FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
17-10-2018, 01:31 PM | #26 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
They won't change anything. I'm 100% sure they won't. I just think it's too late now.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 01:40 PM | #27 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 01:47 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
The result will be VTS at any rate, what a joke, I am glad the show is finishing
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 02:18 PM | #29 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 02:35 PM | #30 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 03:09 PM | #31 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 03:10 PM | #32 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
By the way, just about every poll with a relatively larger number of voters has Vote To Evict winning. So when Vote to Save wins, that will be another dodgy outcome.
It should be noted that with Hussain seemingly imploding, there's still a possibility that he's up and I imagine it being possibly close between him and Lewis this week in a Vote To Evict. Even so, Lewis is a goner in the Vote To Evict format at some point, and they know it. Last edited by Yaki da; 17-10-2018 at 03:10 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 03:10 PM | #33 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
I love you!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 03:14 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
oh dear, so basically what the OP is saying is that he can't win by fair means so it has to be by cheating it will make such a difference to my life if he wins I can't even begin to tell you
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 03:26 PM | #35 | |||
|
||||
Mode: Broken
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 04:45 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
A bit pathetic, no?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 04:51 PM | #37 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:35 PM | #38 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The fact is, it is totally unfair that such a change is being done to the voting format in the middle of an nomination/eviction process for the sole purpose of keeping certain people in, in the first place. So to talk of fairness in respect to this is laughable anyway. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:39 PM | #39 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Most reality shows aren't fair (especially in the modern era), they are entertainment programmes first and foremost and are manipulated to maximise that potential
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:41 PM | #40 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:48 PM | #41 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Some people still had an issue with the viewer nomination, and before that others had an issue with the addition of the Gamechanger
I don't have a problem with this poll at all, in fact I pray they rig it to get the right result. So long as producer manipulation is for the greater good and for the benefit of the series overall, I'm all for it...and that goes for most reality shows that have public votes Last edited by Jack_; 17-10-2018 at 05:49 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:52 PM | #42 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 05:58 PM | #43 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 06:05 PM | #44 | ||||
|
|||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Yaki da; 17-10-2018 at 06:05 PM. |
||||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 06:12 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 06:38 PM | #46 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 06:45 PM | #47 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The most popular will not be evicted in VTS.
The least popular and floaters get through on VTE. Here for it. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 06:59 PM | #48 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 07:11 PM | #49 | ||||
|
|||||
oh fack off
|
Quote:
But as I said I don't think the viewer nom is unfair so I'd prefer it if we left this part or else this conversation is going to become even longer. Quote:
I'm struggling to care when it's the opposite. Positive manipulation is a-okay with me and part and parcel of reality television, especially in the modern era. Quote:
The production team also has a duty and objective to ensure that they are maximising the potential of the cast and storyline strands, and attempting to prevent the public from destroying that is totally understandable. Quote:
The show's demise has been due to a lot of things (most of which are Channel 5's doing - you can read my post in the Ratings Thread for my thoughts on that), but this isn't one of them. There was production manipulation well over a decade ago, and surprisingly enough there were still in excess of 5m people watching. Do you know what is damaging to series of Big Brother though? Dreadful eviction orders. There have been examples in BBUK's history where several big characters have been evicted and the show's ratings for that series have declined. It has even happened this year...and people think it doesn't matter Love Island has a production manual which details certain "safety nets" to protect the "key characters" (which is how they refer to it) from public votes to ensure they last as long as possible - and guess what? Over 3m people watch it every night and it's ITV2's most successful show. They tried a vote to This is to the benefit of the overall series and franchise, not just Lewis. It should've been implemented five years ago, let alone now. |
||||
Reply With Quote |
17-10-2018, 07:40 PM | #50 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The show's demise began on Channel 4 (hence the reason it was axed there as well) because of this kind of interference. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You're essentially saying they can do whatever they want including saying "Yeah, **** the format, **** the viewers, **** the voters, **** you all. We do as we please despite this supposedly being an interactive show" That kind of attitude stinks and it is what ultimately destroys a show. The show has not benefited one bit from it. Last edited by Yaki da; 17-10-2018 at 07:42 PM. |
||||||||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|