FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-02-2019, 09:27 PM | #251 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Fantastic.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 12:49 PM | #252 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Never followed this story but reading the thread start to finish is fascinating.
So did he pay these guys to beat him up or not? Why was he wandering around with a piece of rope round his neck? I’m none the wiser. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:09 PM | #253 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Nothing's confirmed yet, but it seems like he paid them to help fake the hatecrime, and the rope was part of the monkeyshines.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:09 PM | #254 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
For what it's worth, it looks like the original story is absolutely full of holes but there's probably more to it than what has come out so far. It's a fascinating story if you look at it from a detached standpoint but a LOT of people seem to have some sort of vested interest in this... on "both sides"... for various reasons which are *ahem* open to speculation . It's become a tense battle between opposing circlejerking factions who are each desperate to shout "HAH! Told u so!!!" and the actual details are mattering less and less. No matter what the outcome, no one is winning here, except of course sensible chaps like you and me NM who are only here for the show. [edit] Oh, also, Alf took the "it's all BS" stance immediately and was proven (it seems) right after there had already been a lot of battling about it... but then in his vindication, made an utter spectacle of himself and got a week long ban. And Becs is Alf on an alt, OR maybe Brillo, OR a friend of Alf's, OR a new member but no one cares. That should be you up to date. Last edited by Toy Soldier; 19-02-2019 at 01:13 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:15 PM | #255 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
It's disgusting if it's true as he has made light of racism and homophobia to profit from it but I just can't see it being true, it just doesn't make sense. He's got a steady gig that would have likely led to other opportunities given Empire's success and he could have easily become a spokesperson through normal means given his position.
I'll be very interested to see how this turns out. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:18 PM | #256 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:19 PM | #257 | ||
|
|||
-
|
There'll probably be a Netflix documentary about it in a couple of years. We should just wait for that
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:23 PM | #258 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
maybe he's doing some sort of method acting for a new role or something?
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:25 PM | #259 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Quote:
The thread was incorrectly opened and worded from the start All the bigotry and preducise came from members in ivory towers thinking that they had to be right Naturally there is no sight of them now |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:37 PM | #260 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
It's the difference between; "I'm not sure if this entirely adds up, let's wait and see how it unfolds" and "You're 'avin a larf aintcher??? What a load of NONSENSE!!! Definitely untrue!" An alleged attack victim should be given the benefit of the doubt until there IS evidence that contradicts it... and as it turns out, it wouldn't have required much patience to wait for this one to start unravelling. And I have to stand by the opinion that Alf got the ban for the spectacle he made once vindicated / the additional things he said, and not because "people couldn't handle being wrong". I do agree though that there are certain names suddenly missing from the thread now that the narrative has changed but I don't know that there's much point harping on about that or making it a character flaw... I mean not to be too patronising but we all had to learn at some point, and there's nothing inherently WRONG with wanting to believe the best in people when they say something has happened to them. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:38 PM | #261 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I wouldn’t like to take a side on this as I don’t know much about it.(same reason I generally stay out of the McCann threads). It seems very strange though from everything i’ve read on here.The original story seems to get weaker as time goes by. Maybe more evidence will come about later or if not one of those unsolved mysteries shows will tackle it. People’s instant reaction these days especially when it comes to minorities or women is ‘always believe the victim’ which I don’t agree with.It seems like people wanting to be with the ‘In crowd’ or ‘woke brigade’ as leaning left is the current trend,Or pay the ultimate price of being left out in the cold on Twitter. Opinions are the latest fasion accessories. Modern politics has a part to play in this. People are either on one side or the other.Left or Right.Choose a side. No room for good old fence sitting anymore. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:39 PM | #262 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
It's quite petty to demand apologies from people for believing the best in others. A bigger person would have let it go.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:39 PM | #263 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:43 PM | #264 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:45 PM | #265 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:46 PM | #266 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Circumstantial; the sandwich may have been immediately dropped and not involved in the scuffle, and picked up afterwards. Which is a bit grubby but each to their own! Or the incident might have been over very quickly, so the legally binding 5-second-rule could be implemented.
Sheer conjecture Last edited by Toy Soldier; 19-02-2019 at 01:46 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:47 PM | #267 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
If that’s true then using ‘hate crime’ to get publicity is some fecked up shiz.
Last edited by Northern Monkey; 19-02-2019 at 01:47 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:49 PM | #268 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:49 PM | #269 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
The motivation for setting the whole thing up is pretty obvious to me, if thats how it all turns out. It was a political stunt to discredit Trump and his supporters. Which is just so very very stupid given the amount of 100% genuine crap that trump and his supporters have done.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:50 PM | #270 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
oh lettuce alone will you
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:52 PM | #271 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
Like... Racehatecrimeception. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:52 PM | #272 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
They should show sympathy while mentally staying firmly on the fence until they the evidence is there. Anybody can say they’ve been a victim of a hate crime now to use as an aggravating factor or even if no crime is committed. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:56 PM | #273 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
I mean I've sadly witnessed the police attend a number of "assaults" that were more accurately mutual fights that escalated, and they definitely don't barge in pointing fingers until they've asked bystanders what actually happened. It's usually us they ask because the shop has a good view of the area and we're nosy / bored AF and gather round the windows when there's drama outside . Last edited by Toy Soldier; 19-02-2019 at 01:57 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 01:56 PM | #274 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
19-02-2019, 02:00 PM | #275 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Best way to kill actual stories
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|