[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Livia

Everyone born to Bangladeshi parents is automatically a Bangladeshi citizen. That's the plain truth. Stating that's just me being contradictory is ridiculous. They don't want to take her... fine. She's stuck then, isn't she.

It's contradictory to be "confused" that Bangladesh are denying her as a citizen, yet "not confused" that the UK (country of birth) is rejecting her as a citizen.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

It's contradictory to be "confused" that Bangladesh are denying her as a citizen, yet "not confused" that the UK (country of birth) is rejecting her as a citizen.

Now pay attention TS... I am confused that they has said she is not a Bangladeshi citizen when she is, in law. I don't care if they take her or not... but there are plenty of militant Islamists in Bangladesh, I'm sure she'd feel quite at home.

[Vicky.]

Is there proof that 1.4 Jihadis dont even see a court room? I didn't realise we had 'let back' people like her before actually. But I don't really follow this kind of stuff much in all honesty. News links and many discussions seem to be either filled with 'let them all in, human rights! Racist!' or '**** them all. and deport the rest too!'. No nuance at all. (not meaning on here obviously..but news links and other forums depress the **** out of me on this kind of discussion. Also discussions on Brexit)

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Livia

Now pay attention TS... I am confused that they has said she is not a Bangladeshi citizen when she is, in law. I don't care if they take her or not... but there are plenty of militant Islamists in Bangladesh, I'm sure she'd feel quite at home.

Well I have to admit that does clarify your stance Livia.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Well I have to admit that does clarify your stance Livia.

Good. I'm glad. And I'm unapologetic for my stance. Enough pandering to militants. If they think we're treating them harshly, they should try Saudi. Or Syria maybe? Then the whole family can be together.

[bitontheslide]

I predict she and her family will be given new identities here in the UK ... just putting that here now for future reference

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Is there proof that 1.4 Jihadis dont even see a court room? I didn't realise we had 'let back' people like her before actually. But I don't really follow this kind of stuff much in all honesty. News links and many discussions seem to be either filled with 'let them all in, human rights! Racist!' or '**** them all. and deport the rest too!'. No nuance at all. (not meaning on here obviously..but news links and other forums depress the **** out of me on this kind of discussion. Also discussions on Brexit)

I posted a link earlier in the thread it was never picked up because it doesnt suit the narrative that she will jailed as soon as she set foot in the UK

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

I predict she and her family will be given new identities here in the UK ... just putting that here now for future reference

This is exactly what will happen

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Livia

There's never any mention in the press about her family, except when we're being told they think our government is unjust. But they're supporters of extremism too. Personally I think this story needs to be off the news and off the front page.

I agree, she will get back here, we are a laughing stock, not surprised that police officer who wants her back is a friend of the family,a family that believes it was right to kill Lee Rigby and a family that actively march with Anjem Choudry, why are people not concerned about the families of those killed by these scumbags ? Britain is not so great anymore, makes me a bit ashamed to be a Brit,seems we have to take whatever is thrown at us.that little backbone we had will soon break when the PC brigade start their tantrums.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Cherie

This is exactly what will happen

Yep, it's a given, she will be slipped in quietly and we will pay to keep them and maybe the little boy will be radicalised too as she said she would have wanted her son that died to fight for Isis. Way to go Britain.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Is there proof that 1.4 Jihadis dont even see a court room? I didn't realise we had 'let back' people like her before actually. But I don't really follow this kind of stuff much in all honesty. News links and many discussions seem to be either filled with 'let them all in, human rights! Racist!' or '**** them all. and deport the rest too!'. No nuance at all. (not meaning on here obviously..but news links and other forums depress the **** out of me on this kind of discussion. Also discussions on Brexit)

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ted-return-uk/

[Vicky.]

Thanks Cherie. Thats genuinely shocking. And irresponsible of those in charge.

[Denver]

Corbyn has said we should support terrorists who want to return home.

Is this guy for real? if she was a jew he would want her gone for good

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Corbyn has said we should support terrorists who want to return home.

Is this guy for real? if she was a jew he would want her gone for good

I saw that Adam,is this bloke for real .

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Corbyn has said we should support terrorists who want to return home.

Is this guy for real? if she was a jew he would want her gone for good

Can someone actually confirm what he said without his words being obviously twisted?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Livia

I think the News organisations have to take responsibility. The government can't dictate what the news makes their top story. It's an incendiary story and the News orgs will run with that, rather than give us another twenty minutes on the mare's nest that is Brexit.

But the government can certainly help in keeping it at the forefront of attention. I think they knew that they couldn't strip her of her citizenship but attempting to do so will dominate the news cycle for a while.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Can someone actually confirm what he said without his words being obviously twisted?

This vile piece if scum deserves no support what so ever

[Cherie]

She needs to answer questions and then any action may or may not be taken, I think we know which one it will be

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

This vile piece if scum deserves no support what so ever

Thank you for proving that you're pushing a false narrative and twisting people's words so I don't have to.

He didn't say anything there that a lot of people haven't already pointed out. There is uncertainty on all sides about the power to strip someone of citizenship and it being misused and if it doesn't go through then she does legally have the right to return. He didn't say anything about terrorists being allowed back and he certainly didn't seem supportive of her. He simply stated that she has the right to come back and that, if it happens, she should face questioning.

Stop twisting people's words for your own agenda, Adam.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

She needs to answer questions and then any action may or may not be taken, I think we know which one it will be

She has done interviews
with SkyNewsHD , BBC and ITVnews
all these TV interviews have made it worse
for her.


On the BBC interview
she did not care about our Manchester
Terrorist Attack in May 2017
comparing it to Syria attacks

that has made many more angry

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Thank you for proving that you're pushing a false narrative and twisting people's words so I don't have to.

He didn't say anything there that a lot of people haven't already pointed out. There is uncertainty on all sides about the power to strip someone of citizenship and it being misused and if it doesn't go through then she does legally have the right to return. He didn't say anything about terrorists being allowed back and he certainly didn't seem supportive of her. He simply stated that she has the right to come back and that, if it happens, she should face questioning.

Stop twisting people's words for your own agenda, Adam.

She lost her rights to be treated as a human the day she left this county to bring harm to millions of innocent people.

Nobody wants her so there is only one realistic option

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

She lost her rights to be treated as a human the day she left this county to bring harm to millions of innocent people.

Nobody wants her so there is only one realistic option

She didn't lose her rights, international law is international law whether we like it or not and framing people who point out that law as being terrorist sympathisers is a disgusting way of censoring views you disagree with.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Adam.

She lost her rights to be treated as a human the day she left this county to bring harm to millions of innocent people.

Nobody wants her so there is only one realistic option

Some do want her back to understand
what went wrong.
But it will cost money once she is back
as she will need protecting

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

She didn't lose her rights, international law is international law whether we like it or not and framing people who point out that law as being terrorist sympathisers is a disgusting way of censoring views you disagree with.

Corbyn is a known racist and terrorist sympathiser

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Corbyn is a known racist and terrorist sympathiser

I can't say anything of other agendas but whatever's been said about him in the past doesn't change the fact that you've straight up lied about what he has said here and framed him as a terrorist sympathiser in this instance for pointing out a fact.