they've said or done outside of the house is irrelevant. The point is to judge their actions inside the house, or else what's the point in doing the show? We may as well not bother

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Daniel.

No but I haven't read them.

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...20&postcount=1

[Lostie!]

If it's something that's worthy of stopping you entering the house in the first place (as plastering derogatory comments about sexuality, race and mental disability absolutely should imo), then it's enough to warrant an ejection.

Originally Posted by TomC

No, and anyone who votes yes is a little pathetic in my humble opinion.

Might wanna stick to posting your humble opinion on the topic and not other forum members since Hayden specifically said he didn't want his thread to descend into silly drama.

[Drew.]

Just going off consistency you've gotta argue if they've removed someone for doing something similar before then they should do it again

Thats not to say i want him removed because i think he could be a good controversial housemate that causes discussion, but if he was i wouldn't have any complaints

[Daniel.]

Ew he's TRASH

[Dominic]

No but since living legend Tila was ejected for hers, he does too ^^

[Kazanne]

No,that's silly,I will judge him as he is in the house

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Drew.

Just going off consistency you've gotta argue if they've removed someone for doing something similar before then they should do it again

Thats not to say i want him removed because i think he could be a good controversial housemate that causes discussion, but if he was i wouldn't have any complaints

Exactly this.

[Maru]

No, because that would be censorship and would only feed it. When he inevitably says something stupid in the house, then BB or the viewers can evict him.

I don't agree we should censor people with opinions we dislike because inevitably you end up with a nasty extreme that hits the red button everytime they see any opinion they dislike. However, we have a right to respond to them. That would be more fair. He would not be the first celebrity to be openly anti-gay and definitely won't be the last.

Tila didn't exactly come on TV with guns blazing and she did admit her views were OTT and not well thought out (I think).

[Daniel.]

He supports Trump so he should be removed

[Walter White]

sweet jesus, what a ****.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Drew.

Just going off consistency you've gotta argue if they've removed someone for doing something similar before then they should do it again

Thats not to say i want him removed because i think he could be a good controversial housemate that causes discussion, but if he was i wouldn't have any complaints

If they aren't even gonna expose his tweets in some silly task or something like they did with Winston's past comments, then he should just be ejected like Tila was, I agree it's about consistency.

And if they do use his comments in tasks like they exploited Winston with then C5 haven't learned their lesson either

[Rob!]

Well no?

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Hayden

This isn't an argument thread, no need to say thing like that

It takes two to argue, and I'll post how I feel.

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Might wanna stick to posting your humble opinion on the topic and not other forum members since Hayden specifically said he didn't want his thread to descend into silly drama.

Considering it directly involves the topic, no. Like I said to Hayden it takes two to argue, and I'll say what I feel.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

And YOUVE don't just that

Pardon?

[Drew.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

If they aren't even gonna expose his tweets in some silly task or something like they did with Winston's past comments, then he should just be ejected like Tila was, I agree it's about consistency.

And if they do use his comments in tasks like they exploited Winston with then C5 haven't learned their lesson either

I can't really remember Winstons, were they this bad?

I can't see C5 advertising Andrews tweets in a task, there would be too much of a backlash both on him and BB themselves for allowing someone like that in the house/showing off what he's said

[bitontheslide]

i need to find out more about him. Also, Tila was advocating and supporting murder, so its not comparing like with like.