FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
19-10-2016, 12:59 PM | #51 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
Quote:
Poor Teddy. I admit I found it hilarious (in a cruel way) when Dr Ford flat out told him they never even bothered to give him a backstory |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 01:05 PM | #52 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
.....I did think about your Kenny comment with those scenes and smiled probably more than I would have....it's fascinating as well really...(not so much the original movie but with the series..)...how they're exploring (some) of the makers actually seeing their projects as human as well.../the guy who was reluctant to make the cut with the knife and kind of winced a bit when Anthony Hopkins did....
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 01:15 PM | #53 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
Quote:
I also find Dr Ford's conflicting attitude towards the Hosts interesting. He has friendly chats over drinks with that old retired cowboy Host and talks about them in a way that suggests respect (and there was that line in the last ep when he alluded to the Hosts forgetting everything as being a mercy for them) but then we had the scene where he didn't feel the undressed Host needed to be covered and cut his face to prove he couldn't feel it. I read a theory that he feels more sympathy for them than he lets on and overcompensates for it (as with the scene with the face cut), I could see that tbh. But yeah, I love how morally ambiguous they've made him. Also I'm fully a believer of the "Bernard is a Host" theory now (I'm in full conspiracy theory mode, so yes I think his "wife" he was having a video chat with is just part of his storyline) Last edited by Lostie!; 19-10-2016 at 01:16 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:02 PM | #54 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
Ohhhh I like that Bernard theory
(I've caught up now, I'm hooked) |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:11 PM | #55 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:13 PM | #56 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:14 PM | #57 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:19 PM | #58 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
I love Maeve too
That whole sequence from when she woke up and escaped the operation table was captivating |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:20 PM | #59 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
Also was it just me that **** myself when the stray host picked up the rock or
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-10-2016, 03:29 PM | #60 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
Quote:
I love her sardonic, dry comments even when her bar's being ambushed or a dead guy's being tied up outside Quote:
Oh and I creased up at that female guest freaking out during the battle, "Oh my ****ING GOD!!!" The ending with Dolores running up to William and Logan sort of damages the William = Man in Black 30 years ago theory but I'm not abandoning it just let, they could have sneakily shoved in a scene of Dolores running from something else 30 years ago to throw us off (or not and she'd probably have a different role back then but I love the theorising so let me live). Last edited by Lostie!; 19-10-2016 at 03:36 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-10-2016, 06:03 AM | #61 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-10-2016, 08:16 PM | #62 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
I've actually read similar theories elsewhere about everyone being Hosts. And they did reference "management" having an agenda in the first episode so I could definitely see that with all the staff actually being robots and part of an elaborate experiment ran by the higher-ups
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
21-10-2016, 08:15 PM | #63 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
Ooh this is really cool, I never noticed. Someone on Reddit pointed out that an earlier version of Armistice (Hector Escaton's gunslinger partner) seemed to appear in that flashback when Dr Ford was talking about the early days of Westworld
Spoiler: They also showed her when Ford and Bernard were discussing the Bicameral Mind and how some of the Hosts became "lunatics", since she's a main character who's had very little screen time so far I'd bet this is relevant in the future. The Host who welcomed William to the park briefly appeared in the same sequence too. I love little things like this that I didn't pick up myself Last edited by Lostie!; 21-10-2016 at 11:22 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
21-10-2016, 10:05 PM | #64 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
I watched the first two episodes and I'm wigless.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
21-10-2016, 10:06 PM | #65 | |||
|
||||
Hakuna Matata
|
Another fan
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
21-10-2016, 10:11 PM | #66 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-10-2016, 03:13 AM | #67 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...oooo Dezzy watching.....
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
22-10-2016, 07:51 AM | #68 | |||
|
||||
nope
|
I'm loving this
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-10-2016, 02:12 AM | #69 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
Just watched episode one and hmm... it left me a little uncomfortable... in a good way.
It seems quite inspired by several video games - the wavering AI stuff reminds me a lot of Fallout 3 and Bioshock: Infinite. Quite enjoyed playing "what was he in?" (Beetee from the Hunger Games, that guy from Murder, She Wrote, Karl from Love Actually) but am intrigued by the actresses I didn't know anything of. Not sure I've seen Dolores, Elsie or Theresa in anything before but their characters interest me. It's just the right mix of unsettling/intriguing. Just hope it doesn't go too mind****y.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-10-2016, 10:40 AM | #70 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
I actually read that they said they were inspired by Bioshock (along with Red Dead Redemption and GTA).
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-10-2016, 05:43 PM | #71 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
I was about to say I'm all caught-up now but only seen episode 3. DLing 4 now
Liam Hemsworth's character is irritating and a little pointless atm, not to mention Ben Barnes' and whatever the name of that storyline writer guy is again. But looking over the plot of the original film and Logan/William seem to be based on the two main 'protagonists' (if you can call Logan that) and I would assume Ed Harris' character is based on the original villain. Film spoilers: Spoiler: Loving Maeve, Elsie and Ford the most. I find the Man in Black intriguing as well but a little bit of a dick.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-10-2016, 05:47 PM | #72 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
I watched episode 4 earlier.
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-10-2016, 08:00 PM | #73 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
On Now
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-10-2016, 09:41 PM | #74 | |||
|
||||
nope
|
Another great episode
Loving Maeve |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-10-2016, 10:03 PM | #75 | |||
|
||||
Namaste
|
She's brilliant
I really love the idea of the Hosts interpreting the men in hazmat suits as sinister creatures from another world and that the Native Americans worship them as deities. I assume this means they've been having memories they're not supposed to be having also, I'd guess them remembering the staff entering the park isn't part of their scheduled story The scene with Maeve and Clementine getting shot and the hazmat guys dragging them away was really well done, so unnerving. And Maeve having loads of the same drawing of them And since it's a weekly tradition ... POOR TEDDY Last edited by Lostie!; 25-10-2016 at 10:03 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|