[reece(:]

As Britney Spears and Kevin Federline’s child support battle rages on, Wendy Williams is ‘disgusted’ with the singer! She slammed Britney for not being ‘in charge’ of her own life and her kids at age 36!

Wendy Williams, 53, had some harsh words and critical advice for Britney Spears, 36, on her show, May 24, after hearing that the singer isn’t willing to grant Kevin Federline‘s request for more child support. “Britney’s got deal after deal on the table and reportedly she’s making 33 million dollars a year and I’m not counting her money and I don’t want to count her money… Britney, not for nothing, but what kind of woman is not taking care of her own two kids as a full time mother, just asking?” Wendy went off! Federline, 40, and Spears share two sons together, Sean Preston, 12, and Jayden James, 11.

Wendy went on to question why Britney isn’t in control of major aspects of her life, including her finances. “And, why is your father still in charge of all your money? So, Kevin’s in charge of your boys, your father is in charge of your money, what are you in charge of Britney, at 36-years-old?” the talk show host asked, before laying down the hammer on Brit. “I get it, she’s got her career and the whole bit, but you’re the one who laid down and had two kids, now take care of your kids,” Wendy said, adding, “How about you fight for custody from Kevin?… Very disgusted.”

As you may know, Brit’s father, Jamie Spears took over as conservator of her finances after she suffered serious mental health issues in 2008. And, that subject wasn’t off the table for Wendy. “I like Britney Spears and I believe people can get better with the proper guidance and doctors and stuff, but that was Kevin Federline who stayed with you when you were attacking cars with umbrellas and shaving your head and going off the rails of life,” she said. “I’m just telling Britney, you want to deny this man, just remember this is the same man who can write the book and tell the stories… He’s held your secrets, he’s the sole custody caretaker of your 11 and 12-year-old.” Federline currently has full custody of their sons, according to reports. It’s also important to note that the talk show host presented an argument for both sides of the situaiton.

Federline is now requesting three times the amount Spears already pays him in child support, which is $20,000 ($10,000 per son). The father of six claims he makes less than 1 percent of what Spears does in new court documents filed on May 22 (first obtained by The Blast). He is currently earning $3,000 a month. Federline also claims in the documents that Spears “earns in excess of $34,000,000 per year.”

While Spears has yet to release a statement on the new court docs, she’s reportedly questioning what Federline is doing with the $20,000 she pays him per month. He also has four other kids. “Kevin wants a raise in money and he can’t account for where the $20,000 is going,” a source close to the singer told Entertainment Tonight.
https://hollywoodlife.com/2018/05/24...ederline-kids/

They did Brit so wrong with that pic. She should'nt give him a penny after reading this!

[Marsh.]

Wait, he's raising the kids?

Pay up Britney!!!

[Amy Jade]

Why should he get money off her?

[Oliver_W]

If this Federline bloke is raising their kids, she should totally pay toward their upbringing. If the genders were reversed, there'd be no question.

[montblanc]

wendy snapped!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

Why should he get money off her?

Because he's raising the kids. If she had them, she'd hall him into court to pay his fair dues.

However, if he really is wanting more because he's "too old to work as a dancer" then maybe he should get a regular job, or become a dance teacher?

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

If this Federline bloke is raising their kids, she should totally pay toward their upbringing. If the genders were reversed, there'd be no question.

She is paying. He wants more. Why?

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

She is paying. He wants more. Why?

Because $20,000 out of a reported $34m income is pitiful?

[Amy Jade]

But he is saying he wants more because he cannot dance anymore. If Britney is paying him already then it sounds like he wants more off her so he can sit on his arse to me.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Because he's raising the kids. If she had them, she'd hall him into court to pay his fair dues.

However, if he really is wanting more because he's "too old to work as a dancer" then maybe he should get a regular job, or become a dance teacher?

I get that (the first paragraph) but she already does pay more than him. It says $10,000 each which I guess is a month so if she is putting 20k towards them and he is apparently only earning $3,000 a month why is he asking for more?

If you can't raise a child on $10,000 a month then perhaps he should look at his finances?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I get that (the first paragraph) but she already does pay more than him. It says $10,000 each which I guess is a month so if she is putting 20k towards them and he is apparently only earning $3,000 a month why is he asking for more?

If you can't raise a child on $10,000 a month then perhaps he should look at his finances?

That's not the point though?

Of course he pays a lot less if he only earns less than 1% of what she earns.

