[Binbin]

So, the wily old Scottish money-grubber, in true cliche, grabs 33.9K in advertising revenue. How much will good ole' Andrew give to Sam?

I like the Channel 5 version - which other channel can handle it? Unfortunately, the BBC could never do a BB - imagine your license fee going to fund an Andrew. Heads would roll...

[Fosse]

He should give him £ 3.95.

[smudgie]

He should give him nowt.

[SarenaW]

zero.

[Binbin]

Is there some connection between Raph-sympathisers and tight-arses?

[DouglasS]

He should give him all of it.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by smudgie

He should give him nowt.

Agreed
Andrew won it fair and square and Andrew destroyed Smellie so he can keep it

[Robodog]

The cowardly, two-faced, attention-seeking, argument-baiting, professional victim, drama queen will give Sam NOTHING

Obvs !!

Not that he has to. He won that money fair and square.

My issue with Andrew is not that he took the cash ( i would have done the same)

My issue is how he doesn't OWN his actions. All this masquerade of 'i;m so sorry, i'm so guilty, i'll give you some money..' etc - tis all COMPLETE PHONEY

Just like when he starts arguments: sniping away at Joe, at Simone, at Chanelle and Hannah - he started EVERY ONE of those arguments, then kept poking til he got a reaction.

Then when people respond - he runs away in a flurry of fake tears and plays the victim card. Then comes the virtue-signalling speech: 'I'm so nice, i never say a bad word about anyone' etc etc

Professional victim.

[Barry.]

None.

[Withano]

I think it will be 5k or absolutely zero. Probably the latter, cos I doubt he'll ever run into somebody who will tell him he should give Sam any of his money.

[Cherie]

Zero pounds thick as Sam is he grasped that early on

[Adamw92]

£15

[Binbin]

Originally Posted by BBfan2017

None.

In Andrew's case, I would encourage Sam check with a solicitor for a verbal contract case. It would be kind of interesting to see if emotional words spoken in the throws of a TV mess like BB are legally binding. Even if they are, I think Sam let the "professional victim" off the hook by telling him it's all good.

In the US, talk-TV fool Bill Maher -a greasy uber-douche - was sued by Donald Trump for $5million because he challenged America's Orange Mascot of Doom to prove that his mother wasn't a monkey. Something Trump did with surprising ease, only to find out that Maher's TV jibber-jabber didn't matter at all, and so, Trump had no case. I hope Sam has more success.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Binbin

So, the wily old Scottish money-grubber, in true cliche, grabs 33.9K in advertising revenue. How much will good ole' Andrew give to Sam?

I like the Channel 5 version - which other channel can handle it? Unfortunately, the BBC could never do a BB - imagine your license fee going to fund an Andrew. Heads would roll...

ZERO !

[arista]

Originally Posted by Withano

I think it will be 5k or absolutely zero. Probably the latter, cos I doubt he'll ever run into somebody who will tell him he should give Sam any of his money.

That would make Sam be Very Happy

[chuff me dizzy]

He owes Sam nothing

[bitontheslide]

i would give him a pound, just to rub it in

[TaylorCallum]

Well if Andrew gets his money in Scottish notes there's no point in giving anything to Sam because England doesn't accept our money .

On a serious note I don't actually think he'll give him anything even though he said he would .

[joeysteele]

Andrew mentioned 5k in the highlights afterwards.

I'd doubt he will.

[BBUK-Fan]

Andrew is a liar and won't give Sam anything.

[Jase.]

Obviously absolutely nothing

[parmnion]

Give him the used wax strips.

[tb24259]

Originally Posted by Robodog

The cowardly, two-faced, attention-seeking, argument-baiting, professional victim, drama queen will give Sam NOTHING

Obvs !!

Not that he has to. He won that money fair and square.

My issue with Andrew is not that he took the cash ( i would have done the same)

My issue is how he doesn't OWN his actions. All this masquerade of 'i;m so sorry, i'm so guilty, i'll give you some money..' etc - tis all COMPLETE PHONEY

Just like when he starts arguments: sniping away at Joe, at Simone, at Chanelle and Hannah - he started EVERY ONE of those arguments, then kept poking til he got a reaction.

Then when people respond - he runs away in a flurry of fake tears and plays the victim card. Then comes the virtue-signalling speech: 'I'm so nice, i never say a bad word about anyone' etc etc

Professional victim.

Agree 100% but his mincing and growl of ''Hell's comin'' did make me chuckle as it was so ridiculous

[point17]

None but i really dnt like andrew. Worst contestant we have had all year and infuriating to watch. Biggest waste of prize fund money ever.

Having said that all 4 2nd chance housemates were amongst the worst so would have been a waste whoever won.

Its weird to think that raph and deb wont see any decent amount and andrew gets so much

[millyrose]

Nothing