It's kind of like questioning why some should pay more taxes than others.

They're her kids just as much as his so giving him such a paltry sum is actually, as Wendy says, disgusting.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

But he is saying he wants more because he cannot dance anymore. If Britney is paying him already then it sounds like he wants more off her so he can sit on his arse to me.

So he can't carry out his job any more, and now he's left to be a single parent to a millionaire's kids on a shade under £15k? Sound fair.

(If the $10k per son is annually)

[Amy Jade]

Okay yeah that makes sense now you guys are explaining it like that haha

Not sure how fair it is for Wendy to call Britney disgusting though when Joe is still in charge of her finances.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

So he can't carry out his job any more, and now he's left to be a single parent to a millionaire's kids on a shade under £15k? Sound fair.

(If the $10k per son is annually)

I see what you mean but just because she is a millionaire doesn't mean she should have to support him. Support her boys certainly but not pay for him not to work at all. Their kids are in school he could get a job around that or push Britney to be there more to allow him to work.

[Marsh.]

I don't care what anyone says, she's clearly never recovered from her breakdown is basically like a puppet with dead eyes when she's in public with everyone else in her life obviously pulling the strings.

[Toy Soldier]

$20,000 a month isn't exactly low... but then again, as a percentage of her income (if that's accurate) it's pretty abysmal; it would need to be increased to $30,000 to even be 1% of her earnings... and for two children, closer to 5% seems much more realistic? I remember when Poor ol' Eddie Murphy was paying Scary Spice something like $50,000 a month and that was for ONE child.


On the other hand they should surely be relatively comfortable on $240,000 a year + whatever his earnings are

[Nicky91]

UGH Wendy ur such an annoying woman sometimes

and this kevin vs Britney drama has been going on for many many years now

[Livia]

While $20,000 per month is substantial, as a percentage of her earnings it's chicken feed. This is financial support for her kids, not a voluntary contribution. She has no right at all to account for the money once it's given to the father, it ceases to be "her money". But hey, that's the kind of "mother" she is. If he's looking after the kids while she's free to follow her career, she should be thanking him and paying up.

If we were talking about a male pop star and a female ex-dancer no longer the right age to follow that career, would people insist that she got a job?

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I don't care what anyone says, she's clearly never recovered from her breakdown is basically like a puppet with dead eyes when she's in public with everyone else in her life obviously pulling the strings.

I agree Marshy. Dead eyes is right.

[bitontheslide]

i think it's wrong on so many levels to publicly criticise someone with clear mental health issues on such an emotive topic as parenting.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i think it's wrong on so many levels to publicly criticise someone with clear mental health issues on such an emotive topic as parenting.

Well, she makes her living from being a celebrity. We've all seen her schmundie when she climbed out of that car with no knickers on, we've all seen her shave her head and all the other crazy stuff she did in public, that's how she lives her live. Nothing about her has been private for years. Her "people" have made a public statement, thus adding to the discussion.

Hey Bots x

[Denver]

She doesn't care for the kids

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Livia

While $20,000 per month is substantial, as a percentage of her earnings it's chicken feed. This is financial support for her kids, not a voluntary contribution. She has no right at all to account for the money once it's given to the father, it ceases to be "her money". But hey, that's the kind of "mother" she is. If he's looking after the kids while she's free to follow her career, she should be thanking him and paying up.

If we were talking about a male pop star and a female ex-dancer no longer the right age to follow that career, would people insist that she got a job?

Excellent post.

Took the words out of my fingers

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Livia

While $20,000 per month is substantial, as a percentage of her earnings it's chicken feed. This is financial support for her kids, not a voluntary contribution. She has no right at all to account for the money once it's given to the father, it ceases to be "her money". But hey, that's the kind of "mother" she is. If he's looking after the kids while she's free to follow her career, she should be thanking him and paying up.

If we were talking about a male pop star and a female ex-dancer no longer the right age to follow that career, would people insist that she got a job?

Well said Livia,spot on again,100% agree.

[Eddie.]

Originally Posted by reece(:

They did Brit so wrong with that pic. She should'nt give him a penny after reading this!

This article is missing a lot of information.

Where is the part of Kevin requesting 40k so that he could give the kids the privelliged lifestyle that Britney gives?

K-Fed doesn’t even have a job.

Where is the part that claims that Kevin uses all the child support on his six children?

And Wendy, oh lord.

Though I may be coming to Britney’s defense so easily because I stan her